Jump to content

User talk:Imagixx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alphabetized names.

[edit]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://dd214express.com/catalog/faq.php. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Veteran Health Identification Card. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Reason: repeated addition of promotional prose with external links to a scam targeting US veterans, along with edit-warring to keep the material posted. →‎ GS →‎ 09:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

red-outlined triangle containing exclamation point Warning Do not add promotional material to Wikipedia as you did at RMS Republic. The material added is clearly intended to promote speculative business ventures based on unproven claims. The sources cited do not pass Wikipedia's guidelines for reliability and neutrality. Promotional editing is not allowed and if done persistently may result in your being blocked from editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Imagixx. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Imagixx. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Imagixx|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid directly or indirectly for the the wholly factual edits. If you'd bother to read the content and references, you'll understand that this is real history. Also, what better references can you want than the NYT and WP regarding cargo?
The cargo as stated is outdated. If you read the source material, it is an $800,000 face US Navy shipment, and a $25 million Russian State Bank shipment, all solidly referenced and sourced. If you run the calculations, that is a several billion dollar cargo.
See research at: https://lordsoffortune.com/catalog/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=8
Also, the legal ownership should be clearly identified and sourced, as I provided in my updated material. 172.97.45.5 (talk) 23:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lourdes 06:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My edits are all entirely accurate, factual and thoroughly refrenced with undisputable, reputable sources. I have been editing Wiki for pver a decade.
For example, the idebtified cargo of $3,000,000 in American Double eagle coins is 150,000 troy ounces of gold if we melt all the coins down. At the current $2,000 per troy ounce, that's $300 million. Typically, too, numisnatic value is 2X to 6X melt. The previous valuation, with supported verifiable reference, is accurate. Your choice to use "inflation" to value the cargo is without any support or reference whatsoever. We respectfully request you revert to accurate information. Imagixx (talk) 02:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Who are "we"? Lourdes 06:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don't attach the messenger, the ad hominum attack. Argue facts. Are you an expert numismatist? No. You removed an impression from an expert on gold coins, and substituted a value for "inflation." If you melt down the $3,000,000 in coins, you have 150,000 troy ounces of gold. That's $300,000,000. On average (depending on the hoard), coin value will typically average 2X to 6X gold value. We are back to the $1 billion valuation on a simple, basic, logical, factual analysis.
For another professional appraisal, visit the Executive Summary at:
https://lordsoffortune.com/reference/RMS_Republic_Executive_Summary.pdf
Simply stated, your RMS Republic article is significantly outdated.
Or pick up a copy of my well-reviewed thoroughly research book, The Tsar's Treasure.
You should get on board. The ship is about to sail and you'll miss the boat.
Capt. Martin Bayerle Imagixx (talk) 00:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]