User talk:Hey Angie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Hey Angie! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 07:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone created a page in mainspace called Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak on 10 March 2024, so Draft:Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak has been nominated for deletion.

Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sidharth Malhotra, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically see MOS:QUOTE. Part of your edit has been reverted which is shown here - https://w.wiki/9beY Leoneix (talk) 05:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sidharth Malhotra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shershah. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempting to add names of non-notable awards[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain in detail where I added names of non notable awards?? Be clear in your words, I am not able to understand. Hey Angie (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm referring to "Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival" awards; that is one of many non-notable festivals that pretend to be affiliated with the Dadasaheb Phalke Award. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On which page have I added that?? Please be precise so that I can clearly understand my mistakes. Hey Angie (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure this is yet another sock of Sssaaraa and their 50 other connected accounts. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 21:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hey Angie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sir all that I have contributed to Wikipedia is through whatever I have learnt from the Welcome message you guys sent me and from other users edits. Firstl, I will like to tell you I have no connection with the account you guys are talking about and secondly, if I have committed a mistake or have done any wrong edits, I am sorry. I promise to not repeat them at any cost. Also sir, I really wish to continue editing Wikipedia, please give me one more chance. Hey Angie (talk) 10:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One of the clearest cases of  Confirmed sockpuppetry I've seen in my time as a checkuser. Yamla (talk) 11:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.