User talk:Hyacinth/February 5 2012 - January 6 2013

Shape

Please have a look e.g. at the Dutch articles linked to Shape and de:Gestalt. It should become obvious that it doesn't make sense to merge these two meanings. --217.224.250.60 (talk) 20:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Hyacinth,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Hi !

My name is Alexandre Kamouaa user:Kamouaa, I am a exchange student at Michigan State University, currently working on an exploration of the Wikipedia adminship process through a group project. As you may know, for this team work led by Dr Jonathan Obar, we need to interview Wikipedia administrators, and I would like to set up an interview date on Skype with you. Would you be available on Monday April 23rd, and if you are, at what time? Thank you in advance for your help and your participation in this project.

Looking forward to hear from you soon,

Alexandre Kamouaa - user:Kamouaa - --Kamouaa (talk) 15:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good! Are you available at 7 PM MT on Monday?

Alexandre Kamouaa --Kamouaa (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

My Skype ID is alexkamouaa, but if you are experiencing problems with your computers, would you prefer if I send you an e-mail with the questions?

Alexandre Kamouaa --Kamouaa (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Gil Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that there's a discussion at Talk:Slide (disambiguation) that might interest you. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 08184e785dc33afd1baf692c7331453a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky once again

A couple of years ago you contributed input for the peer review of Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, especially regarding the article's coverage of the composer's homosexuality and marriage. The article eventually passed to FA status but is now being revamped and expanded to include additional research and sources. While I have reworked the portions on Tchaikovsky's engagement to Désirée Artôt and his marriage to Antonina Miliukova, I have not yet tackled the preceding section on his sexuality, which is brief but seems to-the-point and NPOV. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate any suggestions on whether more needs to be done at this point and, if so, what might improve it. Thanks very much for your help. Jonyungk (talk) 07:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me and pointing out the challenge with language. Since you are much more attuned to the situation and potential solutions than I, could you please act with me in improving it? Even if this amounts to pointing out other instances for me to fix, it will be a greater benefit to the article and its readers than no help at all. I would greatly appreciate your expertise and effort in this matter. Jonyungk (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

The style guide really helps. I've already employed it in editing the Sexuality section and will post a link to it on Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky to avoid reverts to inappropriate language—a problem when the language issue came up in PR. Thanks. Jonyungk (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

You could write a book

Fiction novels may be your specialty, and maybe in such a novel a supertonic chromatic chord equals a secondary dominant. Sadly, it is only a way for one musicologist to describe the secondary dominant of the primary dominant of the key (hence its name). Only someone with zero understanding of the subject could create that redirect, not to mention your other edits. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 04:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

As I said before, comment on the content. Hyacinth (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Wind Quintet No. 4 (Perle), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Reply requested

Please explain why you followed me to the Civility page. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 15:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Oriental riff

You don't get to invent tags that don't exist and treat them as if they were real. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 17:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Music theory

Hi! I notice that you often edit articles within WikiProject Music theory. Had you thought of joining the project? I'm sure your contribution would be welcome. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Crab canon

Hi, Hyacinth. Last November you uploaded an image, File:Crab canon.png, which is currently being used to illustrate the article Crab canon. On that article's talk page, a reader notes a flaw in the example, possibly Riemann's error, possibly a copying mistake. Could you check this out, please?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

List of pitch intervals

Hi! Thanks for the warm welcome, will do. I'm a Wikipedia heavy user. I'm making a new kind of musical program, and thought I could make a tool to get the Pitch Interval's names and values from Wikipedia. So I did write a script that parses the table, and so I could check the data's accuracy easily. Peterhil (talk)

Image (logo) added by owners of that logo (a community college in US)

File:HTC logo vert blue.jpg has been added by staff at the institution (Hennepin Technical College) whose logo it is. Does this violate any wikipedia policy on images? If so what can they do to put it in compliance? --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. When you recently edited Quintus (vocal music), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Altus and Bassus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Clef

Go to the bottom of Talk:Clef and see a question. Georgia guy (talk) 16:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Leading-tone Triad

Why did you delete this page? There is no reason for it. It is entirely different than the article you moved it towards. There in fact can be diminished triads based on other scale-degrees. This is a separate section in theory textbooks and should be dealt accordingly. Especially since there is a leading-tone seventh chord and secondary leading-tone chord page. You continue these unjust actions without reason. — Devin.chaloux (chat) 00:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Leading-tone triad was a page under the aegis of the WP:Music Theory group. Any merging of that page (as well as any other page under the WP:Music Theory banner) should be discussed and a consensus reached before anything is done with it. I suggest you un-merge that page and put it back the way it was, and then we can begin to discuss what you feel are the issues. -- 07:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kosboot (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. When you recently edited Circle progression, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turnaround (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Ongoing rudeness

If you like quoting policies, get acquainted with a new one... not to mention WP:EW while refusing to do as little as state a reason for your continuous reverts. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 08:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Circle of fifths ascend within octave.mid

Thank you for uploading File:Circle of fifths ascend within octave.mid. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of quartal pieces

The article List of quartal pieces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No context, no explanation of what "quartal" means, making verification impossible. Only source makes no mention of "quartal" anything.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of quartal pieces for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of quartal pieces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of quartal pieces until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

• How about explaining what the heck you mean by a "quartal piece"? That term gets 56 hits on Google, so I don't think it's a thing. Knowing my music theory, quartals are all over the place, so listing any piece with them would result in a list of every song that ever existed. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited Concert pitch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical performance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Dominant (music)

Check out something I posted at the talk page of Talk:Dominant (music). It's about the image in the article with a chord progression. Georgia guy (talk) 12:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: List of pieces which use the whole tone scale

Hello Hyacinth, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of List of pieces which use the whole tone scale, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is content to identify the subject of the article, take it to WP:PROD or WP:AFD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GB fan 22:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: List of musical pieces which use extended techniques

Hello Hyacinth, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of List of musical pieces which use extended techniques, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This needs to go to AFD or Prod. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GB fan 22:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Questions about your musical example of Later Folia

I make reference to this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Later_Folia.png

Here are my questions (forgive me if my use of english musical terms is not fully correct, I know the italian ones but are unsure about the correct translation):

1. from the numbers below each note - that I assume refers to the tonality (key?) - I deduce the example is in the tonality (key?) of G minor (sol minore). But then in the key signature at the beginning of the staff, beyond a B flat (Si bemolle) shouldn't there also be an E flat (Mi bemolle)?

