User talk:Iforgetsorry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Iforgetsorry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Inkstains, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 03:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance Waters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Inkstains[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Inkstains, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inkstains. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sherool (talk) 23:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didn't contest that it was a real product. However I feel there is not much in the way of notability or verifiable information other than the mere fact that it's near completion. It may very well become notable once it's been released depending on it's reception, but as things stand I feel having an article about this album seems a bit preemptive. --Sherool (talk) 21:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ozhiphop.com listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ozhiphop.com. Since you had some involvement with the Ozhiphop.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Duffbeerforme (talk) 07:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Phatchance[edit]

The article Phatchance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no real notability shown. only independent reliable source that mentions Phatchance has trivial coverage. nothing satisfies wp:music

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Phatchance, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phatchance. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]