User talk:JOEY the ULTIMATE!

I would like to say first that I am not a sock puppet of any other user.JOEY the ULTIMATE! (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Viewing numbers must be supported by reliable sources. Websites that can be freely created by any random anonymous person will never be considered reliable Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My source is not anonymous. Even if it was, I've seen sources like mine on other articles have been used and accepted. For example, in List of Instant Mom episodes, the viewing data is sourced with a citation like mine. But, mine isn't anonymous. JOEY the ULTIMATE! (talk) 15:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "John Fahtar". I did a simple search for that name and came up empty. Why would that person with no reputation at all related to viewing numbers be considered a reliable source for anything. Anybody can create a page on that site and don't even need to prove who you are in real life. The fact that other pages on Wiki are using bogus references does not create any sort of precedence to override wiki's policy on verifiability. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 12:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JOEY the ULTIMATE! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am NOT a sock puppet. I just checked the history of the article and thought that the source was reliable. Please unblock me. I do not understand why I am blocked because I made ONE single mistake. JOEY the ULTIMATE! (talk) 15:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Between the behavioral similarities and the "technically indistinguishable" CU result, I'd say that you are indeed a sockpuppet. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:54, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not a sock puppet. What do I do to prove it? JOEY the ULTIMATE! (talk) 12:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]