User talk:Idrees Pazhwak

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mawlana Ataullah Faizani (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mawlana Ataullah Faizani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mawlana Ataullah Faizani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Idrees Pazhwak! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pashto, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Referencing problems: Please learn to reference properly. I suggest practicing in your own Sandbox (an option at the top right menu bar). Once you have a correct format there you can copy it into articles. David notMD (talk) 09:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Idrees Pazhwak! You created a thread called Sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kunar River—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheImaCow (talk) 09:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I have the reliable sources for my edit on Kunar river. You must have a better reason to revert it. Idrees Pazhwak (talk) 10:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your removals of "unauthorized changes" are unacceptable as no one has to authorize them

You need a better reason in edit summaries to remove them. If they are sourced, you need to explain why you think they should be removed. Doug Weller talk 09:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the helping. I will try my best to make better exit summaries. Idrees Pazhwak (talk) 10:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Why are you claiming that the Hazara have a short history?

At Behsud (Hazara tribe) you wrote "As the Hazara don't have a long history, so history of Behsud tribe starts from 19th century where the 19th century Behsutd chieftain Mir Yazdan Bakhsh was one of the first Hazara chiefs, who tried in vain to unify all Hazaras". But Hazaras says "The Hazara identity in Afghanistan is believed by many to have originated in the aftermath of the 1221 Siege of Bamyan. The first mention of Hazara are made by Babur in the early 16th century and later by the court historians of Shah Abbas of the Safavid dynasty." That makes no sense. Doug Weller talk 10:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

The name Hazarajat was first used by Babur shah in the book (Babur nama) which doesn't mention the Hazara word. The word Hazara was first used in london times magazine in 1893. Thanks for your informing I am trying to develop Asian articles in Wikipedia. Idrees Pazhwak (talk) 10:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Please, never change quotations

as you did at Parwan Province. Doug Weller talk 10:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm Contributor321. Your recent edit(s) to the page Colombia appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Peru. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Vatican City, you may be blocked from editing. Contributor321 (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mawlana Ataullah Faizani

Hello, Idrees Pazhwak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mawlana Ataullah Faizani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)