Hello, Inventorfrog, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 17:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tetralogy of Fallot has been reverted. Your edit here to Tetralogy of Fallot was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4858/tetrologysurgery.jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While I do believe Chanel was involved with Nazism, I do have misgivings about the Vaughn book (particularly as he appears to have as much knowledge about fashion as a maggoty cabbage) as a rock-solid source. The lede may seem to tiptoe around the issue, but given that the Nazi argument is clearly described in the text (although very, very over-reliant on Vaughn to support it.), I feel there isn't a need for it to be stated point blank as uncontroversial fact in the lede - particularly as the House of Chanel strongly deny it (their denial is well-covered in the text too). That's why I reverted the edits. When further research emerges to balance out, and either back up or refute Vaughn's findings, then we can revisit this. For now, it is a confirmed fact that she did make controversial life choices, particularly during the Second World War, and such a statement is sufficent for the lede. Mabalu (talk) 10:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
