User talk:Harlowan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Harlowan, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Harlowan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Harlowan, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 04:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Henrikh Mkhitaryan[edit]

Hi, Mkhitaryan was not part of the matchday squad, as part of the starting line-up or as a substitute, for the 2013 final so played no part in the competition. Therefore, it can't be listed as an honour when he had no part in the victory. Kosack (talk) 07:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whether it was due to injury or not is irrelevant. Not crediting him with winning a trophy that he didn't even play for is common sense in my opinion and certainly not original research, especially when you provide two sources, one of which (transfermarkt) is not even classed as a reliable source. This sort of thing has been brought up before, see Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo#Super Cup 2016 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 105#Honours (for the 1,00000000th time) as examples of the mammoth discussions that have gone on over this issue. In all honesty, I struggle to understand how a player who played absolutely no part in a tournament can be classed as winning it. Kosack (talk) 23:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I never said either discussion helped my position, my point was that there is no clear consensus on this sort of situation. I'm not sure how you presume there is a consensus in your favour when neither discussion reaches that point in anyway. Really WP:COMMONSENSE should prevail in these moments but obviously it quite often doesn't. Kosack (talk) 07:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]