2. I understand from your use of "bVII" under the note in the fourth bar that you use the Roman numeral analysis. Isn't this a bit confusing if at the same time you put accidents in the key signature? For example, the "bVII" tells that the subtonic (F natural) is used instead of the leading note (F sharp) one would expect in a harmonic/melodic minor scale, while from reading a key signature with a B flat and an E flat and a piece starting in G noted as the tonic I would have expected to read in the score an F natural with the natural explicitly written.

3. Related to 2., given you have a B flat in the key signature isn't the "bIII" in the fifth bar somewhat misleading? In the Wikipedia page on mediant (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediant) I have not found "bIII" but only "bIII+". From what I understand there, the "+" refers to the fact that it is an augmented chord, which I think should be the case here assuming the chord is Bflat-D-Fsharp, while I do not understand why a "b" is used before "III" here, given that B flat is in the key signature.

I would be glad if you could clarify me thess issuee. I have not a wikipedia account, but you can answer me at enriconardelli60 at gmail dot com or here as you prefer.

Thanks...Enrico — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.33.197.172 (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Hyacinth, I copied here below your answer in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2.33.197.172, assuming it's better to have question and answer in the same place. Please advice me if there is a different policy to follow. EnricoN60 (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Given the key signature it would be more like Dorian mode than g minor. See Roman numeral analysis for some information about roman numeral analysis and subtonic for some information about ♭VII. The symbols are not misleading, but indicate the chord built on the flattened or minor scale-degree or interval (B♭/minor third and F/minor seventh) above G, and as you may see the example is cited and follows the source. Hyacinth (talk) 01:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your pointing out the musical example is a Dorian mode on G. This clarification answers my questions number 1 and 2.

I wonder whether adding the info "Dorian mode on G" to the caption of your picture in Folia would make it more easy to use and to understand to the reader. I do not know whether that caption was written by you or not. In any case, would you object to such an edit to that caption?

Thanks also for the references to Roman numeral analysis and subtonic, which I had consulted before writing. Indeed, question number 2 was not on the use of ♭VII but on the fact that "I would have expected to read in the score an F natural with the natural explicitly written", which is now clarified by your explanation the example is a Dorian mode on G.

It remains open my question 3 on the use of ♭III. The assumption your example is a Dorian mode on G implies the third degree of such a scale is a ♭B. But a ♭B is already in the key signature of your example. So I am puzzled why in your example under the B in the fifth bar is not a III used instead of a ♭III.

I would be glad to learn more.

Thanks...Enrico. EnricoN60 (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Gamelan

Thank you for elaborating and enriching the gamelan terminology and providing sources. I'm familiar with those terms, (karawitan etc.) yet unable to provides literature references. The article is better thanks to you. Cheers..! Gunkarta (talk) 01:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Scale degree illustration

I asked on the talk page of Key (music) why the scale-degree diagram was in the intro, and suggested removing it. Getting no reply, I went ahead and did so, but now you have replaced it. I don't see what the scale-degree names have to do with the opening section of Key (music); it only seems related in a global sense. The circle-of-fifths diagram makes some sense (although it's a subsidiary topic), since at least it's referenced in the intro section now. But the scale-degree names seem likely to confuse readers more than enlighten them. —Wahoofive (talk) 15:57, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Chrysalifourfour

Hello to you too :-) Is there something you wanted to tell me? I've just commented on Diminution talk page; once again, thanks for the fruitful resolution and I hope I didn't cause too much of an inconvenience. I usually write and edit articles in the Greek Wikipedia, but I regularly check my English talk page. If there's anything you should like to point to me out, please send me a message; I'll be more than happy to help out. Greetings :-) --Chrysalifourfour (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Summary

Okay, mea culpa. I'll keep that in mind for next time I do some editing. What about the main image (facsimile)? Do you agree in cropping it and keeping the musical examples only, after all? --Chrysalifourfour (talk) 12:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Record track

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. *Adjkasi* (talk) 07:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Asking for your help

Hyacinth, would you mind to replace the figure showing the Ab major scale (in Interval (music)#Diatonic and chromatic), with a similar one without the numbers 1 2 3 4 5? Thank you, Paolo.dL (talk) 17:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

What about File:Lab mayor escala.png? Hyacinth (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

The discending part is not necessary and confusing. I like your version, with the names of the notes below, but you also added the five scale degrees above, from C to G. These were great in Interval (music)#Number, but not needed in Interval (music)#Diatonic and chromatic, where I inserted a copy of your figure. Paolo.dL (talk) 19:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

I did it myself. Paolo.dL (talk) 22:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your question

Hyacinth, you asked whether I thought File:3blind division.gif would benefit from the addition of clefs. I am sorry for the delay in responding: I am not ideologically wedded to the clef's absence but I did intentionally simplify things in this case. Redheylin (talk) 13:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, had to draw it "by hand", like a few of my efforts, using Fireworks. That's another reason. I am just thinking of non-readers: I want them to say "Hey, I can understand this". The flat indicates the clef. Redheylin (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

'Ode-to-Napoleon' hexachord

Can you please explain your reason for this revert? It appears to have done nothing but re-introduce the error I corrected.  -- WikHead (talk) 06:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

RM for "Musical scale"

Hyacinth, you expressed an interest in the title of Musical scale. After you did that, I initiated a formal RM action to change the name to Scale (music). Your comments would be welcome there, of course.

