User talk:Hsch31

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Hsch31/sandbox (October 20)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hsch31/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 19:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 02:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the Wikipedia nothing to bring the Standard Model with all particles in one construction for the normal man without the "professional necessary quantum" Lagrange proceeding for each particle?[edit]

Gell-Mann detected the 3 quarks only by construction with selected Kaons having a third parameter (strangeness -1, 0, +1) as well as the Omega baryon with strangeness -3. From a construction all entangled particles could be seen at once (e.g. Up and up) and the 7 planes of different charges W with the center point the Higgs-particle as well the Neutinos and Gluons... I can't see why the most popular consulted Wikipedia should be against a newer peering only why the mathematical model should be "more professionnel" but seldom understood Hsch31 (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What can Wikipedia do for the common man?[edit]

Not to much Mathematics, but bring Pictures & constructions; if there are you should not mistrust if the high science even clould publish constructions with 4 matter generations and the particle physics still not knows why there are only three. The CERN brick box has hundreds of the same pictures, but something news would be sure more interesting. And Gell-Mann detected the Quarks and the Omega baryon only with the Kaon construction, which can easy be extended to the "Standard Model", because 3 Euclidic points (on the same charge W) lie always on a circle line, all resulting with 7 planes, what the common man can better see than a long Lagrange -1/4 Formula with 18 constants. The best end then for Wikipedia: more readers and perhaps more donors. Hsch31 (talk) 06:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Up, Charm, Top : all threeQuarks together overthrown accumulated?[edit]

ziuerst kommt die Euklid'sche Geometrie: alle 3 auf Kreislinie Spin 1/2 mit Strangenes dann kommt der PAULI : vis a vis 3 Gegenquarks mit umgekehrtem Spin verschränkt, dann kommt das QCD: Da 3 Durchmesser durch das Zentrum gehen, nochmals 3 Quarks.,also total 9 Quarks mal 2 Ebenen (2/3 & -1/3) = 18 Quarks; dann kommt DIRAC mit der Zentum-Symmetrie durch das Higgs-Zentrum mit nochmals 18 ANTI-Quarks dann erfolgt die Projektion auf den 1-Spin Bosonenkreis mit den 6 Dreiecken: Die projektierten Quarks sind die exakten Schwerpunkte dieser Dreiecke, die 3 Durchmesser-Linien durchqueren.und den Bosonenkreis schneiden. Auf diesen Kreuzpunkten sitzen 6 Gluonen; die beiden andern sitzen auf der Spinachse, +seitig Gluon 7 für das Proton und - seitig Gluon 8 für das Neutron. Damit ist die Quark-Gluonenmasse abgeschlossen. --Hsch31 (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What I learnt as chemist about Pauli is wrong in the particle physics?[edit]

As Chemist we have more to do with the electrons, as all chemical bonds have at least 2 electrons, one upspin and the other downspin, but never uniforme! Each electron is different from all others. But in the particle physics there should be that 3 different Quarks (Up, Charm & Top) should have on one place (2/3+) with the same spin(1/2). Are Quarks and Electrons so different? I learned that Halfspin-Particles don't tolerate one other on the same place in contrary to the Bosons. Why can the CERN Standardmodel put 4 times 3 halfspin particles together on the same place? Because there is no Model but only singular particles without any connection ? But if Gell-Mann could construct the (main)-places of the QuantParticles, why had it to abandon all and leave the field to Lagrange without the necessary right angle strangeness coordinate? --Hsch31 (talk) 19:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hsch31/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Hsch31/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 16:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hsch31! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah ^💬 16:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Hsch31/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Hsch31. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Hsch31/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Hsch31/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Hsch31. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]