User talk:Ip208man

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Ip208man, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Oo7565 (talk) 19:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Laurence Leamer[edit]

Updated DYK query On 27 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Laurence Leamer, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 17:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Hamilton[edit]

Hi there - I noticed that you moved this page. When you get a moment, would you mind now fixing all the links in other articles that now point to a disambiguation page so that they point to the new page title? Thanks, BencherliteTalk 22:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nigel Hamilton (author)[edit]

Updated DYK query On January 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nigel Hamilton (author), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 14:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Deborah Jeane Palfrey[edit]

I had looked at the talk page for the article but had not noticed discussion of the Jones interview. Regardless, my edit was not putting forth a particular POV but simply restating a direct quote from Ms. Palfrey, the veracity of which AFAIK is uncontested, regardless of what kind of nut interviewed her (though I'd argue that he's no less reputable than radio personalities like Bill O'Reilly or Rush Limbaugh who are doubtless quoted somewhere on Wikipedia). I am not an advocate of conspiracy theories, and I resent that implication from your edit comment, though I do believe that Ms. Palfrey's recorded statements on the matter of the case against her are extremely relevant, regardless of the venue in which they appeared. Certainly they should carry more weight than those of some posthumous biographer. DaveWF (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: not a high quality link[edit]

(Undid revision 283193497 by RoosterEnroughty (talk) rmv unneeded EL. not a high quality link) (undo)

Would you mind explaining what was not 'quality' about that article. It clearly and accuratly lays out all the issues in the case. emacsuser (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah Jeane Palfrey[edit]

If you can, could you please keep an eye on the Deborah Jeane Palfrey -- I have an anon IP who is dying to add in the "truth" using the standard conspiracy theories. I've reverted him twice and I think he may be persistent. Thanks! ∴ Therefore cogito·sum 04:01, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

C. Daniel Clemente (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Attorney, Republican Party, Al Casey and Rector

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for C. Daniel Clemente[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]