User talk:InternetScavenger89

This is InternetScavenger89's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Userboxes

This user loves Minecraft.

This user has been on Wikipedia for 2 years, 11 months and 19 days.

This user contributes with Twinkle.

This user is a member of
the Guild of Copy Editors.

This user is a recent changes patroller.

vn

This user talk page has been vandalized.

Hi i am --InternetScavenger89 and i love wikipedia. Welcome to my talk page!

Emergency user slap button

Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (direct link)
Editors can report a malfunctioning user to the village stocks.

Please only use this button if i have made a silly mistake, if i have made a worse mistake, contact my talk page!

This user is a recent changes patroller.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for adding images, references, and more to articles! The Tips of Apmh (talk) 21:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

YESSS MY FIRST BARNSTAR! --InternetScavenger89

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
12	Cuisine of the Ionian Islands (talk)	Add sources
130	Lamian (talk)	Add sources
1,091	Cooking (talk)	Add sources
38	Cretan cuisine (talk)	Add sources
63	Weston A. Price Foundation (talk)	Add sources
826	Lard (talk)	Add sources
746	Spätzle (talk)	Cleanup
235	Cat food (talk)	Cleanup
277	Milk and meat in Jewish law (talk)	Cleanup
47	Canarian cuisine (talk)	Expand
5	Index of sociology of food articles (talk)	Expand
20	Balearic cuisine (talk)	Expand
488	Russian cuisine (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,363	Vegetarianism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
260	Textured vegetable protein (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
39	Kubbeh (talk)	Merge
52	Brik (talk)	Merge
42	Viewshed (talk)	Merge
33	Hōtō (talk)	Wikify
128	Gene bank (talk)	Wikify
2,447	Veganism (talk)	Wikify
21	Soul food health trends (talk)	Orphan
11	Food labelling in Canada (talk)	Orphan
2	Blikkiesdorp Project (talk)	Orphan
202	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
43	Farfel (talk)	Stub
65	TAP Sports (talk)	Stub
13	Maki mi (talk)	Stub
65	Czernina (talk)	Stub
112	Clément Novalak (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Y'know, I"m honestly kinda envious of you because I haven't been able to get SuggestBot to work on my talk page no matter what I've tried lol. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: You can just go to the teahouse "articles to improve" page i think --InternetScavenger89

Yep I know. (Also it's 4 ~ not 3, 4 adds your signature and a timestamp, 3 just adds your sig) ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: I'm not sure i know what you mean by that. 4 of what? Sorry, i do not understand. Also, what genre of things should i edit today?

4 tildes which is this character: ~. My guess is you don't actually have your custom signature set as your signature and instead are copying and pasting the code every time you sign. If you want to make your custom signature as your actual signature, all you have to do is go to Special:Preferences and scroll down to where it says signature, then just copy and paste the code of your signature into that box and click on the box that says "Treat the above as wikimarkup" and then click save at the bottom of the page. After that whenever you sign using 4 tildes like this ~~~~ it'll sign with that signature along with a timestamp. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your posts

Howdy. You seem to be having trouble signing your posts. It's 4 tildes that are used. GoodDay (talk) 17:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Is this acceptable? -> InternetScavenger89 (talk) 17:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC) --InternetScavenger89[reply]

Looks confusing. Your name, followed by the time & date, is best. GoodDay (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Hows this? -> --InternetScavenger89 InternetScavenger89 (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, your name is still being duplicated. GoodDay (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Is there anyway to keep the colored signature but still have a timestamp?