Noetica^Tea? 23:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Even if you don't want to post a comment, you might want to copy your support statement into the new section, as Woodstone did. Otherwise your opinion will not be considered in the formal RM discussion. Paolo.dL (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other

The article Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other for things which need to be addressed. Statυs (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

New article Ditonic scale

Greetings, thanks for adding the image/sound to the tritonic article; if you're inclined I've also added Ditonic scale. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Michael A. Levine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden mean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Prince Edmond de Polignac

No problem, do try to leave summaries when not having connectivity problems. Seems like you are a music editor too. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Howard Hanson

Hey. I don't know if you monitor the Howard Hanson article and I thought you might like to know, being a music theory buff, his important book "Harmonic Materials of Modern Music: Resources of the Tempered Scale" is now available in digital form for free. I put the links in the article. Also, the article says he received a Pulitzer Prize, but I notice he's not on your list. 98.154.203.28 (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Diatonic means constructed using two types of intervals

Bummer. You undid my contribution in the ditonic scale article distinguishing ditonic from diatonic. Here are multiple proofs that diatonic means constructed of two interval types (tones and semitones): http://www.thefreedictionary.com/diatonic merriam-webster.com britannica.com Please undo your undoing of my contribution. 98.154.203.28 (talk) 02:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your template merge suggestions

Your suggestion to merge templates {{Gamelan instruments}} and {{Gendhing}} to {{Gamelan}} is procedurally incorrect, as I have noted, and you're likely to get better feedback following the correct procedure at WP:TFD. Mark Hurd (talk) 02:29, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chicken Pickin'.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chicken Pickin'.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. When you recently edited Artist-in-residence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Residency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Regular tunings: Guitar

Hi Hyacinth!

I think that you would be a good person to review briefly my work on regular tunings for the guitar, which constitute a row in the footer-template for "guitar tunings". You know a lot about music.

If you have suggestions about major-thirds tuning, which I'd like to see become a good article, I'd be especially interested. (There do not seem to be enough very high quality reliable sources to bring it to FA level.)

Thanks! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Come back whenever you want! :)

Kiefer.Wolfowitz 17:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I spun-off regular tunings into an article. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 17:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Concerning Roger Reynolds

Dear Hyacinth,

I was going to make some changes to Roger Reynolds, but I backtracked and didn't end up changing anything yet. I'm doing a complete overhaul of his page (well, really I'm using the current page as an introduction, and I'm adding a ton of information). I backtracked because I didn't quite feel confident with the material yet, so I'm having several people proof it before I put it up. I'll let you know when I add the new information.

Thanks for your concern!

Best,

Phembree (talk) 18:27, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Again, Concerning Roger Reynolds

Dear Hyacinth,

I just noticed that you re-instantiated all of what I intended as pending additions. This is fine, I'll leave it up there - I'm going to continue proofing it and updating it. If you have time to give the article a read, I would appreciate any input.

Best,

Phembree (talk) 18:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rite of Spring main theme.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Rite of Spring main theme.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rite of Spring main theme.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rite of Spring main theme.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:StarWarsMainThemeSnippet.mid)

Thanks for uploading File:StarWarsMainThemeSnippet.mid. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Stockhausen's Gruppen

Thanks, Hyacinth, for correcting the mistakes in the tempo-duration example that appears at the beginning of Gruppen (Stockhausen). Unfortunately, two errors remain. First, the "M.M." values do not vary according to the "Unit", but rather are constant to a half note. This matters because it affects the durations of successive sections and, in the pitch analogy, the registers of the pitch classes. Second, the two rows of "duration proportions" should only have successive pairs of numbers, not a continuous chain of proportions. The first row in the original, for example, reads

2 : 10 / 12 : 7 / 5 : 9 / 7 : 2 / 3 : 5 / 10 : 4

That is to say, the proportions 10:12, 7:5, etc. are spurious. Similarly for the second line,

4 : 3 / 6 : 13 / 8 : 11 / 13 : 6 / 9 : 12

The vertical alignment is correct, so that with these corrections it will be seen that the second element in each proportion pair of the first row becomes the first element of a proportion in the second, and the reverse (10 becomes the 4 of 4 : 3, then the 3 becomes the 12 of 12 : 7, and so on). I don't mean to sound ungrateful. You have been doing terrific work with these illustrations, and especially for the sound examples. In this particular case, though, I wonder why the accompanying sound example plays the pitches but not the durations and tempos, which are the whole point of Stockhausen's illustration.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks again, Hyacinth. The latest changes to the example address the problems with the proportions admirably. I especially like the brackets over and under the pairs of numbers showing the proportions, which are actually an improvement in clarity over Stockhausen's own diagram.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 23:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Statement on your userpage

Your userpage states: "I currently do not have reasonable access to computers."

Yet, you seem quite active. More active than I am at least. Is the above statement outdated?

I'm sorry to read about those seizures you have. I once knew a lady who had Unverricht–Lundborg disease. She died young. It was pretty sad. I hope your prognosis is better than hers was? In any case, best of luck! – theFace 18:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Rhythm changes

snob — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.55.60.111 (talk) 02:26, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Credit you for the graphic in new article on Ralph Patt, DYK

Hi Hyacinth! FYI, I credited you with the great graphic in the following DYK nomination. I may not be able to monitor your talk page, so please correct the credit to you if you don't want it.

Thanks again! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK Nomination: Ralph Patt

Did you know

• ... that the music of Ornette Coleman, John Coltrane, and Arnold Schoenberg inspired jazz guitarist Ralph Patt to invent major-thirds tuning (illustrated)?

• Reviewed: Mayer Zald (was a mensch. RIP)

Created/expanded by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) with graphic by Hyacinth (talk). Self nom at 23:27, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Improvement

Template:Improvement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 02:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Hyacinth. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 02:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Gay Wikipedians

Category:Gay Wikipedians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. T. Canens (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Guitar chord

Hej Hyacinth!

Thanks for your help. It will take some time to revise the article. I did remove the M3 mentions from the standard tuning section, after you flagged that as disorganized.

Responding to your comments (about just redirecting readers to articles on chord theory), I shortened and focused the discussion of major, minor, and seventh chords. I added a brief discussion of three-chord progressions.

I sketched further developments for the future on the article talk page.

Thanks again for your help! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks again for your help. I finished the sketch of the introductory section on chords and chord progressions, which aims to

1. Provide a vocabulary for the rest of the article
2. Describe and "explain" why the CAGED chords are conventionally important
3. Explain particularities of guitar chords.

