User talk:Harrias/Archive 28
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Harrias. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Possible copy vio
Greetings oh mighty admin. May this humble one crave the illumination of your wisdom? I have a suspicion that Vivienne Goonewardene, currently at GAN, may have chunks of copy vio in it. I may well be entirely wrong. Is there someone or somewhere where I could refer it for a more rigorous check than Earwig? This unworthy one abases themselves that you may deign to consider out most impudent request. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Gog the Mild: Ha, laying it on a tad thick! The other tool I use if there is a specific site you are concerned with is the Duplication Detector, but honestly, once you get to a certain point, it needs to be a pretty manual check. Harrias (he/him) • talk 06:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I dunno, one is convinced that the tools bestow near god-like powers, then it turns out that an admin is a mere mortal with a couple of apps. I shall have to check if my insurance policy covers shattered illusions. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Gale
Hello Ben, I hope you're well. If I recall correctly (and I might not of course!) you have (or at least had) access to Gale? If it's still the case, would you be able to look a couple of bits up for me please? If not, or it's a non-starter, no problem at all. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 17:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Yeah, still have access, what are you after? Harrias (he/him) • talk 20:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Sadly only a virtual one
Your map making skills are impressive enough, but the speed with which you can put one together is startling. You saved my blushes and I owe you a(nother) pint. Please accept this until the real thing turns up. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC) |
- @Gog the Mild: Cheers! Harrias (he/him) • talk 20:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Old Style
Hey Harrias, somehow I always want to say Harry if I'm referring you; I guess I've seen Harry Poter to much. ;) Back to business; I have a question for you. Since you're conquering the English Civil War (or whatever you're working on today) shouldn't the dates of the articles not use at least a footnote stating that all sources are written in the Old Style, or every date should have an {{OldStyleDate}} template per MOS:OSNS? And I don't think most people know that the Britons used Old Style in their dates before 14 September 1752 (If people even knew what the Old Style is at all!). Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 00:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- @CPA-5: Sorry for the delayed response, I read this at the time, but I'm stupid busy offline at the moment. I get your point, but I'm honestly not convinced that it is worth it. Most readers won't be aware of OS/NS anyway; even those that are won't necessarily be aware of when the cut offs are particularly. That said, I haven't read the MOS article you linked, so maybe I should! Harrias (he/him) • talk 21:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Harrias, hope you are well. Just wanted to say....I mentioned at one of my current FLCs that I didn't think the above-named article (which at the time consisted of a single-sentence lead and a bullet-point list of year and nothing else) could be improved to FL status, but you were supportive of the idea that it could. Just thought you might be interested to see what I have managed to do with it over the last couple of days.......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @ChrisTheDude: Nice work: it is different to what I had been thinking, but it works well, I think. I wonder if you could/should fit in another column for the song that was at number one for the longest each year? Just an idea, feel free to ignore it if you don't think it viable/worth it. Harrias (he/him) • talk 20:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Good idea! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were Hog Farm (submissions), HaEr48 (submissions), Harrias (submissions) and Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
- Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
- Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
- MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Thomas Crump
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Crump you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
October backlog drive
Hi Harrias! The time is now to start publicizing the October backlog drive (probably it's even a little late). I've got the banner up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/October 2020/banner and if time allows, it would be great to have some help dropping messages about it.
Your GA nomination of Thomas Crump
The article Thomas Crump you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Crump for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
October 2020 GAN Backlog drive
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
Thank you for conducting 3 reviews in the October 2020 GAN Backlog drive and for co-ordinating the drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 48%. Regards, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
WikiCup Awards
Congratulations! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
... thank you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello - I saw your interest in Women in Sports at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Members and wanted to extend an invitation:
Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women in sports!
We'd like to invite you to learn more about Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in sports. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Participants page or visit one of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport/Task forces for specific sports. Thanks!
Looks like you already do a bit for the Cricket taskforce - thank you. There are several taskforces for other sports: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport/Task forces and opportunity to create new ones.
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks! |
Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Hello Harrias: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, MWright96 (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas Harrias | |
Hi Harrias, just wishing you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
Happy First Edit Day!
Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
The WikiChevrons | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the WikiChevrons for participating in 15 reviews between October and December 2020. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your distinguished career. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Girth Summit submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- Harrias is a 15 year veteran with over 500 articles created and yet, in all that time, appears never to have received this award, which seems odd. He has been enormously helpful with reviewing and contributing to several articles I've written, and I see him regularly contributing to the MilHist and FAC processes. He consistently offers advice which is constructively critical, content-focussed and founded in a deep knowledge both of subject matter and wiki-savoir-faire. He is approachable and enormously helpful to new and experienced editors alike. He has taught himself .svg mapmaking in order to produce high quality maps, several of which grace FAs. He amends existing maps at short notice in order to help FAC nominators keep grouchy reviewers happy. He actively participates in the WikiCup and is a newly elected coordinator at MilHist. A truly deserving recipient.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Remains of St Michael's Church at the summit of Glastonbury Tor |
Harrias |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning January 17, 2021 |
15 year veteran with over 500 articles created. Enormously helpful reviewing and contributing to many other articles. A regular contributor to the MilHist and FAC processes. Offers constructively critical advice that is content-focussed and founded in subject matter and wiki-savoir-faire. Approachable and enormously helpful to all editors. Produces and amends high quality maps, several of which grace FAs. Active participant in the WikiCup competition and is a newly elected coordinator at MilHist. zed --> |
Recognized for |
helping increase the coverage of women on Wikipedia |
Notable work |
Somerset County Cricket Club |
Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 16:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of international cricket centuries by Gordon Greenidge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international cricket centuries by Gordon Greenidge, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Gordon Greenidge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Harrias. I'm just posting to let you know that PCA Player of the Year – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 March newsletter
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
- Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
- Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
- ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
- Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
- Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
- The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
- Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
- Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
- Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
- Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Kiribati politicians
Hi, thanks for your contributions. Please note that "politician" is not linked unless there's a very good reason. Same for all commonly known terms. Please write "is a member" (m, not M), rather than "serves as a member". Only cap words that are proper names. Thanks. Tony (talk) 02:36, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Using your book sources
Hi Harrias, hope all is well. I'm building a library for the cricket project and wondered if I could add your cricket books to it? Would it also be possible for me to list your name next to the entry incase anyone wishes to ask for you extracts? StickyWicket (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- @AssociateAffiliate: Sure. my bookshelf lists a fair number of them, though I have many, many more - mostly obscure Victorian era stuff. Harrias (he/him) • talk 16:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Harrias thank you. I'll copy them across to The Library. We're having a bit of a problem with Victorian era FC cricketers at the moment who played a handful of matches being nominated for deletion, so the Victorian era stuff might come in handy. The more the merrier! All the best, StickyWicket (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Seeing from your books on the booklist what a fan of Somerset you are, I can recommend Alan Gibson's Growing Up With Cricket if you don't already have it. A substantial portion is about Somerset cricket, and it's a very entertaining read. JH (talk page) 08:32, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Jhall1: Cheers, another one for the wish list! Harrias (he/him) • talk 10:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 May newsletter
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
- The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
- Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
- Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
- Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
- Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
- Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
- Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
- Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.
Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive | |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 July newsletter
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
- The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
- Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
- Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
- Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
- Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
- BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.
In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Seven years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Red (Taylor Swift album) peer review
Hello Harrias, I have opened a peer review for Red prior to taking it to FAC. I am reaching out as you commented on Blank Space's FAC. If you have the time and are willing, I would greatly appreciate any comment or advice that you could give at the review. If you are unable, that is totally fine as well. Thank you! --TheSandDoctor Talk 01:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Drat!
I noticed that Grylls Monument didn't exist, and decided to throw something together (from my phone!) - in checking to see if we had a photo on Commons, I found User:Harrias/Grylls Monument. Great minds etc. Would it be okay with you if I moved it to mainspace? ~TNT (she/they • talk) 09:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- On second thoughts, I'm going employ the old saying of it's easier to ask forgiveness than it is to get permission - have moved it and will make some edits. Thank you for writing it, have a great day! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 09:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @TheresNoTime: No worries from me. I probably have a load of these old projects that I started and then gave up / forgot in my drafts, really need to do something about them! Harrias (he/him) • talk 15:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Robert Woodman (English allrounder)
Please dont delete the page i created beacause i have edited the correct information Hahnxj (talk) 14:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Craig Lewis (Irish Cricketer)
Please dont the page i have created because i have edited the correct information Hahnxj (talk) 14:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018
Hi Harrias - hope you are well. Great work with expanding this page. Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 7, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 7, 2021. Congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 18:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you today for the article, introduced: "The Battle of Babylon Hill of little more than an early skirmish of the First English Civil War. Both sides were inexperienced and still learning the art of war. As such, the description of this engagement as "more muddle than battle" is fitting. Ralph Hopton was considered one of the more able of the Royalist leaders, and yet here he found himself needlessly ambushed by the enemy."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018
The article South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018
The article South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
DYK for South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018
On 24 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the second match of South Africa women's tour of England in 2018 was the first time a women's international cricket match had featured three centuries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
You got a several Four Awards!
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Somerset County Cricket Club in 2009. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC) |
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Battle of Babylon Hill. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC) |
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Battle of Marshall's Elm. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC) |
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on 2009 Women's Cricket World Cup Final. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC) |
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on 2010 Twenty20 Cup Final. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC) |
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between July and September 2021. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 03:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:
- The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
- Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
- Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
- Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
- Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
- Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points
All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
- Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Harrias, hope all is well. I wonder if you'd be able to spare some time to review John Manners' article? It is a GA right now and I'm hoping to get it to FA this year. Cheers, StickyWicket (talk) 16:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
- Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
- AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
- Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
- GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
- Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
- SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
- Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)