User talk:Itzcoalt

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Itzcoalt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you recently removed content from Spotlight (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 23:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Géza Vermes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Catholic dissidents. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Erasmus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Fry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Voltaire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baruch Spinoza. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michel Onfray. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Garry Wills. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aroup Chatterjee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Victor Hugo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Dawkins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dan Brown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Carroll (author). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Cornwell (writer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jean Meslier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Julian (emperor). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 11:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Géza Vermes, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Erasmus, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Baruch Spinoza, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Voltaire, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Michel Onfray, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Garry Wills, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dan Brown, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Victor Hugo, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Julian (emperor), you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jean Meslier, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at John Cornwell (writer), you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at James Carroll (author), you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Richard Dawkins, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at David Hume, you may be blocked from editing. --GenoV84 (talk) 09:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedures[edit]

I believe you have not made any edits to talk pages since some minor comments at Talk:DC Extended Universe in July 2015. That would be fine if you were not involved in disagreements with other editors. For example, rather than repeating your edits at Richard Dawkins (diff1 + diff2), you must use the article talk page to explain why your edits are desirable. Collaboration is required at Wikipedia so please determine where you can engage with GenoV84 who has been reverting your edits (GenoV84: Have you attempted to discuss the disagreement? The templated message above are not suitable.) In conclusion, if you are not willing to discuss your proposed changes, you must not repeat them as that is edit warring, even if slowly. Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Richard Dawkins while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 02:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Géza Vermes. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --GenoV84 (talk) 11:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Doctor Octopus into Spider-Man. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Géza Vermes does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^ßorg 02:20, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bart D. Ehrman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SamWilson989. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Frank Underwood (House of Cards), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you have something in quotation marks immediately before a cited source, it implies the quote is from the source. Please make sure this is the case before adding such a quote. Thanks, SamWilson989 (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in House of Cards (season 3), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SamWilson989 (talk) 22:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stan Marsh, you may be blocked from editing. — MRD2014 (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jet set, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 03:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 02:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categories are for defining attributes. A category like 'Christian superhero' goes on Bibleman, not Spider-man. MrOllie (talk) 22:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting a bit and repeating the same problem edit isn't any better. MrOllie (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 00:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]