If the structure meets with your approval, then I should next deal with stylistic issues, such as duplicate linking. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 12:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

I've further revised the article. Maybe you could remove the template, if the revision has dealt with the disorganization previously noted. Please add new suggestions if you like! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 23:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Repetitive tuning

I wrote a stub, which displays your graphics again. I'd thought that WP:IAR would allow a bit of WP:Synthesis, but a DYK reviewer flagged my introductory paragraph justly as apparent OR, so it's been removed.

Too bad musical theorists want to talk about Schoenberg and semiotics rather than joining Sethares and writing nicely organized guides to alternative tunings! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 23:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Is there some kind of "conservation law" for your templates on my articles in progress?!?? ;p

Seriously, the neologism template seems to be designed especially for commercially motivated neologisms, and it seems to be used (when used sensibly) for commercial or academically promotional neologisms. Do you want to have the title changed to "guitar tunings that repeat (open-string) notes", which would be closer to the sources?

Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:45, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Clarification

Would you discuss what you want on the talk page of the article, please? Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:16, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strophic form, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erie Canal (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Verdehr 000.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Verdehr 000.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

"Set theory" template

Hi Hyacinth,

I notice you've been adding a new template to a lot of elementary set theory articles. I have some concerns about this. First, this sort of template has been discussed more than once at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics, and generally has not garnered a lot of support. As to the content, if there were to be a template, I am concerned that your template gives a problematic view of what set theory is, by leaving out most contemporary areas of research. --Trovatore (talk) 08:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

If you wouldn't mind dropping by Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics and explaining what you have in mind, I think that would be useful. --Trovatore (talk) 08:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

From the huge size of Category:Set theory and its subcategories, you should be able to see that this is much too large a topic to be covered by a simple template. JRSpriggs (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

The template is intended for non-researchers. There should be no problem with one template having the basics of set theory, as taught in a course in discrete mathematics for computer scientists, and perhaps including topics in Halmos's book.

A template for researchers is not intended. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:38, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

References at geosyncline

Seems I've basically "undone" an edit of yours at geosyncline. The two uncited references were used in writing and/or updating the article back in 05 or 06, prior to the development of the ref tag system. Thus they "support" portions of the article text and are references not "further reading". Yes, I could go back and add citations for what they support --- but not now. Perhaps there is some discussion of this somewhere, regarding how to "properly" update old reference styles or whatever. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 13:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Auto-Tune

Why did you revert my change without any explanation? I was trying to satisfy a comment from the article feedback. Why does it have to have that filthy quote instead of a paraphrased alternative? The link to the original was still there. BollyJeff | talk 00:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walkdown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Personal attack...

Actually, I was contemplating removing that comment and my response. I can't see any benefit it. What to u think? --Merbabu (talk) 04:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

New Frank Zappa wikipedia article

There's a new proposed Zappa project and you have been a large contributor on his articles. If you'd like to join, click here. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 23:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of found art for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of found art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of found art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Found object, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Object (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:GL/I resolved

Please check your requests Wikipedia:GL/I#Trim_music_accidentals and Wikipedia:GL/I#Blank_when_thumbnailed.2Fsized. When the result is acceptable to you, the requestor, I suggest you add {{resolved}}. That closes the job nicely. -DePiep (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Diminution

Why don't you like the conventional way of presenting references in the Diminution article? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of kite festivals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sanur

Stereoscope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lens

Time-point (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Paul Griffiths

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

language for

Why are you modifying the language templates to hard-code the word for in them? In many, if not most, uses for these templates that results in incorrect and ungrammatical usage. older ≠ wiser 02:02, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Hyacinth. You have new messages at Bkonrad's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"One Morning in May"

Hi Hyacinth. I added the example of One Morning in May to the Mixolydian Mode article. Thank you for creating a page for that song and for your other constructive edits related to that. Upon tracking down the old Irish "As I Was Walking One Morning in May" (number 663 in http://imslp.org/wiki/File:SIBLEY1802.6228.15975.cc49-39087012503696pp1-126.pdf), I find that it can hardly be the same as the Keith/Rooney/Taylor song of a similar name, even though they are both in 3/4 time and are both in C Mixolydian. I think it best to create a page "As I Was Walking One Morning in May" or similar. Do you have any ideas about what should be the exact name? Thanks.CountMacula (talk) 20:27, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your analysis of the two versions. My understanding is less than yours. Then just one page for both. And can we say that both are in C Mixolydian? The air has a virtual F key signature except for one B natural and one F#. The melody in JT's version hits every note in F and none other as far as I detected. They both come to rest on C.CountMacula (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Can we try to clear up the objection you had relative to your 03:59, 10 October 2012‎ edit of Mixolydian Mode failed-verification|date=October 2012? I didn't know exactly what it was that failed in your view. I supposed that it was the authorship of the song--because the James Taylor youtube video I cited did not mention that. So I moved the footnote to merely point to the video, hoping that that would fix it. However another user has removed all mention of the Keith/Rooney/Taylor version and left a hostile comment. I am on my way to adding a reference to the IMSLP copy of the air. Hopefully you agree that the example (in both versions) adds to the article, and you can explain to me whatever objections you may still have.CountMacula (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Septuplet rhythm

Balong-badong-dadong-dolong-dorong-gong! clicky Howdy, can you please try to remake your midi file by using two different instruments, e. g. drums and piano? All I can hear is a chaos of notes, and it's hella difficult to make out some distinct rhythm in there, because it's near-impossible to figure out who does the straight fourths and who the septuplets. Thank you. -andy 217.50.57.46 (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Acoustics

I was going to merge these but I figured you would know best how to do so (see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell#To merge). Frietjes (talk) 20:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Noise

Hello Hyacinth, on the matter of identity, take a look here, note the statement "Then I started to write the Wikipedia page on the history of noise music." I've commented further on the talk page. How should we deal with this? Semitransgenic _talk. 06:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

See Template:Connected contributor. Hyacinth (talk) 07:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

