User talk:Irishguy/Archive 20

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

→

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

203.89.172.130

thanks for blocking this vandal Jru Gordon 02:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem. :) IrishGuy ^talk 02:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

170.215.153.80

There is a guy on this IP who makes random changes to Transformers articles which are nonsensical. I have to constantly monitor it and revert them. Can he be blocked? user_talk:mathewignash —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 02:51, August 20, 2007 (UTC).

He hasn't received any warnings for vandalism. You can find warning templates at WP:UTM and if he persists, you can report him at WP:AIV. IrishGuy ^talk 02:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Wrestling

Why are you deleting my articles? i'm just doing this for my wrestling association

please answer —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bergurking (talk • contribs) 19:04, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

Bergurking 19:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC) do you know more about iceland then me frosti bergsson is an icelandic millionare bergur frostason is an icelandic wrestler and rwa is a wrestling promotion

answer me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bergurking (talk • contribs) 19:08, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

Please read WP:COI. You shouldn't be writing about an organization you are affiliated with. Beyond that, you created a single sentence article about a person with no assertion of importance and no references at all. IrishGuy ^talk 19:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Sir, It is evident that you don't want the other readers of wikipedia to see the content of that link. This links is evidently appropriate for the subject covered and presents an alternative view of the same subject treated here. The fact that it does not say that this document is a fraud bothers you, so you have made an excuse for it to remove it. You try to look cool, but you have been dishonest with me at worst or grossly negligent in your comments at best. Please provide a precise explanation why you want to censor this link (your response was merely a cut and paste of wikipedia policy and does not apply here, evidently). No alternative opinion or view is expressed in this document as it should be to keep it neutral. Regards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.218.11.70 (talk)

Removing spam isn't "censoring". It isn't a reliable source, it isn't even remotely neutral or encyclopedic. It is spam. Stop. IrishGuy ^talk 20:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

You are calling names but you refuse to respond. Labeling webistes "spam" does necessarily make them so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.218.11.70 (talk) 20:56, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

I did respond. The fact that you don't happen to like the response doesn't negate it. IrishGuy ^talk 21:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Clive Barker sites

You seem to be erasing two legitimate Clive Barker sites used as references for various articles, including some articles for which I can personally vouch has having use those sites. I'd like to show good faith that you are not simply removing these sites out of a dislike for the author Barker. You are, however, methodically erasing these through Wikipedia, and I'm not sure how one can be confident that they were never used as reference. Any talk-page explanation on these sites would be appropriate; saying just "linkspam" doesn't fully give reasoning regarding what seem to be standard non-commercial websites. Thanks. --Tenebrae 23:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

A year ago 85.210.225.157 simply spammed these links into about fifty article. No content was added, simply the highly promotional link about the link having a archive of fascinating comment. In Clive Barker's article...fine. In the fifty other articles they were spammed into...no. IrishGuy ^talk 23:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I did look through some of the Barker links elsewhere, and they were indeed appended with promotional comments. I've no input as to those links, and can only say the Barker/Razorline links were legit. You might want to check if some of the other ones you removed were OK, i.e., had no appended promo statements. In any case, thanks again for the collegial collaboration. Cheers, --Tenebrae 02:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem. If they belonged in an article (e.g. Clive Barker, Cenobite, etc.) I mainly left them in place...but the bulk of them were clearly promotional and added to many articles where they just didn't belong (e.g. a link to the website because Barker wrote a forward to a book once). IrishGuy ^talk 02:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

SAVE Program

Please undelete this file that I load yesterday. I am with the United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and I'm the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program Chief. I'm attempting to load a page about this program that I manage for USCIS. I am the owner of this information and have permission to post it here. Thanks. Boundsdh 11:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)David H. Bounds David.Bounds@DHS.gov USCIS/NSRV/VER Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program Chief 490 L’Enfant Plaza East, S.W. Suite 8027 Washington, DC 20024-2135 202-358-7807 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Boundsdh (talk • contribs) 11:54, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

