User talk:I am Agent X

Welcome!

Hello, I am Agent X, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! lTopGunl (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAK

Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining the Pakistan WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) lTopGunl (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! Glad to join the Pakistani project. --I am Agent X 12:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jinnah

This is quite serious. You have removed sourced information, and in doing so have explicitly supported another editor who 1) abandoned discussion, 2) has not bothered to look at the source, and 3) made unjustifiable "requrests" of other editors. Please explain. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is mention of alcohol important? He asks for context. Nobody provided it. --I am Agent X 16:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And you think the appropriate action is to not respond for 3 days, to not look at the source, and then to remove the material only because other editors have not done work for you? I don't consider that appropriate actions for an editor. Furthermore, both you and that editor have knowingly and consciously removed sourced material from an article without responding and without explanation on the talk page. Explain yourself. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I explained edit in summary. I have done it on talk page now. --I am Agent X 17:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can you state as a conclusion in your edit summary that it's "unimportant no context like Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington said"? If you don't know why it was significant (despite that being said in the discussion that ended 3 days ago), then the appropriate editorial decision is to look at the source and ask if you don't know, and not to remove sourced information out of ignorance. Again, if the issue was "context" (what the other "editor" said before removing the same sourced information), then the appropriate editorial response is to get the source, read it, and then either provide context or propose and discuss its removal. Gimmetoo (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please support your source there. I will watch that page. --I am Agent X 12:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attack page

Hello bro your name is on attack page list which blame you calling you sock. I have inform admin about it. you can comment too Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Darkness Shines/diffs --Highstakes00 (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying man! Ridiculous. --I am Agent X 11:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I am Agent X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey! This is the only account I have ever used. Why the heck block me? I log in after days and I find myself blocked! I have crosschecked investigation pages, I never violated and the result was that I am unrelated to him. Now why am I blocked still? I only use a webhost because my network is monitored and blogs, facebook and editing wikis and stuff is banned in my office network. I can read but I can not access other wise. I have not misused a webhost. Using a webhost is not a violation I know that much about Wikipedia. If you have problem with the host you can ban that host. I'll use it from my home or by some other method but you do not need to block my ID guys have some faith I did not mis use my account too check my contributions around. Tell me if there is anything else I need to explain? --I am Agent X 16:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Having seen further evidence, I am confident that you have not been totally straightforward about your editing. It seems certain that this account is not your first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I am Agent X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know every one who uses this webhost so I can not tell about others but you have blocked this host so it is resolved ain't it? You did not show me? what evidence? If I can put some code in my signature can not mean it is not my first account you know people who are not on Wikipedia have brains too. I have told you I do not have another account. I some times used to edit without account before so I know about things here. You did not link any account to me or give any evidence so I have put another unblock request. If you see my contributions I have done nothing disruptive that can accuse me of using a new account to hide something. My hands are clean. I only edited Indian history till now. Delta Quad said my edits were just coincidence and both TopGun and Darkness Shines accused me that I was sock of other but I am not related to both of them or any one else. If I am unblocked I can prove from my editing that I am here to improve Wikipedia. --I am Agent X 13:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's patently obvious from your editing history that this isn't your first account. Don't play us for fools. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/I am Agent X for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]