We need a "made man" template. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:12, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm familiar with that template, I'll add it. What about the CC-BY-SA 3.0 infringement? Semitransgenic _talk. 09:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

It looks like all the information on Wikipedia is about dealing with Wikipedia violating the copyright of others, not others violating the copyright of Wikipedia. Hyacinth (talk) 17:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) WP:COPYRIGHT has details about both directions of copying. The "Re-use of text" section is the first of a series on that page talking about other sites' use of content originally posted to (and then copied from) WP. As I understand it (and your (plural) concern), it's up to individuals to notice and handle it independently with the other site that is infringing (all we can do on WP is get support and assistance with doing that, etc.). DMacks (talk) 18:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

I did look through the relevant material on this yesterday, the mirrors and forks board appears to be the only place to post notices regarding infringement, but it seems to deal solely with website content. The other aspect of this is that although the book in question can be purchased, a free digital edition is available and it uses a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. However in the list of additional licenses applicable to content used in the book it does not include mention of the content taken from Wikipedia. As far as I'm aware, and from what I've seen elsewhere, when reusing content externally note of Wikipedia and the contributing editors (to the article in question) should be included. Semitransgenic _talk. 10:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I and others have applied Dr. Nechvatal's research notes and eventual published writings to the Wikipedia Noise Music page. In that sense he did supply most of the historical data that makes up the Noise Music page and so he made that claim loosely in an interview. Indirectly he did develop it to a large extent. Regardless, I don't see how all the historical material donated to Wikipedia serves anyone poorly or favorably. I have been objective in my development of the page based on research I have obtained and verified. If anything, others have been promoted through the research material Dr. Nechvatal gave me as he developed his book over the years. That is a fact for which Wikipedia should be grateful I would think. BTW, Dr. Nechvatal's book is a free e-book on which he makes no profit. Valueyou (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Also on Amazon for $23. To spare Hyacinth's talk page please see further discussion here. Semitransgenic _talk. 15:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Of which he received $0 by contract. Perhaps it is important for Hyacinth to know that you have been aggressive and wrong in prior accusations towards me. Valueyou (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Dear Hyacinth. On the Noise Music issue at the talk page of Semitransgenic, I feel responsible here for the confusion, as I added quite a bit of research material based on the formation of the book in close to real time during its development. But there are references to the book on the Noise Music page (the book appeared in mid 2011). My understanding is that the Wikimedia Foundation does not own copyright on Wikipedia article texts and illustrations. And that one of the most important aspects of Wikipedia is that its text may be freely redistributed, reused and built upon by anyone, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and, except where otherwise noted, the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Permission to reproduce and modify text on Wikipedia has already been granted to anyone anywhere by the authors of individual articles as long as such reproduction and modification complies with licensing terms. As Dr. Nechvatal greatly assisted me by providing his research into the subject for his non-profit book, he was not hesitant to use some of the material (publications that include some content from a wiki project are not considered as republished) that appears in some modified form in his Creative Commons license free e-book and not-for-profit print on demand paper book for which he receives $0.00.

On page 5 of the Immersion Into Noise book it states that: “Under this license, authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy this book so long as the authors and source are cited and resulting derivative works are licensed under the same or similar license. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher. Statutory fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above.”

So I ask that this issue be closed.Valueyou (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Bolding/Debolding 'second'

I didn't notice in the history of Major second that you had previously debolded 'second'. But I think it should be bolded or receive whatever other emphasis is standard for a term that is being defined. It is being defined there, and that is my reason for bolding it. Other terms defined and bolded in the article are: 'major tone', 'greater tone', 'minor tone', and 'lesser tone'. So how is the definition of 'second' different from the other definitions, and why should the others be bolded and 'second' not be bolded?CountMacula (talk) 20:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

You did not respond to the question of why all those other terms defined in the article are bolded and 'second' is not. Are you familiar with the convention that in any definiton, the defined term is given some kind of typographical emphasis?CountMacula (talk) 22:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Any term should be bolded at the location of its definition, but not thereafter.CountMacula (talk) 22:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

See the use of typographical emphasis of the defined terms 'definiendum' and 'definiens' in Definition, as practiced by whoever wrote the article---people who ought to know. They did not use bolding. I didn't intend to insist on bolding---only on some kind of emphasis of the defined terms at the points of definition. Are you seeing the essence of that?CountMacula (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Also, since 'major second' is defined in terms of 'second', its definition should come after that of 'second'. Or would that not be a logical and standard way of doing it?

BTW I may have some formatting errors involving song titles in One Morning in May (folk song). I would appreciate your help there if you know how those are supposed to be handled. Thanks.CountMacula (talk) 20:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

You wrote:

The term defined in the article "definition" is bolded. The article reads: "A definition is..." Similarly, the term defined in the article "major second" is bolded. That article reads: "...a major second is..."

The term 'definition' in that article is bolded because it is the the subject of the article, not because it is defined there, although it is defined there. Were it not the subject of the article, it would get emphasis other than bolding---because it is defined in the article. The other terms I mentioned above get emphasis at their points of definition. They are not bolded because they are not the subject of the article.CountMacula (talk) 22:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

You wrote:

Why aren't "'stipulative' definition" and "'descriptive' definition" italicized? Hyacinth (talk) 23:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, well, it does seem that the Definition article is not consistent in its method of emphasis of the many terms that it defines. There may be some pattern that we are not seeing. But a quick review of the article shows probably more than a score of terms defined and that all or just about all of them get some kind of emphasis. I guess we need to look into the details of the convention that Wikipedia promotes if any. Would you object to me for now changing the emphasis of the terms (including 'second') defined in the article to italics---except for the defined term that appears in the title of the article, of course?CountMacula (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

What would be the essence of your objection? I thought you might consider it an improvement to change the bolding of several defined terms to something not so loud. And I note that you have yet to state the distinction between those several terms and 'second' by which the former are bolded and the latter is not.CountMacula (talk) 02:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Composer templates

Would it be possible to have a category with all composer templates in one alphabetical list? It might be called Category:Composer templates by composer surname. Then one could look by composer name and find the templates for one composer grouped together. Or is the search function sufficient for this? --Robert.Allen (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm always reluctant to work on categories (except at Commons, where I think they are essential), since I have a very poor idea of how they are supposed to work at Wikipedia. And when there are lots of pages, it can really be a lot of work to change things. I give you a lot of credit for tackling this one!

