User talk:Haaftjlv

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Haaftjlvgb! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 23:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change username request[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you wanted to change your name to merge it with your SUL account. Please place a request here. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions, Regards NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 17:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation[edit]

Please, look also on my Dutch "overleg" - page Haaftjlv Take: lemma "Dolf Coppes" for instance !

I, Haaftjlv , do confirm here that I am "Haaftjlvgb" on the English Wikipedia. I will be very thankfull when my request will be processed. Haaftjlvgb (talk) 16:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mission accomplished[edit]

I, Haaftjlv now have noticed dat my request to merge en unify my password at the English Wikipedia with the Dutch one has been accomplished. Thank you very much for your help 83.85.57.81 (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marten Post[edit]

The article Marten Post has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 22:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Haaftjlv. You have new messages at Jsfouche's talk page.
Message added 02:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I'm not saying it's not important, but BLPs require reliable references. I don't have any references, or I would add them. Good luck, and happy editing!! jsfouche ☽☾ talk 02:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelly McBride[edit]

The article Kelly McBride has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ɯɐɔ 💬 01:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Haaftjlv, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your article Kelly McBride appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. I noticed that you copied almost all of this for your article, which is definitely not okay to do without citations. That source alone also does not provide sufficient context for why Kelly McBride is notable, and is clearly biased in her favor. Thank you. ɯɐɔ 💬 01:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about John Gartner (psychologist)[edit]

Hello, Haaftjlv,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether John Gartner (psychologist) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Gartner (psychologist) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kleptocracy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OGE and Ivanka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Laura Coates[edit]

Hi, I'm Rosguill. Haaftjlv, thanks for creating Laura Coates!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. As this article is a biography of a living person it is extremely important that all claims be backed by citations to reliable sources. Unsourced information may be removed without notice.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Haaftjlv (Joop in Dutch (Like John or Joe)

Thank you, for making contact to improve my English Wikipedia contribution Laura Coates.

First in short some background : Sinds 2016 I am a daily viewer of CNN (New Day) and more, both horrified and fascinated by Donald Trump and The Trump-supporters (Base) and Trump-haters. Because it is not healthy only to take this input, I produce weekly some OUTPT = WKP-articles, often translated from EN.Wikipedia about American persons mostly from The Trump-universe. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedy I am obliged to be factual and objective. Being a retired engaged civil servant of 75 y. I am tired of producing opinions.

Back to my contribution Laura Coates

Motive for my creating of a lemma of her in EN en NL Wikipedia was that I have seen her this year performing as an often-required and convincing Legal Commentater on CNN, mostly in panels at CNN's New Day.

It was strange to me that I after month's could not find a profile of her on CNN's website.

So I decided to create them my self. I agree that the facts are far from complete. But this is what I could harvest from Googling. I emailed Coates but she did not react.

Nevertheless I think she deserves by featuring as a young Afro-American expert to be a lemma in Wikipedia's.

Dear Rosguill, if you can be helpful, I would appreciate such very much.

Haaftjlv (talk) 20:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Westlessness[edit]

The article Westlessness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neologism only used in one report, and a bunch of articles reporting on the report.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 16:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

There is insufficient context in these two paragraphs to make it it's own article. There likely already is content on this topic in parent articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Haaftjlv/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Haaftjlv/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Talk 23:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Haaftjlv! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Talk 23:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Haaftjlv/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Haaftjlv. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]