You just erased an article I made. Is this some kind of Gestapo on Wikipedia? If you feel that the page is lacking, say so. I can work on it further. Especially if the page is edited by some registered user.--Sebastian Stadil 02:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

It was an article about a company with no assertion of notability or importance. Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising. IrishGuy ^talk 02:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

why do you keep on deleting my pages. they are representing me my friends and my company do not delete anymore thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kloc-187 (talk • contribs) 20:20, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

Stop attempting to use wikipedia to promote yourself. Please read WP:COI. IrishGuy ^talk 20:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

L-CAT

I recently added a full article named l-cat and i would like you to undelete it, it had all information and it was an original aticle.. thanks----it was added i believe on August 21,2007..—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Soulsearchers03 (talk • contribs) 03:28, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for blocking vandal Lan Cafe Whatever. It was very much appreciated. AngelOfSadness talk 00:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all. IrishGuy ^talk 00:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm saying thanks again for the block placed on the editing privledges of User:AngryAryan. AngelOfSadness talk 00:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Again, no problem at all. :) IrishGuy ^talk 00:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I feel I am being discriminated against

I followed the rules regarding posting links on article pages and have used the discussion page to get a link approved. However if you take a look at the talk page for the Emigrate article you will see the points I have made and so far the only responses I have gotten seem a little hypocritical and prejudiced against me personally. The reasons I have been given for not being able to post a link are because 'fan sites' are of little value and offer 'nothing exceptionally unique or informational'. However this article and many others on wikipedia allow links to fan sites that are little more than shrines with very little info at all. I feel that the website I am trying to get approved holds very comprehensive information on the subject and would be of value. Others have posted links to the site but these have been removed too even though other people clearly feel that the link should be there.

Please see the article and discussion page for further info. Emigrateunofficial 13:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

You aren't being prejudiced against. Fansites ordinarily fail WP:EL across the board and are routinely removed from articles. IrishGuy ^talk 20:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

In that case why are there hundreds of wiki pages with fan sites and one-page shrines listed that have been there for ages without removal? I feel this should be a no exceptions blanket rule that is properly enforced or sites with detailed and appropriate info allowed. The following pages are just a few for example: Richard Z Kruspe, Shotgun Messiah, Motley Crue, Michael Wincott, Patricia Arquette, PIG, etc. Plus it was noted that if others feel it is a valid link and they added it then that was ok. I was told by several people this had been done but those links were removed too. Emigrateunofficial 12:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Mary Christina Brown discussion

So I read the discussion on this article on this actress/producer..It sounds like your staff is saying she is not legit or that her credits are not true? Is there a way to resolve this problem or can someone help assist the article? Go ahead to http://www.hollywood.com/celebrity/Mary_Christina_Brown/3595550

or other sites for proof that she is not an extra. Look forward to hearing from you! :) whitney —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marychristina8 (talk • contribs) 20:42, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

That link gives her exactly one credit. How does that make her notable? IrishGuy ^talk 20:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Edit count discrepancy

Hey man, I've got a question for you, if that's okay. I was in my preferences making myself a signature and I noticed that an edit count was listed; however, it's much higher than the one listed by Kate's tool (Wikipedia says 1799, Kate's tool says 1420). I know the discrepancy comes from deleted articles, but my question is, which do people usually go by? Thanks! GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 02:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

I assume you are asking in reference to a potential future RfA, am I correct? In that case, Kate's tool is usually what is used. IrishGuy ^talk 02:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Well yeah, RfA was one context I was thinking of, but I don't want you to think I'm obsessed with becoming an admin. :P I had also been thinking of users who have those "this user has more than blank edits" userboxes, or list their important milestone edits, but I supppose that varies from person to person. Anyhow, thanks. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 04:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

hi again

Hi. Irishguy,

So Im trying to understand what to do...so are you going to delete Mary Christina Brown for WIKIPEDIA? or can you assist me on how to make it work? Should I have a professional redue this article? There are so many actors and actresses who are on the site and they dont have as many credits as Mary Christina. She's up and coming and has some movies coming out later this year. What should we do?

Please let me know...

Thank you so much!