BTW, thanks for the link with help for searching categories. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to help all that much. First of all, for template pages one has to search using the Help page search box. Second, it apparently cannot be limited with a second search term. For example, compare the following searches: #1 with the regular search box; #2 with the Help page search box, Template namespace selected; #3 the same with another search term; #4 a simple search in the regular search box.

1. incategory:"Composer templates"
2. incategory:"Composer templates"
3. Tchaikovsky incategory:"Composer templates"
4. Template: Tchaikovsky

I'm not sure what to think about all this... :-) --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, that really helps. I see now why #1 did not work, but I don't understand why #2 worked. (Unless as you say, there is a lag and all the hits were previously in that category. Actually I'm getting a lot fewer hits with the second search now, so this seems very likely.) By "Help page search" I just meant using the Wikipedia Help page search box here. Not sure how much this really differs from the regular search box. --Robert.Allen (talk) 07:44, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amusia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Categories

Since you recategorized Template:Franz Lehár‎, Template:Jacques Offenbach and Template:John Philip Sousa‎, I thought you might look at the other composer template I have created: Template:Mary Rodgers.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

A brief thank you...

As a xenharmonic musician, I would never have dreamed that the mainstream Wikipedia would ever have information on the odd type of music I and a few colleagues were into, and yet there are now multiple pages on the topic! Most impressive, and this is true of what I find on Wikimedia Commons as well, is that there are many MIDI sound files of non-12-equal tunings, most if not all done by yourself. I cannot tell you how much that helps me to see what is possible and inspires me to help in my small way. I am a member of the "Xenharmonic Wiki", an independent site dedicated to more detailed information about non-12-tone music and theory and am trying to get started with MIDI, so seeing that you have already made history as being the most prolific creator of microtonal MIDI examples gives me a wave of hope. I am trying to use RoseGarden currently, to go along with the Free Culture principles here, but have not been able to quickly and easily get it to work so will be trying other options. I currently use Csound as my main composing tool but am always trying to learn something new. Oddly enough it seems to be harder to make the smaller files. MIDI has long baffled and intrigued me with its promise of miniscule size and yet killer depth to understand. You are at least a few steps ahead of me so thank you for paving the way so nicely. Senobyte (talk) 21:09, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Senobyte

WP:ANI

Your reversion of my edits using rollback is improper. See you at ANI. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 07:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

While i can't be your representative, I can make a suggestion: You have a right to remain silent, please use it! With three commenters (thumperward, KW and myself) indicating it's a bogus ANI, it's highly likely the thread will either be close no action or archived by the bot cause no one cares. If an editor who hasn't commented asks you a specific question, then I'd answer. Otherwise, letting it blow over is the best choice. Nobody Ent 11:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes the thread should not have been started, but you have been mis-using rollback. Please do not use rollback for good-faith content disputes. It is for vandalism only. Regards, GiantSnowman 12:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) What Nobody Ent and GiantSnowman said. Fix it up, and just shrug it off, mate - we're all on the same side here. --Shirt58 (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whirly tube, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmonic series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Message from User:Basemetal00

Greetings User:Hyacinth. You've set up a talk page for me, for which I thank you. Where can I ask you a few around editing? The first one being: Is this the right way to leave a message on a talk page?Basemetal00 (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings again. Thanks for answering my question. I've got another one: You answered it on my talk page. Is this how one usually does it? I would have thought it more convenient to answer where the question was asked in the first place, but then I don't know how things work around here. Thanks. Signed: Basemetal00 (write to me here) 18:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Merging articles in the Music Theory WikiProject

Hi, I've raised this issue at the WikiProject talk page. Since you're one of the main contributors in this field, I'd like to hear your opinion and suggestions. Cheers!--Fauban 12:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Scientific pitch notation merge

Why have you done this? When one is reverted it is normal to start a discussion if there is still disagreement. It is certainly not normal just to revert back without explanation. I did not even get an edit summary.

The article you are merging into scientific pitch notation has very little to say on notation. It is almost entirely about the ranges of humans and instruments and their ability to play the first octave. This is an inappropriate place to merge. Range (music) would make a better target, but you have yet to explain why it is necessary to merge at all. SpinningSpark 13:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

First octave now redirects to Octave. How's that? Hyacinth (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Well that's a better target, but there has still been no reasoning for the merge. In my opinion, merges should nearly always be preceded by discussion, or at least notification, except for very obvious cases. I would draw your attention to the Template:Merge family. SpinningSpark 11:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

There has been no reasoning not to merge. Do you plan to greatly expand "First octave"? Hyacinth (talk) 23:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

No. SpinningSpark 23:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Most/all of the reasons at Wikipedia:Merging#Reasons_for_merger seem to apply, especially #3, text. Hyacinth (talk) 23:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Octave, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages C2 and C1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Louis Vierne

Hello Hyacinth, I was wondering if you could help me with the licensing of this photo (File:Vierne Photo.jpg) I uploaded in the Commons. I found it on IMSLP so I gather it must be free of copyright, but I still can't find my way through the technical procedure regarding its proper validation. The Louis Vierne article looks a bit empty without the composer's pic, so if you could help me that would be great.

Also, while I'm on your talk page, have a look at Organ of the Basilica of St. Martin (Weingarten) if you may; I've tried to amend it by adding photos and having the stops' disposition appear in the same way as the German article. I'm quite sure it needs more work, but still, any comments and hints will be much appreciated.

Thanks again, all the best! --Chrysalifourfour (talk) 09:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response, I'm not really sure if I'm supposed to do anything further with the Vierne photo, I should have asked someone else to do it in the first place!

