User talk:Iamobjective

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamobjective (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request to be unblocked as my account use was brought on by privacy concerns. If possible, I can discuss privately via email

Decline reason:

User has agreed via e-mail to discontinue use of this account and will be editing as User:Beobjectiveplease. Diannaa ^(Talk) 02:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block / Ban[edit]

Tiptoety, I have sent you an email regarding this. Possible to discuss privately with HelloAnyong?

I'd request this be public. (Babasilichai) 03:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Babasalichai, your request is completely out of order. I have no knowledge of the matter(s) at issue, but I have confidence that the admins involved are competent to deal with it (them). And it looks as if you have a personal axe to grind, which I suggest you walk away from. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Babasilichai, my apologies. In short-cutting I accidentally mutilated your sig. It was not intentional. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Opera Solutions Logo 2010.PNG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Opera Solutions Logo 2010.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ElectrifAi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ElectrifAi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ElectrifAi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]