Whitney —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marychristina8 (talk • contribs) 02:26, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

If you have a conflict of interest you shouldn't be editing the article at all. The AfD will be decided on policy, namely WP:NOTE and WP:BIO. IrishGuy ^talk 02:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

ICanSeeTheWarnerBrosTowerFromHere

You didn't like that guy's post, huh? Odd place to post it, I agree, but I'd probably leave it if it were my talk page. That's just me of course, though. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 09:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Yow, you blocked the guy? What did he do? GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 09:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

He posted the same screed in numerous places. Those were the only edits he had made. It was an obvious single purpose trolling account...most likely created by the same people/person who was pushing the Mary Christina Brown‎ promotional article. IrishGuy ^talk 09:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

BS ISO/IEC TR 13335-4:2000

Is BS ISO/IEC TR 13335-4:2000 a legit article? It doesn't look like it to me and since I'm not extremely familiar with articles such as these in particular, I'm not sure whether to tag it csd or orphan... -WarthogDemon 23:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

It was a cut-and-paste job from one of the links. Deleted as a copyvio. IrishGuy ^talk 23:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Bah, I should've checked. :P I had a gut feeling it was a copyvio; I'm never sure when to listen to my gut. Oh well, thanks! :) -WarthogDemon 23:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

L-Cat

Hey i am trying to get my article added on August 21, 2007. It was tittled L-CAT, if you could undelete it , it would be greatly appreciated, it was original and i do have the original document. I know it is just a concept, but it is very important to me.....

thanks---soulsearchers03 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulsearchers03 (talk • contribs) 02:13, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't accept original research. IrishGuy ^talk 02:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

caresupport page deleted.

Hi Irishguy.

My http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caresupport page is deleted. Actually I creted redirect page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caresupport/ to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caresupport so that I can add http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caresupport in googlebot webmaster tools Googlebot doesnot accept http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caresupport and its accepts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caresupport/ (Last forward slash is required) Pls help.

Regards Yogesh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caresupport (talk • contribs)

Please read WP:COI. Wikipedia is not a venue to advertise your organization. IrishGuy ^talk 09:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Irishguy. I know but ultimately wikipedia is also crawled by googlebot so pls try to understand the importance of googlebot.I dont advertise my organisation but I do make my link to bot friendly.

Regards Yogesh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.136.251.211 (talk • contribs)

Again, Wikipedia isn't a venue for advertising. IrishGuy ^talk 09:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Irishguy.

Ok can you pls restore my page I will stop making changes to it. I will keep it as it is.( I started this page 1-2 week back and edited it with caresupport/. I will stop that.

Regards Yogesh.

As I noted twice, Wikipedia isn't for advertising. IrishGuy ^talk 09:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Irishguy,

I know but can you pls restore my page which was there for 1-2 week.I will follow your instructions and I aplologises.

Regards Yogesh.

Penthouse Hotel

Hi Irishguy, my page about Penthouse Hotel had been deleted saying the context was too short, so I've re-edited it, can you please check it once again. Thankyou and appreciate your time and effort.

Defination of Penthouse Hotel ... A boutique hotel, usually small, and not a member of an International Chain, catering for niche customers, generally those (single or adventurous couples requiring a little more spice than what is offered by the usual family hotel, the emphasis being more on entertainment/nightlife.

Penthousehotel 09:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)penthouse hotel

That's nice. IrishGuy ^talk 09:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Penthouse Hotel

Hi again Irishguy, Referring to my previous message, you've replied "that's nice" ... can you please suggest if it is acceptable enough to be re-submitted?

Thankyou.

Penthousehotel 09:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I replied "nice" to an out of context definition. You added more after my reply.

Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. IrishGuy ^talk 09:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Irishguy, thanks for replying ... Can you take some time to explain what should I do in order to get my article added. What's missing/what's needed apart from my present content?

Penthousehotel 09:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

It is nothing more than a definition. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. IrishGuy ^talk 09:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

... Thankyou, I understand its not a dictionary, and what I've contributed is just a mere defination of one's experiences .. is my content good enough to be submitted?