As for the Weingarten article, I believe the huge gap you see depends on the font size you use. I'm not quite sure whether there's a standard positioning of photos so that it always looks neat; it looks okay on my screen though. --Chrysalifourfour (talk) 11:02, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Chord (music)

At here, in a table, I changed "nine" to "ninth" in "Seventh flat nine" and "Seventh sharp nine" for consistency with the prose above the table, as well as all the other chords mentioned, all of which use the ordinal form of the numbers (e.g. "Seventh augmented eleventh" and "Seventh augmented fifth"). You then reverted one of the two edits (but not the other). Can you explain (why, in this one case, "nine" would be correct)? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 06:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Multiple image

I gather, from your edits to Template:Multiple image/doc, that you are having difficulties with {{Multiple image}}. There is a known problem with horizontal placement, but it is not as implied by your text:

the template with "direction = horizontal" will place both images on different lines (rows), creating a blank space

It's been discussed at Template talk:Multiple image#Zoom breaks Horizontal layout (and other threads on the same page), and the general opinion is that it only affects certain browsers, and then only at certain zoom levels.

Which browser are you using, and what is the zoom setting? --Redrose64 (talk) 13:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

The documentation should mention this "problem", whatever it is. If I remember correctly this appears to be a new problem, and thus presumably arising on one of the templates this template calls up (since this template hasn't been edited for a few months).

It sounds like your saying both that what I described doesn't happen, and then acknowledging that it does happen. I assume then all that would need to be added to the statement you quote is "On some [X, Y, and Z] browsers...".

I use Firefox, but I don't see how that is relevant, unless you can use this information to help solve the "problem".

I'd never heard of "zoom setting" until you mentioned it. I didn't find anything that would allow one to describe the zoom setting (aside from the vague: more/less). I don't use any/I use the standard.

If this wasn't a problem before, or will be fixed, why does Template:Double image exist?

Hyacinth (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

With horizontal placement, {{multiple image}} uses only one subtemplate: {{Multiple image/numImgs}}, which hasn't been altered since it was created in September 2010.

The browser is certainly relevant, since at least one (Opera) does not exhibit this problem at any zoom level. It is known that no two browsers behave identically, since although the software writers are recommended to abide by the W3C standards, they are under no obligation to follow them exactly. When we create web pages, we have two main choices: do we code to suit the quirks of one of the popular browsers and so exclude people who use one of the others; or do we code to meet the published standards in the expectation that the writers of browsers will do the same? A good example of such variation concerns the CSS basic box model, which defines how the padding, border and margins around box-type objects (such as images) should be specified and interpreted. If a browser interprets these measurements differently (as indeed several do), we find that text or images is not displayed as we might expect.

The zoom setting in Firefox is found in the menu bar as View → Zoom, and when there is no zoom (View → Zoom → Reset, alternatively following Ctrl+0), {{Multiple image}} with |direction=horizontal displays correctly in all five major browsers (Chrome, Firefox, IE, Opera, Safari).

{{Double image}} is older: it dates from April 2006, whilst {{Multiple image}} was created in April 2008. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Valueyou

in light of the following [1][2][3]. You seem to think something is amiss, I tend to agree, but what is the best way to approach this in future? Would asking the user to declare an interest, or to think maybe about wp:cleanstart help? Or is it best just ignore it and AGF? Semitransgenic _talk. 19:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Moving proportions to naturals in pythagorean table on pentatonic scale.

You undid my revision, which iz in keeping with other tables on wikipedia. "Proportion" and "Natural" are interchangeable in this context. The numbers I will move are reciprocals of terms in the harmonic series (mathematics). Reciprocals of terms in the HS are naturals. I can use them directly in a synthesizer by multiplying them all by the same fundamental frequency -- into range of hearing. They are not spaced evenly. They are not real numbers or whole numbers. They are naturals. Ratios and proportions are composed of two or more natural numbers. My synthesizer interprets zero az a rest, BTW, which means that I use whole numbers. My practice iz theory. 75.152.125.31 (talk) 11:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ostinato, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sooner or Later, Loose Change and Now's the Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Subdominant

Please go to Talk:Degree (music) for info on how the subdominant was named. Georgia guy (talk) 01:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Interval (music) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Time point

Wooden horse (device) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Freeman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Historicize

Template:Historicize has been nominated for merging with Template:Historical information needed. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 11:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback: WP:NOUSERS

Hello, Hyacinth. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia should not have users.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Autostereogram Featured article review

I have nominated Autostereogram for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:53, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Notation error on Eimert's mirror?

I think the final note in the middle voice should be a G-flat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Multiplication_as_mirror_operation.png Would you be able to comment/correct? Thanks much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin.downs (talk • contribs) 13:24, 11 December 2012

0  = C
1  = C#/Db
2  = D
3  = D#/Eb
4  = E
5  = F
6  = F#/Gb
7  = G
8  = G#/Ab
9  = A
10 = A#/Bb
11 = B

0  × 5 = 0,  0  × 7 = 0
1  × 5 = 5,  1  × 7 = 7
...
11 × 5 = 55, 11 × 7 = 77

55 - (12 × 4) = 7 = G
77 - (12 × 6) = 5 = F

Just as 1 (identity), when multiplied by 5 and 7 produces 5 and 7, 11 (-1) (inversion) produces 7 and 5. Hyacinth (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Aha! Thanks. All is well with your (and Eimert's and Schuijer's) notation then. Very nice work by the way. Benjamin.downs (talk) 01:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Dear Hyacinth,

My first article has “passed” the committee and was given the rank of “C”. My question is this: though the work is now made a formal Wikipedia “article” or “entry,” I notice that it cannot be located by typing the title, (“Sylvan (Sholom) Kalib”) into the general Wikipedia search field. Can you advise me how to correct this? Additionally, I would like for the article to be located when folks search simply for ”Sylvan Kalib,” too. All best wishes. Many Thanks, Pdsayre (talk)Paul —Preceding undated comment added 12:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

See: Wikipedia:Redirect and Wikipedia:Moving a page.

If you have an article titled "X", but you want readers to end up at "X" when they search for "Y", you go to "Y" and create a redirect to "X" (#REDIRECT [[X]]).

If you have an article titled "Y" but you want it to be at "X", click "Move page".