I've actually told you how you do so above. If you need any assistance in doing so feel free to ask. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: Forgive me, i was too caught up in trying to fix the edit war. --InternetScavenger89 18:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah it's alright. I noticed that you were signing with your name but no timestamp and figured I'd help you out. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: That deserves a trout slap for me right there ;-; --InternetScavenger89 18:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nah it doesn't. It's just a bit of the technical part of Wikipedia (I originally had my sig display &#124 ; instead of a pipe (|) because I didn't have the wiki markup box checked, but that was before I got this fancy sig). ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: You've been a big help thx :D

I actually came over here to see if there was a technical issue in your signature that needed resolving. Glad to see that Blaze beat me to it. Panini!^🥪 18:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Panini!: Yep, they just didn't know how to actually change their sig. Glad to see you attempting to help out though. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Panini!: Yeah, he helped me fix it. He's been a big help. Also, i am sorry about the edit war. What could i have done better? (i'm a he btw)--InternetScavenger89 18:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to come back and tell you. Luckily, there isn't anything else you could've done in that situation. WP:3RR is a rule where no user can revert the same content three times in a row. However, there are some exceptions to this, such as if you are reverting someone who is obviously doing persistent vandalism. In this case, this user is ignoring their warnings and continually reverting your fixes, therefore being a disruption and falling under this exception. Furthermore, the rule states that "edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism". Since we all agree with you that this editor is nothing but disruptive, you're perfectly fine. Panini!^🥪 18:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Panini!:Thank you for the information. I had previously read this rule, and when i realized i had broke it, i basically reported myself on the Administrator incident board. Good to know that we are fine. --InternetScavenger89 18:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, and like I said, if you have any questions feel free to ask on WP:TEA, which I do answer questions on from time to time (I think Panini might as well but I could be wrong). ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: I will do! I will also go and edit some other pages so i don't become an extended confirmed with just talk page edits ._. --InternetScavenger89 18:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep that's definitely a good idea. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: User:Bbb23 keeps reverting all of my edits and is saying they are disruptive. Will you please help? I am trying to fix copyedit. What can i do that's helpful that doesn't give me a wikiblockthreat.

I suggest you listen to them as they are an admin here on Wikipedia and are much more knowledgeable than I am. I suggest taking a look at WP:BRD. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:09, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while technically there is no rule against welcoming users with no edits, it's generally frowned upon as the welcome messages make mention of the user's contributions and if they've made none then it can be quite confusing. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze the Wolf: I understand Blaze, its just that he's reverted almost every single edit i've made today. I go and edit a page on the suggestions list, 3 minutes later, it is reverted. I don't get it.

--InternetScavenger89 19:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hence why I suggest you look at WP:BRD. Part of that process is discussing an edit that got reverted. If you don't understand why your edit was reverted the one thing you should not do is immediately make the edit again, and instead ask the user who reverted you why they did so. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: Ok. I understand it now. I just fixed another copyedit, and if he reverts it, i'll go to his talk page and politely ask him why. --InternetScavenger89 19:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Also, I suggest taking a look at WP:RS for what is and isn't a reliable source. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also also, on Wikipedia, we go by quality over quantity, meaning we prefer if a user has made a few decent edits, rather than a lot of edits that aren't all that good. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf:Do you think i have made some decent edits, or a lot of indecent edits? --InternetScavenger89 19:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not meaning to sound rude/harsh but I would say you've mostly made indecent edits, however you have made a few good edits. Since you appear to be interesting in antivandal work I suggest reading WP:VANDAL and possibly seeing if anyone available at WP:CVUA would be willing to assist you. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: Can you give me feedback on how i can improve on my other edits? --InternetScavenger89 19:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a better question to ask at the Teahouse as I'm unable to answer that question myself. However I do suggest you take a look at WP:CE since you also seem interested in copy-editing. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

@Blaze The Wolf: Thank you for helping me on my talk page

Welcoming new users

Hi InternetScavenger89,

I noticed you've been welcoming some new users recently, which is kind. However, the template you are using starts with "Thank you for your contributions". A couple of users you welcomed had already received warnings for vandalism (Users Badussias420, Has been blacklisted1) and one (EmSolaris) hasn't made any edits yet. It's a good idea to check the user's contributions first to make sure the message you're using is appropriate. If you're using the Twinkle tool there are a number of different welcome templates, including ones to use if their edits are unconstructive/tests or outright vandalism.

