User talk:IAmAnEditor8

Disambiguation link notification for January 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamza Shinwari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modern literature. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaifi Khalil (January 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kaifi Khalil instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaifi Khalil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IAmAnEditor8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Saraiki language, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Radical reversion on Sindhis article[edit]

Hello user, It is to inform you that you're recent contributions on Sindhis article were reverted as it was unexplained, radical and was done in a non-constructive manner, incase refer to the talkpage of article if you want to propose/make justification for changes to the article.
It seems that in past you've made some unpopular contributions, incase please take some time to familiarise yourself with WikiPedia's editor policies, if you want to know how to contribute to WikiPedia properly then check Good contributiong to WikiPedia, feel free to talk to me at my page.
Thanks.
- TheBushSush (talk) 09:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your WP:POVPUSH and WP:OR disruption and arbitrary replacement of phrases and content is against WP:CONSENSUS. You have already been served prior notices for this before, please detest lest your editing privileges be restricted and blocked. Gotitbro (talk) 12:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:PakistanHistorian per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PakistanHistorian. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]