User talk:Hanskarlperez

Welcome!

Hello, Hanskarlperez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! King Lopez 11:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Before you start editing a page, read the discussion pages illustrating why the page has been changed to its current format. CP Guy

Getxo

Hi Hans. It looks like you are a rather new user to wikipedia. In this regard, please note that you just can not revert to a previous version without explaining your reasons, specially if the newer version you are reverting back has been supported in the edit summary or in the talk page, like in the Getxo case.

So please use the talk page to explain why you think the ANV claim belongs to a table which shows the actual number of councilors obtained by different parties.

Have a good day, --Mountolive | Talk 19:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hanskarlperez, you did the same thing on Basque language, when you put back text that I reverted for a good reason. You need to be able to back up your claims with a reliable source. And what does "oldest language" even mean? Are you implying that the ancestors of Basque speakers were writing poetry while the ancestors of English speakers could only grunt and point? It's a nonsensical claim. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 06:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making the leader post field messy. They have and will be reverted.

Warning: 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Hús ö nd 12:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether you are wrong or right, you may not engage in an edit war and try to enforce your changes more than 3 times a day. This rule applies to all users. Please use the article's talk page to talk your disagreements. Thank you. Hús ö nd 13:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States Casualties of War

What is the reason behind adding the presidents and their parties to the chart? I really feel such a major change needs to be discussed. Czolgolz (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be offended if I removed that section? I think someone is trying to make a political point. By the way, thank you for diligently updating the casualties section. Czolgolz (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and I'm sorry to have deleted all your hard work. Czolgolz (talk) 15:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SADR edit

Hello Where did you get this information? Please post on my talk if you choose to respond. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States casualties of war

Please don't revert the official DoD website as source for the casualties of OEF. Andre Toulon (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:Ealogo01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ealogo01.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Summer Olympics medal table

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

We only include NOCs recognized by the IOC. The EU does not have its own, distinct NOC, and your additions are original research. --Madchester (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toru Kannari

The article Toru Kannari has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Chzz ► 20:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the article Toru Kannari, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:19, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Community restrictions

The article Martin McGuinness‎, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are:

All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.
All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per day). When in doubt, assume it is related.
- Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty
Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

O Fenian (talk) 22:40, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

European Free Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aralar

The Greens–European Free Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aralar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary reminder

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to European Free Alliance does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felisopus (talk • contribs) 14:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Kaixo. You seem to have been around a bit but mayber you haven't come across this yet - it's not a good idea to just move "old" pages without first discussing it on the talk page. And your move of the PNV page was anything but uncontroversial, so please be more careful. Akerbeltz (talk) 17:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alain Arroyo - Reply

Hi there HANSKARL, AL from Portugal here,

thanks for your "thank you" note regarding my edit in this player's article. You did a mistake there but hey, who doesn't? Sorry if my edit summary seemed exaggerated, keep up the good work.

Happy week --AL (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://footballpink.net/2013/06/06/agur-san-mames-goodbye-san-mames/

"On June 5th, 2013 Alain Arroyo scored the very last goal at San Mamés. Starting today, the stadium will be torn down. Just beside the old stadium rises San Mamés Barria, the new home of Athletic. For the club and its supporters, it was a painful farewell to their beloved cathedral."

I did not make any mistake ... but who cares.

I see what you mean, Arroyo scored the last EVER goal at the ground, Juanlu scored the last official goal at the ground. I think we better stick with both versions, i am going to add your bit to storyline again, then "everybody"'s happy.

To wrap up my message, a question: why did you send me a "thank you" note if here you say "who cares"? I think i was polite, and i genuinely thought you had made a mistake, now i see you did not, even tough i'm also correct because official games is one thing, friendly games another.

Cheers --AL (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not you, it is not here, in FB, there was a discussion between the first score and the first oficial goal... first goal was scored by Pichichi, who names the league most score player, but it is unknown that Belauste is the first oficial score in the stadium. Sorry.

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Efrén Vázquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hanskarlperez. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]