Jump to content

User talk:Isabelle Blake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix LaHaye (September 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by StartOkayStop were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
StartOkayStop (talk) 18:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Isabelle Blake! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StartOkayStop (talk) 18:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix LaHaye (September 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Updated! Isabelle Blake (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Price John (October 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Price John (October 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix LaHaye (October 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PK650 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PK650 (talk) 04:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sharon Price John has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sharon Price John. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Price John (October 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Price John (October 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 23:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix LaHaye (November 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 16:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no clue what you mean by unsourced, considering the number of sources included from reputable institutions. Isabelle Blake (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Price John has been accepted

[edit]
Sharon Price John, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix LaHaye (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ahecht was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix LaHaye (November 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 02:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

[edit]

Based on the recent uploads to Wikipedia it appears you have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure. In the meantime, you should no longer edit articles directly where there is a conflict. CNMall41 (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1440: The knowledge company for the intellectually curious, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 17:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Isabelle Blake, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Isabelle Blake|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Wikishovel (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to 1440: The knowledge company for the intellectually curious while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with 1440: The knowledge company for the intellectually curious. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

You were warned, you were asked to respond before making further edits, but you chose to ignore. Therefore:

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
~Anachronist (talk) 03:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to draft space

[edit]

Your article has been moved to Draft:1440 (company) because it does not appear to be ready for article space, and you evidently have a conflict of interest. Editors with a conflict of interest should not attempt to create articles in mainspace themselves. Once you get unblocked, you can continue improving the draft and submit it for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Lahaye (August 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Felix LaHaye for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felix LaHaye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix LaHaye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]