User talk:Happyfunday

Welcome!

Hello, Happyfunday, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page CN Blue discography has been reverted.
Your edit here to CN Blue discography was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDpuWQgRHag) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happyfunday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i didn't abuse multiple accounts that i have 3 different internet connections all of them are me and why did the admin revert my edit i didn't do vandalism, even the ones with sources, i don't get it

Decline reason:

Two of your accounts were editing in related areas in violation of WP:SOCK - and that's assuming the other dozen or so accounts listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fifidonis/Archive isn't you, despite that being considered likely by a Checkuser (and the behavioural evidence seems to agree). Huon (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocks based on Confirmed and Likely Checkuser results are generally not overturned. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 05:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happyfunday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my conduct is not connected in any way with the block, please check manually my editing habits and compare it to the Sockpuppet doer

Decline reason:

So you thought creating another sock was a good way to make your case? Kinu ^t/_c 22:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happyfunday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i don't know how to delete or you can ban forever my other account because that will make another sock, sorry for that and i promise i will never do that again in the future, i may edit from different IPs because my different internet connections but this is my only account beside the new Usernamahappy which is banned and is created by me just to justify my last edit that admin changed for no reason but in this case i'm blocked because i use the same IP range with Fifidonis which my conduct is not connected in any way with the block, what should i do to prove that Fifidonis is not related with me, please check again my editing habits and just like i said in other account if my wrong is reverting the admin Kww changes then admin needs to give reasons what is wrong with my edit, if i did wrong with my edit that deserve to be blocked i promise i will never do that again and sorry for deleting the unblock reviewed before, i didn't read that you are not allowed to delete it, i will never do that again. And for everything if i did something wrong, i promise i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions in the future.--Happyfunday (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the shared interest in "List of awards and nominations received by X" articles and awards sections, on top of the technical evidence, I find it difficult to believe that you are not Fifidonis. Huon (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, the Checkuser results came back matching you to two other accounts and stating there was a very high likelihood those accounts and this were part of two larger sockfarms. Checkuser checks more than just the IP address, and so a Confirmed or Likely result all but precludes an unblock. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 23:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What should i do to prove those accounts are not related with me?--Happyfunday (talk) 00:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can't prove a negative, and in any case the Checkuser has more or less definitively proven that two other accounts, if not more, are yours. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gaon Chart K-Pop Awards logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gaon Chart K-Pop Awards logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]