User talk:HutheMeow
Thanks for creating this article, he sounds like someone who is long overdue an article and there are so many Kazakh topics missing. Can you please add your sources? All articles require sources, and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to start that off. If you need any further help, please just ask. Your contributions are very welcome. Boleyn (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Garfi[edit]
Hello HutheMeow,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Garfi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Roxy the dog. bark 06:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Garfi[edit]
Hello HutheMeow,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Garfi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Roxy the dog. bark 22:01, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Ryszard Linkiewicz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Ryszard Linkiewicz moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Ryszard Linkiewicz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 23:38, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Ryszard Linkiewicz for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryszard Linkiewicz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryszard Linkiewicz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Speedy deletion nomination of Don Stits[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Don Stits requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2Joules (talk) 07:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Robert H. Starr[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Robert H. Starr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2Joules (talk) 07:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ben Phillips (youtuber)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ben Phillips (youtuber) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Redalert2fan (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018[edit]
Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Redalert2fan (talk) 10:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Hello, HutheMeow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Redalert2fan (talk) 10:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Don Mitchell (aircraft designer)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Don Mitchell (aircraft designer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 11:10, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Robert H. Starr[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Robert H. Starr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 14:42, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ben Phillips (youtuber)[edit]
Hello HutheMeow,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ben Phillips (youtuber) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Meatsgains(talk) 02:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Ben Phillips (youtuber)[edit]
Hello, HutheMeow,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ben Phillips (youtuber) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Phillips (youtuber) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Meatsgains(talk) 02:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Garfi (cat) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garfi (cat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garfi (cat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, HutheMeow. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Joanne Garfi (author), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Joanne Garfi (author) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks,
Meatsgains(talk) 01:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tatiana Edel[edit]
Hello HutheMeow,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tatiana Edel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:49, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Semi-Protection Template[edit]
HutheMeow -- the semi-protection edit request template you added to your talk page calls your fellow editors to the page. Please do not repost the template. Thanks! -- Dolotta (talk) 23:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Garfi (cat) moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Garfi (cat), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 08:59, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Frank Klausz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 03:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Frank Klausz[edit]
Hello HutheMeow,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Frank Klausz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
HutheMeow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I never abused any accounts at all. I have never a sockpuppetreer. I didnt do anything thats wrong. That block must have been a big mistake.
Decline reason:
So let me understand what's going on here... three accounts, found to be operated by the same person, post substantially similar block appeals within ten minutes of each other. Totally legit. MER-C 10:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HutheMeow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My account was hacked is the reason why the bad stuff happened and it was unnoticed, I didnt do anything thats bad at all, I didnt do any sockpuppetry, I have absolutely nothing to do with the bad stuff, I swear to god that I am telling the truth. I really think that my block should be removed for the reasons above
Decline reason:
Thanks for letting us know your account was compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, you are no longer eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The reason that I wrote on my second unblock request is a lie. I wrote this because I was stressed about being blocked indefinitely. My account has never been hacked but still should be unblocked. My account is not compromised and never has been before. Sorry for my lies. I am serious. HutheMeow
HutheMeow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I realise that I have been been blocked as a sock puppet of SamuilKrasavtsev. I definitely did abuse multiple accounts. Sock puppetry is the use of 2 or more accounts in the same IP address which is also contributing to the same page or talk with multiple accounts (a person operating more than 1 account in the same IP) and being tied to accounts. I didn't know that using more than 1 account in the same IP address is sock puppetry. I am not going to violate WP:Sock again. This account will be only used by 1 individual. If I am unblocked, I will edit articles about aviation and biographies. It was a bad idea not to read about Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. My account is not compromised and never has been. I am not going to break other policies. Copyright is using someone else's work and claiming that it's your own work. Please trust me to edit Wikipedia again. I should be unblocked because I learned my lesson from sock puppetry and won't ever do this again. I will be a good editor. What a big mistake I made of using multiple accounts in the same IP. We all make mistakes and I think think carefully before making further decisions. I will make useful contributions and will not cause disruptions. Please trust me to edit again because I learned my lesson from socking and will not repeat again. I am not going to breach community trust again and this is exact what sockpuppetry is and it's a serious breach of community trust. Shame on me for socking, but what a good thing that I didn't do this on other Wikimedia sites.
Decline reason:
Please log into SamuilKrasavtsev and request an unblock there. PhilKnight (talk) 10:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not eligible for unblock consideration here for three reasons. First, you have stated this account was compromised. That you later retracted this is irrelevant. Second, this is a confirmed sockpuppet account; you are only eligible for unblock consideration on your original account. Third, you have been so abusive that you are probably defacto banned rather than blocked. I have revoked talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. Another admin will be along shortly to review your request. --Yamla (talk) 10:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Garfi (cat)[edit]
Hello, HutheMeow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Garfi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rollidan (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
HutheMeow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #25926 was submitted on Jul 16, 2019 20:29:38. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Joanne Garfi for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Garfi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.