User talk:JH 30 1991

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, JH 30 1991, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Gravity (book) (August 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about? It's the latest book by a world-famous author and filmmaker. How does that not meet the criteria? I appreciate that I only gave a basic summation of the book, but I did so with the understanding that someone else would provide more information to build on that base. Am I supposed to provide the entire article straight away, fully formed and with references? JH 30 1991 (talk) 16:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No a new article does not have to be "entire" or "fully formed" but yes references are essential. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS) - In this case see WP:NBOOKS. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, JH 30 1991! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Gravity (book) (August 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Any more reviews/coverage in mainstream, non-promotional newspapers/magazines?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Night in the Lonesome October[edit]

Hello, JH 30 1991,

Thank you for creating Night in the Lonesome October.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! Though WP:GNG, the general notability guideline (which decides if articles are worthy of notice to be included on Wikipedia) needs at least two reliable, independent, in-depth references. Also, see WP:NBOOK, the book notability criteria. However, other than the single review from Publishers Weekly, my WP:BEFORE search didn't find many other reviews that meet notability, unfortunately.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 10:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, JH 30 1991. Thank you for creating Night in the Lonesome October. User:VickKiang, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Like I said on my user talk page, IMHO notability (which decides if articles are suitable to be included on Wikipedia), see WP:NBOOK (book guideline) or WP:GNG is borderline (please have a look at the links first). GNG and NBOOK criteria 1 require 2+ refs. This book currently has just 2; both are long enough to be significant/in-depth, despite the second one also covering two books simultaneously. Therefore, I'm marking it as reviewed for now, so this would be indexed on the web, but I have added a citation needed tag, see WP:V, and will leave the notability tag on for now due to it being borderline. Also, this is no longer a stub at 285 words of prose size and 319 words in total. So, there are areas that you need to improve on for the article; I replied to your message on my user talk page. Many thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 21:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zero Gravity (book)[edit]

Information icon Hello, JH 30 1991. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zero Gravity (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zero Gravity (book)[edit]

Hello, JH 30 1991. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zero Gravity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JH_30_1991&oldid=1140010195"