User talk:Indoman365

August 2023

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kalidasa, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 08:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Georgia (U.S. state). Magnolia677 (talk) 10:35, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pune, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 09:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had just given the Respectable s of The India Their Respective Title And They were not meant for tests.

So please let them be as they were .And there was not a single thing in my Pune edits that vandalized Wikipedia on any manner Indoman365 (talk) 12:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're reading too much into this. Just because you edited an article to add "Sir" to a British person's name (which was vandalism, incidentally, since the person wasn't knighted) and it wasn't immediately reverted does not indicate bias - it's just chance. Wikipedia does not require honorary titles, whether the subject is British, Indian or whatever. See MOS:HONORIFIC. Dave.Dunford (talk) 15:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chahamanas of Shakambhari. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 11:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

In the short time you have been here, you have been blocked from editing once, and nearly every one of your edits have been reverted. Perhaps English is not a language you are comfortable with, but your grammar and tone are unencyclopic. Please consider what contributions you are able to make to English Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gandhi–Irwin Pact have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gandhi–Irwin Pact was changed by Indoman365 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857022 on 2023-08-24T15:24:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Indoman365! I noticed that you have marked 33 of your 41 edits as minor, and many of these were not. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About 40% of your edits did not have edit summaries. Clearly you know what edit summaries are, and why they are useful. Please make sure that all your edits have edit summaries.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:46, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maharana Pratap, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SKAG123 (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the on ground truth. And the editing/ contribution facility is given by wikipedia just for these things .

What was wtong in my edits Indoman365 (talk) 05:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

waiting for reply!! Indoman365 (talk) 12:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. (See Wikipedia:Verifiability.)-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also please see WP:RS, WP:WEASEL, and WP:NOR. Your edits clearly violate them SKAG123 (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]