User talk:Indiantalentnews123

This is Indiantalentnews123's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steven Harris Ramdev has been accepted[edit]

Steven Harris Ramdev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 15:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Steven Harris Ramdev, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Leonidlednev (talk) 16:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Indiantalentnews123, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Indiantalentnews123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot As mentioned before, this was done voluntarily by myself based on the research and news publications. The entity has not paid nor has any connection with respect to creating this page. There are no financial stakes involved here in creating the article. The articles meets all the standards of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Thank you. Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notablity is, well, debatable here. Maybe. What caused you to select this person to write about and not, say, another? 331dot (talk) 10:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing my research initially by searching for the terms "Indian Talent" "Indian Artist" and other terms. I found many people, but in terms of notability, I found many articles on this entity. As I have mentioned before, I have many articles on individuals' to be included on Wikipedia. It's still under process. I hope that cleared your doubts. Also, please don't keep asking many questions, as I am also busy with my work and research, editing and writing. So kindly end the conversation at the earliest. Thank you. Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 10:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:ENGAGE. 331dot (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Thank you for the information. It was really helpful. Please let me know about the minor changes that have to be made. I'll surely make them or rewrite them. We can solve this on a good positive note. Thanks. Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments[edit]

We've noticed that you've selectively removed messages from other users from your talk page. This is allowed, per WP:BLANKING (with a few exceptions). However, it is assumed that you have read and understood these messages prior to removing them. Some users may also interpret this action as deliberately ignoring their legitmate concerns, contrary to Wikipedia's policy of civility. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and sometimes you must engage in civil discussion to resolve disagreements. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Steven Harris Ramdev, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok apologies, that was by mistake as the system was crashing. I was making few minor edits. Please add back the template. The case is being resolved now. Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Steven Harris Ramdev shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steven Harris Ramdev for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Harris Ramdev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Harris Ramdev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected @Theroadislong

I kindly plead and request you for the non deletion of the page Steven Harris Ramdev. I have submitted enough evidence to backup my claims and I feel it would be encouraging at your end as well to move the article from the deletion page. Instead, we can improve the writing of the article, and leave it to other editors for contribution. I have created this article and we can definitely improve it rather than deleting it. I am very confident that the article for Mr.Steven Harris deserves to be on Wikipedia and goes well with respect to the notability guidelines. I have come across many biography articles on Wikipedia and some of them don't even have enough number of articles or it's quite vague. I will make sure the templates added by the contributors will not be removed further, instead we can discuss the same and improve the article. I totally respect their decisions. But please, this is my first article and I have tried my best to learn and improve it. I will definitely adhere to the rules and will learn more. Please encourage by not deleting this page and please do remove the deletion template. We can definitely improve the quality of writing without any biases. Looking forward to a positive response. Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 03:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not for me to decide about deletion, it is for the community to decide at the deletion discussion page. Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Steven Harris Ramdev) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Steven Harris Ramdev. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 06:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got a notification stating that I am free to remove the template by adding this below code. That's why I removed and added. It was displayed above the template.

This user page was nominated for deletion on 7 April 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 06:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 06:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then please add back the templates. Thanks. I have been so depressed by answering to all your conversations. It's affecting my mental state as well personally. I kindly request you to end this conversation by removing the templates. Thanks Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 06:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 12:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indiantalentnews123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Madan@311 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Change of Username to original name. To remove the block status on this account. Indiantalentnews123 (talk) 13:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your "original name"? This account has not had a previous name. Please explain what you mean. Cabayi (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would note that even if the username issue is resolved, a few minutes before this account was blocked a week for harrasment(of me). 331dot (talk) 15:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And also Theroadislong and AndyTheGrump. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]