However, it looks like "Sylvan (Sholom) Kalib" was already moved to "Sylvan Kalib", and a redirect was created from "Sylvan (Sholom) Kalib" to "Sylvan Kalib". Thus when one searches for either, one ends up at "Sylvan Kalib". Hyacinth (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Hyacinth,

Thank you. I appreciate the advice.

-)

Pdsayre (talk) 22:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)paul

Schoenberg circle

Our beautiful search engine doesn't even show the article on Schoenberg circle (as of today), so I failed and is seeking your help to find the the correct target that you might have intended. Thanks for your help···Vanischenu^「m/_Talk」 11:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks···Vanischenu^「m/_Talk」 11:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Going Microtonal with Copyleft Software

I self-discovered that Rosegarden can edit precise pitch bend events as per the MIDI standard. By editing a track in the "Event List Editor", one can insert events of many types, including pitch bend events. It uses the MSB/LSB convention, where the least significant byte increments by 1 and the most significant byte increments 128 units (of 16,384 total, of course, pitch bend being the only 14-bit aspect of MIDI) or about 3 cents as you mentioned. I now believe there is no reason for me to investigate Sibelius as all of your standard MIDI files are perfectly editable and study-able in Rosegarden. In the summer, I had a cursory and superficial contact with Rosegarden that gave me the wrong impression. I could only get sloppy pitch bends by dragging in a graphical editor which was not all the program was capable of. As I am interested in programming cell phone games (Java ME to be precise) MIDI is a big part of the game music on low-end devices and I am happy to say that most phones play pitch-bent MIDI files well. I have one phone that plays the original pitch for too long before bending which makes for a disorienting effect, but I find most phones play the files right. You have been a pioneer in bringing non-12TET sounds to Wikipedia and I look forward to joining you in appropriate microtonal/xenharmonic contributions. If your computer ever breaks, I have one or two decent spare laptops I would be glad to help you out with. Happy Hacking and Happy Holidays too. Senobyte (talk) 01:14, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

COI

Thank you Hyacinth for the suggestion of declaration of interest. Yes perhaps that is an answer. I was not aware of it. Anyway, all the information on the Joseph Nechvatal page is objective and verified. Most recent verification can be found on page 199 of the book 100 Ideas that Changed Art by Michael Bird, published by LAURENCE KING PUBLISHING LIMITED, London 2012 - where his painting Orgiastic abattOir : flawless ignudiO (2003) - published with his permission on wikipedia - is presented and discussed around his ideas of the "viractual" (p. 198). The issue of notes does not apply to this page. I would appreciate it if you would remove the COI banner. If it is best, I will not contribute to this page any more. Valueyou (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Again I ask you if you would please remove the COI banner at Joseph Nechvatal. I will be happy to make a wp:cleanstart - and I will not contribute to this page any more. OK? Thank you. Valueyou (talk) 13:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Debussy chords for Guiraud (notation)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Debussy%27s_chords_for_Guiraud.png

Thanks for this. In studying it, I'm finding the accidental notation a bit ambiguous. In the first bar, you (or your reference) add another flat on the B in the 5th chord, already flattened from the 3rd chord; but you don't add another sharp on the 6th chord, though there is a sharp on the previous F. Am I to take it from this that the B in the 5th chord is bbB - ie. A or that it's there in error? If this score weren't atonal, it might be clearer to me, but as I found it whilst browsing atonality, I'm left wondering. A similar ambiguity exists in the 4th bar.

I was actually thinking of adding a midi file to illustrate the example when I encountered this - it takes me too long to play the changes "live" to hear what he's getting at at some points in the sequences. Trev M  ~  16:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

DYK

See also: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know § Clarification_needed?

First, and I can't believe this needs to be said, do not put a maintaintence template in DYK or anywhere on the main page, for that matter. Second, there is nothing wrong with the hook. Power is the rate at which energy is transferred by the circuit. "2000 MW per hour" is nonsensical. T. Canens (talk) 07:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Maybe this is why people leave Wikipedia: commands without reason. Hyacinth (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm not qualified to evaluate the hook, but the Main Page is NOT the time to put maintenance templates on a hook. If you hate it, then say so at the DYK reviewing stage which typically lasts for a few days. DYKs only get pulled off the Main Page because of plagiarism. --Rschen7754 07:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

It's ridiculous what you did, Hyacinth. There is a specific page to post errors reports for items appearing on the Main Page: Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors. Yazan (talk) 08:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Where else was this incident discussed? Hyacinth (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Well, Template:Did you know is watched by many people as it's on the Main Page... --Rschen7754 06:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

But my talk page isn't. Hyacinth (talk) 06:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

here. Yazan (talk) 06:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Invitation and RSVP

<font=3>WIKIPEDIA LOVES LIBRARIES: MISSOULA PUBLIC LIBRARY WIKIPEDIA WORKSHOP! You're invited to participate in Wikipedia Loves Libraries 2013, a workshop and edit-athon hosted by Missoula Public Library for the purpose of improving National Register of Historic Places listings in Montana and stubs relating to Montana. No prior experience needed! The event will take place on Friday, January 4, 2013 from 3:30-5:30pm at the Missoula Public Library Main Branch in Missoula, Montana. You can view details about this Wiki Loves Libraries event here. Be sure to RSVP and share the results of your work HERE.

(Note change in start time to 3:30PM)Djembayz (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting that typo! Djembayz (talk) 20:09, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harmonization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sonority (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:Req photo

Hi, could you please stop creating the redirect Req photo. There really is no need for yet another alias. People spent some time cleaning up all the different templates for requesting photographs, would be a shame to undo all that work. There are enough alias for {{Image requested}}, for example {{reqphoto}}. --Traveler100 (talk) 11:57, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siren disk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Regular tunings!

The thicker lines are more legible (yeah!), and the directed arrows more informative (YEAH!!!).

Happy New Year, Hyacinth!

The png files are much more legible. Thanks for the great work.

Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 01:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

"C-G-D-A-E-G". Hyacinth (talk) 11:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Maybe it was the old diagram, or I edited past my bedtime. I corrected the query about E-G. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)