Penthousehotel 09:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou

Thankyou for fixing my talk page!! I must have upset a badger somewhere along th line!! Woodym555 10:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all. :) IrishGuy ^talk 10:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Badger

I noticed your writeup on that guy. That's technically known as "witnessing the badger". Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 10:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

What is embarassingly pathetic is that I had to actually read that aloud to myself before I got the joke. :( IrishGuy ^talk 11:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Punnishment. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 11:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Red Sox vs. Yankees

OK, on to the important stuff. On June 29 and again on August 3, I pointed out to an e-mail pal, who's a lifelong Red Sox fan, some hard realities for the Yankees fans...

On June 29, the Red Sox (48-29 .623) were 11 games up on the Yankees (36-39 .480).

On August 3, the Red Sox (66-42 .611) were 8 games up on the Yankees (58-50 .537) and the Yankees would have to gain a game a week for the rest of the season in order to catch the Red Sox.

My point at those times was that overcoming a double-digit lead becomes more and more difficult as the season progresses. Those early losses weigh on a team like an anchor.

Through Sunday, August 26, the Red Sox sit at (80-51 .611) and the Yankees at (72-58 .554) or 7 1/2 games back. So the "Yank-me" team (as he calls them) have played well, but the Red Sox continue to play well also, and thus the Yanks have gained only half a game in three-plus weeks.

The Red Sox have 31 games left on their schedule, and the Yankees have 32 (including 6 with each other).

If the Red Sox go just .500 the rest of the way (15-16 or 16-15) they will end up with 95 or 96 wins. To reach 95 wins the Yanks will have to go 23-9 the rest of the way.
If the Red Sox go just .550 (17-14) instead of their consistent over-.600 pace, and end up with 97 wins, the Yanks will have to go 25-7 to catch them.
If the Red Sox continue to play at .611 (18-13 or 19-12), they will end up with 98 or 99 wins, and the Yanks will have to go at least 26-6 to catch them.

During July the Yanks went 22-11, but during August they went 24-8. So it's do-able, but they have to continue their pace of the last 4 weeks and hope that the Red Sox slip, because winning alone won't quite do it for them.

However, that's all just theory. They face each other 3 times this week. d:)

The above is statistically factual, and could be included in an article. Thus I'm allowed to put it on a talk page. 0:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 11:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

A great deal depends upon how they play each other. Boston has been dominating Tampa Bay and they play them six more times. Baltimore has suddenly been fairly solid so those games could go for or against Boston. If Boston can at least split the game with New York...the Yankees might be screwed. Otherwise...the Yanks could do what they historically do...make a stirring comeback and force every Boston fan to punch walls and be drunk for six months. :) IrishGuy ^talk 11:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Every season is different. It is not possible for a team to come back from 3-games-to-none in the post-season. Yet the Red Sox did it to the Yankees in 2004 and then won the Series - they were the Team of Destiny. It is not possible to come back from 14 1/2 games out in mid-July. Yet the Yankees did it to the Red Sox in 1978 and then won the Series - they were the Team of Destiny. We don't yet know who this year's team of destiny is - it could be the Red Sox, or the Yankees, or the Angels, or the Mariners, or the Padres, or the F-ing Mets, or maybe even (gasp!) the Cubs. Looking at 1978, on the morning of July 19 the Red Sox were 61-28 and the Yankees were 47-42, 14 games back. [1][2] The Yanks went 52-21 while the Bosox went 38-35, prior to the infamous playoff game, so overall it's not so much that the Red Sox flopped (they actually came back in September after trailing by 3 1/2 at one point), it's that the Yanks played at a torrid pace and made up the ground. The Yanks came into Boston in early September and swept the Sox in four-game series, and part of a serious early-September slump. So the Red Sox basically have to avoid a losing streak. This week's series is at the Stadium, but it's only 3 games, so the best the Yanks can expect to be at its conclusion is 4 games out. And if the Red Sox even win 1 of 3, it puts a damper on the Yanks. History can be misleading. Every season is different. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 11:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, the Cubbies have the lead and your Twins aren't that far out of it either. You may be a very happy man come the end of September, :) IrishGuy ^talk 12:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