Kind regards, Princess Persnickety (talk) 21:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC) :)[reply]

Let me echo what Princess is saying. Look at WP:Welcoming committee. This will give you ideas as well as let you know what is expected of you when you welcome new accounts. It's recommended that you check their contributions first. Mistakes happen and you are being bold which we, as a community, and I, as a mentor, want you to continue to do. Just remember to be conscious of your own actions and its impact.

--ARose Wolf 13:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ARoseWolf: If they have a warning from User:ClueBotNG, should i still welcome them?

I'd say, if they have any warnings at all then you might consider not welcome templating them but certain circumstances may allow for it. It's always best to check their contributions first. Don't forget to sign your comments with four tildes so everyone knows it's you making the comment rather than having to look it up. :) --ARose Wolf 12:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Next three posts at bottom of archive one. I have not forgotten them and i have read them over many times

@Blaze The Wolf: I have archived these sections, yet i will not forget what they said. If you wish me to undo that I will do so.

It's not your fault!

Re "I am so sorry, i didn't mean to get anyone blocked": It's not your fault! The IP editor themselves was being disruptive and refusing to abide by our rules, so banning them was the only option and determined upon by several other editors. You did the right thing by reporting it. Panini!^🥪 13:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Panini!: By the way, i like the "Me trying to pull myself from my work" meme on your talk page. Its pretty funnny.

Please stay away from noticeboards, do some content work.

Your replies on various noticeboard threads are not constructive. Work on building the encyclopedia until you have a reasonable amount of experience before trying to get involved in governance and disputes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish:Thank you for alerting me on my talk page. I appreciate the feedback, and will put it into practice. Is there something wrong with what i said on the edit-war noticeboard? I would like to understand. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InternetScavenger89 (talk • contribs)

Involving yourself in disputes that have nothing to do with you will generally only increase the drama, especially when you have little experience. The admins patrolling the edit warring noticeboard are more than capable of sussing out what should be done. Statements like this are also unhelpful. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish: I have reverted that edit. --InternetScavenger89 18:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And in doing so you removed contributions by other editors, so I undid that edit. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted what I think is the edit you meant to revert, InternetScavenger. FWIW, I concur with what ScottishFinnishRadish has said here. I got involved in noticeboards very early on in my wiki-career, and came to greatly regret it. It took me years to get past a reputation as someone drawn to drama, and at one point I got blocked just for "standing too close to the fire", as it were. Much better to focus on other things. These days, even though I have enough experience that I could probably lurk at ANI all the time if I wanted, I really only show up if there's an incident I'm involved in, and I'm much happier that way. All the best. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 18:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin: I understand. I am noticing that i am learning a lot too

And now you're adding maintenance templates to articles. You're pushing the envelope, inch by inch. You're not here to do admin-like work, or even the work of an experienced editor. You've been told to stop, over and over again, and yet instead of sticking to gnome-like, "safe" edits, you branch out into new inappropriate areas. I can't speak for the others who have warned you repeatedly, but you're testing my patience.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you stop using Twinkle until you become a more experienced editor. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Is it okay if i do nothing but copyedit for a little while? --InternetScavenger89 19:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it is constructive and necessary. However I still recommend disabling Twinkle so you aren't tempted to use it until you've become more experienced. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: Twinkle has been disabled. --InternetScavenger89 03:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at the Guild of Copy Editors Request page

