User talk:Hispring

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Hispring, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anad base drone strike has been accepted[edit]

Anad base drone strike, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your copy edit request[edit]

Hello, Hispring. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Asghar Vesali at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! MrClog (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AloPeyk (September 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More or less, it is an advertorial in its current form. Should be rewritten from scratch.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AloPeyk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AloPeyk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hispring! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HitroMilanese: thanks for reviewing the draft. As you can see, I tried to edit the draft and remove the Tone of voice in advertising. But you believe that the problem remains. I wonder if you underline to me the exact sentence that you think it needs to fix.Hispring (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, the words like "providing", "service provider", etc. give the sense that the content is trying to outline the working structure of the country, this is not good for an encyclopedic article. The content should be informative not promotive. "Users can send delivery requests via Android, iOS or a Web-based application", that is suitable for the official website of the company, not for an encyclopedic article. I will suggest you to rewrite the content and keep it precise. Make sure to demonstrate notability per WP:NCORP, specially WP:CORPDEPTH. Regards. Hitro talk 06:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AloPeyk (October 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Delta fiver was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Language used in the article to describe the subject, seems too informal for the Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AloPeyk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AloPeyk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 15:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Delta fiver: thanks for reviewing the draft! unfortunately, I can't get your mean by "Language used in the article to describe the subject, seems too informal for the Wikipedia".Which word or which sentences has the mentioned problem? I wonder if you give me a favor and show them to me?Hispring (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, what I meant by the language being informal is that articles have to be well written for example, instead of saying the startup’s CEO, said, it's preferred here to use the CEO mention that or CEO stated that, also another important thing to mention is that, what ever has been quoted or said by someone else, has to be within two beginning and ending quotations. Take a look at articles like Uber Eats, try to identify and mimic the language used there in your article. Good luck. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 19:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Delta fiver: thanks for explaining the issues in detail. I tried to fix them. Can I ask you to take a look at it?Hispring (talk) 11:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AloPeyk (December 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AloPeyk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AloPeyk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: thanks for review the article. I took a look at articles like Uber Eats and snapp!, then try to use the used language in my article. If my article bothers from advertisement words, that articles bother from it too. However, they had gotten permission to publish in Wikipedia, Alopeyk was rejected. Isn't it a double standard?Hispring (talk) 12:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see other stuff exists the existence of other poor quality articles is not an excuse to create another, your draft was declined, not rejected, it can be improved and accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 18:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong:Your concerns are understandable. I have reviewed other articles like Uber and snapp!, and I tried to use the same construction and language used in those articles in mine. Therefore if my article has problems with using advertisement words, then must it also be for Uber and Snapp! articles. I have tried to do my best to publish an article that follows wikipedia policies. I tried my article to be non-advertisement and have a neutral point of view. In the way, I used the advice of another user or the second reviewer said to me, try to identify and mimic the language used Uber Eats in my article. Therefore I need you specifically mention which parts have problems and need to be revised. I hope this is going to be my final revision.Hispring (talk) 10:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Hispring! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, AloPeyk, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:AloPeyk has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AloPeyk. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:AloPeyk has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AloPeyk. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AloPeyk (December 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Martin Urbanec was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AloPeyk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AloPeyk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AloPeyk[edit]

Hello, Hispring. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AloPeyk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 21:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]