User talk:HamzhaSaleem

Ask me anything --HamzhaSaleem (talk) 12:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irfan Amin Malik has been accepted[edit]

Irfan Amin Malik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with nomination[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I Nominate Irfan Amin Malik for did you know [1] will you please check what I have to do now.

thanks in advance --HamzhaSaleem (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hooks are missing but nevermind that: the nomination cannot succeed because the article is currently well below the bare minimum length of 1500 characters, see Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria. 78.28.44.31 (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Irfan Amin Malik at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit count farming[edit]

This series of useless edits to your user page is edit farming. If you are trying to game extended-confirmed status, that is not allowed. DanCherek (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddy1. Please read MOS:OVERLINK. Your edit to Shujaat Bukhari added links to Kashmir (twice), journalist, newspaper, and organization. These are useless links in the context of the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks Toddy1 for guidance it was my mistake I apologise for it

--HamzhaSaleem (talk) 09:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With respect of updating {{Service award progress|year=2020|month=07|day=8|edits=154}}, it is best to update it after every 1,000 edits or so. If you have done 1,900 edits, leave it as saying 1,000 until you have done 2,000.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sure thanks I hope you will guide me here as I need mentors. Toddy1 --HamzhaSaleem (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tips[edit]

Hello friend. Couple of tips for you. 1) Per WP:NPP, you should wait 15 minutes after an article is created before you tag for deletion. 2) When you add a birthdate for a living person, you must also add a citation to a reliable source. Per WP:BLP, birthdates are private information unless they are widely published. 3) When tagging short descriptions, it is a good idea to put the person's nationality too. For example: Indian journalist rather than just journalist. 4) It is not a good idea to use the generic {{db}} CSD tag, as those are usually rejected. A more specific criteria should be used. The criteria are listed at WP:CSD. Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok got it thank you appreciated User:Novem Linguae --HamzhaSaleem (talk) 12:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mobile. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocky Lee (August 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The presentation of information in the different sources are similar to each other. Press release like, surface level details, doesn't go into depth on why he is one of the major producers. Almost all linkdrop to either his email or instagram profile. A search on google shows a spate of articles about him released at about the same time at end April-May 2021 with similar presentation patterns and information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rocky Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rocky Lee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HamzhaSaleem! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Thamesinfotech per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thamesinfotech. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 08:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

help[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HamzhaSaleem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not connected with user thames, even i dont know sunantha so how you block my account i can edit any page but that doesnt mean you will block my account yeah without any evidence HamzhaSaleem (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed via technical evidence and is not in doubt. Yamla (talk) 10:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.