CSD AutoReason Updated

Attention spamlist! I've just updated CSD AutoReason to account for the new image deletion page. If you'd just hard refresh (Ctrl+F5 in most browsers), you'll get the new version and be on your way. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 17:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Maniac Cop 1-3 & William Lustig

I don't see how I'm spamming when I'm leaving a link to a site dedicated to the Maniac Cop movies & their director, William Lustig. I could see if I was shoving the link down peoples' throats, which I'm not. I'm simply adding to pages that are RELATED to the movies & that particular director but obviously it's wrong to add links related to a particular article. Thanks for constantly making me waste my time. I really appreciate it.

Oltrelamorte 15:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)oltrelamorte

Per WP:SPAM - Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. IrishGuy ^talk 19:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

But it'd be ok if my site was official? Even though official sites added to the external pages of articles or user pages are meant to promote that particular site. Pretty lame if you ask me but whatever. You might want to check around for other spammers. Oltrelamorte 22:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)oltrelamorte

I don't recall asking you what you did or didn't think was "lame". Of course you think it is "lame" that you can't spam Wikipedia with promotional links to your own website. IrishGuy ^talk 22:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't recall either but I'm glad to be of service, friend. You probably have no idea about the website or its contents. You just take your job too seriously and delete away when there are a lot more worse problems on Wikipedia. There's a lot more "spam" to care of out there. You'd better get busy. Oltrelamorte 22:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)oltrelamorte

Yep. That's pretty much the by-the-numbers complaint I get from every spammer I catch. IrishGuy ^talk 22:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Why!

Did You Delete Massachusetts program captures attention of states!! Why Did You Delete Judge to allow 42 abuse suits to go to trial!!! Did You!!! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! KingShwartz 16:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Badger vandal

Hello. I wouldn't worry about that vandal. I've been trying to work out a connection between the handful of people he's picking on, but can't come up with one. (Often if a group of people were involved in a particular cause, they are a target, but I can't remember if we've worked together before?) Anyway, if he wants to waste his time creating accounts, so be it. It takes longer for him to do that than for someone to revert and block. The JPS ^{talk to me} 18:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Ahaha! It's the return of the Fred Moss‎/Christopher Nudds vandal. The JPS ^{talk to me} 18:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

~~Perhaps a RFCU-IP would help? Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 18:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)~~ Never mind... I saw that it's already filed. Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 19:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I think it is tied in with this vandal. IrishGuy ^talk 20:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Definitely. I recall that name from last year. The JPS ^{talk to me} 20:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Admin coaching?

Hey man, this might sound a little odd, but...might you be willing to be my admin coach? I submitted a coach request here, but it seems like the project is mostly self-activating. I know you're not listed as a coach, but I think you'd be a fitting teacher because you're most active in the areas that I plan to help out with when I (hopefully) get the mop, ie. vandal fighting and its associated pages (ANI, AIV, RFCU, etc). Feel free to say no, of course, but I thought I'd ask. Thanks! GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 23:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, it's not something that I have ever done (admin coaching) but if you'd like me to try, I will give it a go. IrishGuy ^talk 00:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Cyfarthfa High School

The article Cyfarthfa High School has been recreated, and by appearances, it is a recreation of the same content in that old URL. However... that URL no longer has the content, so it looks like this time it was retrieved from a WP mirror. Could you please look at the page history and work with this? Thanks. The Evil Spartan 21:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC) PS. I wonder if a salting is in order, given the frequency of copyright problems with this article. The Evil Spartan 21:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

It seems to have different content than the previous versions. I have been unable to find any evidence of a copyvio for this version. IrishGuy ^talk 22:24, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

I believe the evidence would be here. It's clearly a cached version of the page that the bot has picked up on a mirror. The Evil Spartan 22:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

The article at http://en.allexperts.com/e/c/cy/cyfarthfa_high_school.htm appears to be different text from the current article. IrishGuy ^talk 23:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

