User talk:Gwalchmai100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Zara Kay—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Zara Kay, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Zara Kay. Elizium23 (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Zara Kay shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Elizium23 (talk) 23:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Zara Kay[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Edit warring and POV-pushing.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You seem to be using this article as a vehicle for your personal POV about Zara Kay. It does not 'increase objectivity' to accuse this woman of Islamophobia in Wikipedia's voice, without any reliable source that associates her with Islamophobia. Your evidence seems to be that she made tweets in favor of LGBT rights. EdJohnston (talk) 19:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]