User talk:Halavar
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Thank you for your Poland-related contributions
[edit]![]() |
Hello and welcome Halavar! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community. |
--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to English Wikipedia
[edit]Welcome aboard Halavar! --Godot13 (talk) 22:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the welcome:) Halavar (talk) 00:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/30px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bichvinta. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please STOP edit warring--g. balaxaZe✰ 00:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Sveti Stefan (06).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 06:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:2014 Erywań, Katedra św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (05).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 07:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
|
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Widok na Perast z zachodu 01.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 17:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Halavar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Images
[edit]Are you Marcin Konsek? Is that why you are putting the photos you took on every article you can find? Please note that we don't appreciate you labeling your images as valued and quality when it is your own, especially when the images you used are not necessarily better than the ones you replaced. Hzh (talk) 22:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- That is a normal thing - changing images to better ones and putting the best ones on other wiki projects. Me and others do that for years. Halavar (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Who said they are better apart from yourself? Hzh (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Better because others users gave a QI and VI status to my image. If you don't agree with me, please talk with the author of the previous image, admin from Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Poco_a_poco From what I know, he agrees with me:) --Halavar (talk) 23:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Right, just because you submitted your images does not mean your images are better. It is still you yourself who is saying that it is better. For example, this image [1], the sky is cloudy, and you have a big grey building near the center in the background, distracting the building under illustration. Whereas the image you replaced - [2], the building is centered, clear and focused, with the big buildings in the background at the side and not in the main line of sight. You replace a better image with a poorer one for illustration. Hzh (talk) 23:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't decide that my image is better, but someone else, who is involved in the VI project - see here: Commons:Valued image candidates/2016 Kuala Lumpur, Narodowe Muzeum Włókiennictwa.jpg There is a tradition, that when a image gets VI status, people (also aouthor/nominator) replace images in the wiki projects. If you think, that you are better expert of photography, please involve in Valued Images project. You know, you can nominate that other image and compare it with mine, and people will decide with one is better. --Halavar (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- The process that can replace a better image with a poorer is flaky to say the least. I can see that your image is not better for illustration because there are other elements that are distracting from the main building under illustration. Even if an image is of better quality, it does not necessarily mean that it is better for illustration because everything get shrunk down to a small image in the article. For example, this one - [3] could be trimmed a little at the edges to focus on the main building because while it is better than the earlier one, it looks too small in the article because the image on display is small. I don't involved myself that much in the Commons, I usually upload images (my own or found) only because the required image is missing, or the existing image is poor. I don't claim to be an expert in photography, but at least I know what looks right on the page. Hzh (talk) 01:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't decide that my image is better, but someone else, who is involved in the VI project - see here: Commons:Valued image candidates/2016 Kuala Lumpur, Narodowe Muzeum Włókiennictwa.jpg There is a tradition, that when a image gets VI status, people (also aouthor/nominator) replace images in the wiki projects. If you think, that you are better expert of photography, please involve in Valued Images project. You know, you can nominate that other image and compare it with mine, and people will decide with one is better. --Halavar (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Right, just because you submitted your images does not mean your images are better. It is still you yourself who is saying that it is better. For example, this image [1], the sky is cloudy, and you have a big grey building near the center in the background, distracting the building under illustration. Whereas the image you replaced - [2], the building is centered, clear and focused, with the big buildings in the background at the side and not in the main line of sight. You replace a better image with a poorer one for illustration. Hzh (talk) 23:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Halavar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Halavar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Picture of the day
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a7/2014_Erywa%C5%84%2C_Katedra_%C5%9Bw._Grzegorza_O%C5%9Bwieciciela_%2805%29.jpg/100px-2014_Erywa%C5%84%2C_Katedra_%C5%9Bw._Grzegorza_O%C5%9Bwieciciela_%2805%29.jpg)
Greetings
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:2014 Erywań, Katedra św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (05).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 7, 2020. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2020-04-07. An impressive building! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Widok na Perast z zachodu 01.JPG scheduled for POTD
[edit]Hi Halavar,
This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Widok na Perast z zachodu 01.JPG, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 5, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-06-05. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Perast is an old town on the Bay of Kotor in Montenegro. It is situated a few kilometres northwest of Kotor and is noted for its proximity to the islets of Saint George and Our Lady of the Rocks. Its history dates back to at least 1336, when it was the site of a small fishing village with a shipyard, but over time it became an important maritime centre. It prospered in the 16th century, when it was loyal to the Venetians at a time when the Republic of Venice and the Ottoman Empire were struggling for supremacy in the area. The wealthy merchants and sea captains built themselves grand palaces, mostly in the Baroque style, and there was a renowned naval college. Nowadays, the town relies on tourism for its income, and the number of residents has dwindled; it had a population of 274 at the last census. Photograph credit: Marcin Konsek
Recently featured:
|