You're right, a lot of it is. However, not all of it: search for Cyfarthfa High School was established in 1970 following the amalgamation of Cyfarthfa Castle Grammar School and Georgetown Secondary Modern School. The Evil Spartan 23:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Abuse of Authority

There are thousands of articles on Wikipedia whose external links include fansites. I'm not going to cite examples, because then sad, power-hungry individuals like yourself would indiscriminately blast them all. It's unfortunate that you have decided to single out an article about a B-movie most people have never heard of to abuse your authority. ManiacCopFans.com was begun by a friend and I to raise awareness of the movie. We have the blessing and support of Bill Lustig (director), Larry Cohen (writer), Robert Z'Dar, and Bruce Campbell. Yet, you seem to believe that this link violates a vague and subjective rule which is almost never enforced. The term "spam" denotes unsolicited marketing, not a link to a fansite. We make exactly zero dollars from the website, and it's only intended as a place for people to gather and discuss the films. How can you ignore links to "official" movie sites (which are clearly commercial) and instead focus on ours? People like you are ruining Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kd4nuh (talk • contribs)

No, spammers and people promoting themselves/their companies are the problem. Spamming your own link into various articles is a violation of WP:SPAM, WP:EL, and WP:COI. Stop. IrishGuy ^talk 23:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

POV

The POV of my edits have only been what is true. I have not made any edits which are vandalism or POV. 75.32.38.191 12:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Adding the neofascism category to the American Civil Liberties Union article is both POV and vandalism. IrishGuy ^talk 20:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

No more POV than any other organization in the neofascism category that doesn't self-identify as neofascism. 75.32.38.191 22:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

E-mail

Please check your e-mail for a note I sent you and another admin on an administrative matter. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Middle Years Scholars Program

Why do you keep deleting the article Middle Years Scholars Program? I gave the significance of MYSP, yet you kept deleting it with the reason that it didn't give significance. --Oboeboy 21:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

A program from your middle school isn't notable. IrishGuy ^talk 21:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

By your thinking, this article wouldn't be notable either. --Oboeboy 21:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

hello

why was my article deleted off i write articles about singers i dont understand why you are deteling my articles off i havent done anything bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisahill85 (talk • contribs)

Please read WP:NOTE, WP:BIO and WP:BAND. IrishGuy ^talk 23:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

SMART Recovery

You deleted the article 'SMART Recovery' before I was even done editing it, with the explanation of "Blatant Copyright Infringement.'

Could you please explain how this is even remotely possible?

Oldefarquer 22:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Oldefarquer

It was content cut-and-pasted from the website. IrishGuy ^talk 23:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

hey

well can i do the article again? I NEED THIS ARTICLE IN WIKIPEDIA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisahill85 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

If you need Wikipedia to promote someone, that person isn't notable enough to be in Wikipedia. IrishGuy ^talk 18:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Key Deer

Well, I guess I can't argue with you deleting my paragraph regarding the origin of Key Deer, based on the Wikipedia definition of OR. I do not have documentation I can readily supply to support what I wrote. I grew up on Big Pine Key among very old fishermen who remembered Flagler relocating White-tail Deer to the Keys. I honestly don't know whether anyone has documented this and was simply trying to get the truth out. I'm a big believer in protecting these animals and believe that over development has ruined much of what I cherished growing up. But one of my pet-peeves is rewritten history. I never met a Key's resident who didn't find the notion of a glacial bridge over coral islands laughable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FormerConch (talk • contribs) 01:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

hello

they are notable on the internet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisahill85 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

hey

they are notable on the internet. this will be great to put in wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisahill85 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Again, please read WP:NOTE, WP:BIO and WP:BAND. Wikipedia is not a venue for promotion. IrishGuy ^talk 23:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Yankees-Red Sox rivalry

Despite sweeping the Red Sox last week, the Yankees now sit 7 games back. So far, this is not 1978. Two words: Clay Buchholz. "The child shall lead them." Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 10:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

So you have to go and risk jinxing it like that? :( IrishGuy ^talk 10:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