Hi InternetScavenger89, regarding your edits here, did you intend to request a copy-edit (c/e) of Brasserie Ellezelloise or to inform us you have partially copy-edited it? If it's the former, can you please clarify the request and remove the "{{partly done}}" template? The article doesn't seem promotional to me and doesn't appear to need a copy-edit. If it's the latter, this is not the purpose of the page and only copy-editors who've worked on a request but would like another editor to continue the c/e should place that template there. Please also note someone has reverted your edit at Brasserie Ellezelloise. If you don't really want a copy-edit, please either remove the subsection or place "{{withdrawn}}" below your request and sign with four tildes like this: ~~~~. Thank you, Baffle☿gab 07:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry too much about the above; seeing your edits at the article were reverted, I've removed the Partly Done template from your request, which will be dealt with dreckly. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 18:17, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dream (YouTuber)

Generally, it's best not to respond to bait like that. Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 07:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, if you ever need additional help, there's WP:Discord which is always open.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 07:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL: Why did I get pinged from this? ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Do you have the Newcomer Homepage enabled? If not I think that's a good place to start. Click on Preferences at top right, scroll down to the bottom under User Profile and click on the box beside Display newcomer homepage. Among other things there is a box labeled Suggested Edits. This is a great place to begin and learn how to properly edit articles. I also highly, highly suggest you stay away from noticeboards and the like, even AfD's. Most of it is drama and you don't want to fuel that. Let the admin's do what they are here for. If you have an issue that requires the use of one of these noticeboards then use it. Twinkle can get a lot of new editors in trouble fast so disabling it until you have a better understanding was a great idea. Remember I suggested listening to others was important. Editors like @Drmies, @Bbb23 and @Tamzin are well experienced. I have watched their actions here and respect them a lot so trust me when I say taking their advice is the best thing you could do. I know you are new to Wikipedia. I know you have the best of intentions. Read, read, read! Make small edits and learn the policies. If you decide to write a new article, highly recommended, then pick something you have an interest in but is noncontroversial. Above all else, stay off noticeboards and stay away from templates until you can learn their purpose. I have never warned anyone for vandalism. I have rarely warned anyone for anything and, to my knowledge, haven't templated anyone outside welcoming them. Yet I have made my mistakes too so it happens, we all do it and its part of being bold. Still, when you are given advice, take it and apply it where appropriate. If you have any other questions or concerns don't hesitate to ask. --ARose Wolf 12:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ARoseWolf: I'm fairly sure they do (Hence the reason they're able to ask you question on your talk page). ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blaze The Wolf, Possibly :) When I joined the program as a test subject I was able to send messages to my mentor without having the homepage enabled but I'm not sure how it all works now. Hopefully words of advice are heeded though. --ARose Wolf 13:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: The newcomer homepage for me is enabled --InternetScavenger89 16:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

I suggest you take a look at WP:UP to see what is and isn't appropriate for your userpage. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Viewer Statistics

Hello! I noticed you included a box for conducting how many views your user page has. Here's a tip if you're on a computer; go into the article history, and under the filter revisions tab lies a row of external tools. Hit "Page Statistics", and you can see all sorts of info about a page (including user pages), such as viewer stats, who has the most edits, the user who authored most of the page, etc. Alternatively, you can put {{Annual readership}} at the top of your talk page for quick access to viewership stats. Panini!^🥪 17:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Panini!: Thank you for the help! #template added --InternetScavenger89 18:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for significant competence concerns and checkuser confirmed evidence of vandalism and trolling.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze The Wolf: What! WHY! I can edit and i have been doing better! What is checkuser anyways? --InternetScavenger89 19:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InternetScavenger89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to build an encyclopedia as shown at the top of my talk page. I do not know exactly why i am blocked, and i am working and will continue to work on making better edits, but i cannot continue to do so while blocked. Finally, does indefinite mean never able to edit again? --InternetScavenger89 19:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed logged out vandalism and trolling. See WP:GOODHAND. Yamla (talk) 19:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Accounts cannot be deleted, and you are not entitled to say you are "retired". Next inappropriate edit, and Talk page access will be revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert all of my innapropriate edits, and then please ban this user from wikipedia. I'm tired of trying to stay alive on wikipedia. I have now left --InternetScavenger89 19:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 51647

UTRS appeal #51647 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]