User talk:Huey Newton and the News

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old Trafford[edit]

If you are inferring a 2:1 ratio from "greater regularity", then it is you that has the problem with the wording. Adding qualifiers like "far" and "decidedly" is POV and therefore inappropriate for an article like this. – PeeJay 08:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome...

Hello, Huey Newton and the News, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Liqudluck✽talk 18:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Some pages you might like to check out are:


P.S.S. I noticed that edit a few minutes ago where you made the background of your name blue, and was wondering if you were trying to make a signature. If you want to make it your permanent signature on Wikipedia and aren't sure how, enter the same code you added here onto this page, in the white text box that says signature and check the box beneath it. If you already know how, ignore that. Happy editing! Liqudluck✽talk 18:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Huey Newton and the News. Thank you. – PeeJay 12:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of the world vandalism[edit]

I'm not going to get into discussion with you about the larger point but a content dispute is not vandalism. This edit summary was inappropriate. You had already mentioned this at Talk:Old_Trafford#Jamie_Lyon and it was clear from User:PeeJay2K3 that he simply had an alternative opinion on the matter. Vandalism has a very specific meaning here and its usage should not be thrown around lightly. Assume good faith and work on actually convincing the others of your view, not just asserting it with snide remarks like this. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 12:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Old Trafford, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop screwing around with Old Trafford. This is beyond misleading and is now approaching disruptive. Get a consensus to include the image or you'll be blocked. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Glenn Beck. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Beck's inclusion in these categories doesn't appear to be supported by the current text. Please keep information in WP:BLPs clearly sourced. Onorem♠Dil 19:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your contributions to the pages Anna Belknap and Sinead Keenan. Unfortunately, the edits had to be reverted, as they did not have proper reference citations. Please ensure that when you add information to biographies of living people that you include citations, as this ensures that no libelous information is found on Wikipedia. Thank you, again, for your contributions, and happy editing. Jhfortier (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BLP violations[edit]

Edits such as [1] are simply unacceptable. Do it once more and I'll block you indefinitely. Tim Song (talk) 22:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser[edit]

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 18:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huey_Newton_and_the_News&oldid=1049184723"