User talk:Hemantjha

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Valparai because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 06:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vijay Malhotra (Yogiraj)[edit]

The article Vijay Malhotra (Yogiraj) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Yash! ^[talk] 11:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glance Platform[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glance Platform, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 13:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Hemantjha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24933 was submitted on Apr 26, 2019 16:48:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hemantjha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will always be neutral in editing and will always make a productive contribution. I understood my reason for the block, will not do it again

Decline reason:

In order for us to consider an unblock, please list the clients and employers that have paid you to edit Wikipedia in accordance with the terms of use. Furthermore, why is this behavior contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia? MER-C 20:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hemantjha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the first time I tried creating the product page - this is a false claim of payments or anything. I have trust in Wikipedia, and can't use this platform for any monetary purposes. I understood my mistake, the tone of the content was on the promotional side. Furthermore, I am never going to create any product page in the future and always try to contribute for productive and informative reason

Decline reason:

You not using Wikipedia for 'monetary purposes' does not mean you are not being paid to edit. Until you are willing to list your clients per the Terms of Use as asked by MER-C, and also do as they ask and answer their question, there no pathway to being unblocked for you. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.