User talk:Jason foren daniel

Welcome!

Hello, Jason foren daniel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Lor^Chat 08:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Jason foren daniel, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jason foren daniel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Psychological action thriller

Hello Jason foren daniel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Psychological action thriller for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.123.223.226 (talk) 11:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert this edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant&diff=prev&oldid=640241974

Two issues. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/12/234627.htm and other places gives the name Global Coalition to Counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) so we should not change it. Second, the Other Conflicts refers to exactly that, compared to the Iraq and Syria Wars. Legacypac (talk) 21:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. "Counter" is part of the official name so we should not change what the US State Department calls the group even if we think it is not correct.

I get the idea English is your second language. Where are you from? Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Lor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hug with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lor^Chat 06:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Hug. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Meters (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to think that these dead links are vandalism. There are indeed US schools that ban hugs, and I don't doubt that there are schools where the students have protested. Meters (talk) 07:02, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The first of those refs has been in the article for years, and it took me all of about 60 seconds to verify that it is real. See [1]. Maybe you should try looking first before you decide that something is vandalism? I didn't bother trying to verify the second ref, but I have no doubt it is real too.Meters (talk) 07:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Exorcist (film)

Hi. I notice you reverted my removal of a copyvio from this article. I presume you meant to revert the ip and not me. Nevertheless, your action resulted in a second copy of the offending material being present in the article. I have removed both copies, but please be more careful in future. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 16:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image use

Jason, while I'm sure you meant well in uploading a more recent photo of Will Smith, a non-free image CANNOT be used to replace a free image of a living person. I made the same mistake in the past, and figured I should help you before it becomes a problem. For more information, see WP:Non-free content criteria and WP:Image use policy. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PROD tag

You seem to have placed a proposed deletion tag on my user talk page rather than on an article. I've removed it from my user talk page. If you wish to propose a page for deletion, you need to put the tag on that page, not on a user talk page. If you need any assistance, just ask and I can help you with that. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you've done it again. I have gone through the procedure of nominating the page List of interracial romance films for deletion. You can participate in the deletion discussion by going to this page and making any comments you wish. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to request deletion so I posted the message, can you delete the article?.Jason foren daniel (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to discuss, it offends me, please delete the page.Jason foren daniel (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid that whether or not it offends you personally is wholly irrelevant; the article will be retained or deleted on the basis of the interpretation of an admin of the discussion. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Will Smith in paris.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Will Smith in paris.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Amber rose.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amber rose.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why was i blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jason foren daniel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand, visitors of this page please look at my edits, no edits are destructive.See WP:SOCK it states improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks or otherwise violate community standards and policies, I have done none of the above mentioned activities.Yes, i accept that I have more than one account, on what basis can you block my account?.I have not made any destructive edits to wikipedia and only if I have made destructive edits I can be blocked, but my other account has been inactive and also have not made any destructive edist on that one either

Decline reason:

This edit alone is enough to give the lie to your claim that you were not abusing multiple accounts, as it is clearly an attempt to deceive. Likewise at User talk:Legacypac you were clearly abusing two accounts. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It appears that you were blocked because a Wikipedia:CheckUser determined that you were likely using more than one account. That's not normally allowed, even when the edits themselves are not abusive. If there is a valid reason the checkuser would have found such evidence I suggest that you discuss it with User:Materialscientist. Meters (talk) 17:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You claim your other account is inactive; you only created it on January 1st, since when you have made some fifty edits using it. Would you care to re-state your situation?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account, as you are aware, was created on December 12th last year. Are you referring to a further account? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you may not removed or alter declined unblock requests; make a new request if you feel the need. Note that if you alter another declined request, it is very likely that your talk page access will be removed. Kuru (talk) 15:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did not make 50 edits, my other account appears to be hacked if you look at the log it says it has been accessed from many locations.Can anyone explain that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.141.20.201 (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

Because of your persistent sockpuppetry, I am revoking your talk page access. Anyone with any legitimate interest in editing here wouldn't do that. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Your addition to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:27, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:59.89.204.58

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User talk:59.89.204.58, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]