My Cubs are currently in first place, it's September, and you're worried about a jinx? :) :) :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 11:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

DryShips

Hi, i'm trying to add an article for a Greek company called DryShips. Notable because it employees Greeks and contributes to Greek economy. Is it ok to add? Freecyprus 10:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOTE and WP:CORP. Please stop recreating deleted articles. IrishGuy ^talk 10:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

hey

well i can't argue with you i guess i can do the article when he gets famous in 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisahill85 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Fingerlights

The Way That Guy Posts Makes My Brain Scream. What's Up With That, Anyway? HalfShadow 22:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

jonathan swartout

I would like to know why you deleted my article about jonathan swartout. Please tell me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laniemae (talk • contribs) 22:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

It was an attack page. IrishGuy ^talk 23:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Electrocrunk

Hey,

Can you please advise me on how to properly explain Electrocrunk? I thought I did the ebst job possible with the immediate resources I knew of. I think it's important to have this article and was going to continue to fill it out as best as possible over the next few days.

Can you suggest what to do?

Thanks, CE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris English (talk • contribs) 18:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The entire article was nothing more than an advertisement for "self-proclaimed pioneer" Shane Fontane...a non-notable musician. IrishGuy ^talk 18:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Michael Mailer Edits

Hi I was editing / creating Michael Mailer when you were doing some edits - can you jump back in when you get a chance to make sure I didn't screw anything up that you did. BustOut 22:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The article looks fine. No edit conflicts. :) IrishGuy ^talk 22:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The Game of Pimlico

Hi Irishguy,

I see you deleted the page I just created (my first one!) on the game that some of my friends ivented a while back. Although it is written in a not entirely serious style, it is a description of a game and it does make sense when you read the rules section. I intend to link it to volleyball variants and swimming pool entries so that others can play it. Anyway, I can't really see how it falls under either definition of 'patent nonsense'. Let me know what you think.

wikipimlico Wikipimlico 22:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

WIkipedia is not for things made up in school one day. We also don't accept original research. IrishGuy ^talk 22:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Have to support this here. I play a fun game with my kids called zurburt identifier which has many rules but God forbid I add it to WP. BustOut 23:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Electrocrunk

Hi there, I have spent considerable time trying to fix this article from being more than spam for some NN DJ. It appears to be an actual new genre of music, but that dude keeps hijacking the article for his own purposes, as if he alone created a whole form of music. Is it just too new? Is it salvagable? When do we give up? Bearian 14:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

The article as it stands is largely promotional. If the Shane Fontane promotional material is stripped out, it may be possible to salvage it. IrishGuy ^talk 14:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey Guys,

I do not think it's fair to dismiss electrocrunk from wiki. Remove Shane's name if that's the problem. Who cares? I like his work and genre. I dont care if his name is in it. lol. Whatever. There are plenty of artists across the world in underground electronic scene that have heard of this genre, although it is relatively new. Should it go unrecorded just because 4 people on wiki believe it's non notable? - signed: "that dude" lol

WWR

hi, i noticed you deleted my wwr article before i gto to finish it

Denzillacey 22:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Q-Bah

Hey Irish guy! How are you?

For some reason the page for Q-Bah has been deleted. I worked on it for and with him (he's my cousin), because my English is good and I wanted to write something about him that would interest the readers. I've added more than 30 sources and facts. Q-Bah is a radio-dj here and we're all very proud of him. He's interviewed big artists such as Sean Paul and because he's on the radio every day, hés also on a copple of cd's with famous artists. I think peeps def. would like to know more about him. If it's just a matter of writing it differentely or editing, please let me know andI will edit the file right away.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Kind regards,

Michael Maidwell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.251.150.163 (talk) 23:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Elisha Cuthbert

As a previous contributor to this article, I'd like to invite you to express your opinion. THere have been a number of issues recently, and we ahve reached consensus on all but one of them: whether or not a Canadian flagicon should be included in the infobox. Please express your opinion, along with your reasons, at Talk:Elisha Cuthbert#Good work. Thank you. — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 22:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)