Thanks for uploading Image:Karelmarquez.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -Danngarcia 15:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you've been fighting a lot of vandalism at Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan. I'm pretty sure it's subtle vandalism, anyway - the "fag" and "drama crap" and "who cares" references give it away. I also noticed that you put the {{pp-semi-protected}} template on the page, but that doesn't actually protect it unless an admin protects it, so I've taken care of protecting it.
Please don't put protection templates (ex. {{pp-semi-protected}}) to articles that are not actually protected by an administrator. If you want to request for protection please report at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Thanks... -Danngarcia 16:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. -Danngarcia 16:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Alexis Green Zaido.jpg[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading Image:Alexis Green Zaido.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Cervano Red Zaido.jpg[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading Image:Cervano Red Zaido.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Gallian Blue Zaido.jpg[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading Image:Gallian Blue Zaido.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Amazonas.jpg[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading Image:Amazonas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PolarWolf ( grrr... ) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Sorry, but I don't think you're the youngest editor here ^_^ LOL --PolarWolf ( grrr... ) 22:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Girlsarmy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 13:24, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please take the time to read up on our non-free content policies. WP:NFCC. Your recent image uploads have lacked source information, detailed fair-use rationale and have also included non-free images that are not being used. I have deleted them all. Please feel free to reupload any images which you can ensure will be compliant with our policies. Thanks. SpartazHumbug! 17:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please cite valid references about Marian Rivera winning the award (or I might as well delete the citation section as well since the award wasn't notable). Starczamora (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:GammaZaido.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Thanks for uploading Image:GammaAlvaro.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:GammaZaido.jpg. The copy called Image:GammaZaido.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 12:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please DO NOT remove the nomination tag. It does not cancel the nomination. Please proceed to this discussion form and state your case. Thak you. Starczamora (talk) 12:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE... Nomination has been retracted. However, I have edited it to only include current programs. See this discussion for the logic behind it. Thank you. Starczamora (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GammaAlvaro.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:GammaAlvaro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gigawiga.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Gigawiga.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IdaZaido.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:IdaZaido.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:IdaZaidoTVseries.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 13:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DrigoZaido.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 13:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Drigo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bolaboba.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Bolaboba.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Amazonas.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Amazonas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bawawaw.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Bawawaw.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IdaZaidoTVseries.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:IdaZaidoTVseries.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Le-arFused.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Le-arFused.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Niginigi.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Niginigi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
Orphaned non-free media (Image:ZaidoTVScreenshot.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:ZaidoTVScreenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged Image:Gobingo.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Melesse (talk) 03:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Zaido.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 16:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Case Closed are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk·contribs) 16:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Kuuma Le-ar.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Kuuma Le-ar.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Image copyright problem with Image:Tinikik.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Tinikik.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shake Rattle & Roll X, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tavix(talk) 03:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated Shake Rattle & Roll X, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shake Rattle & Roll X. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tavix(talk) 23:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a reliable source for the content about Magalona dying? I don't mean a blog, I mean a trusted third party publication that states he died. If so, please add it. If you don't, I'm reverting the content again as it is not verified. PinkadelicaSay it... 05:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a reliable source for Francis Magalona being Roman Catholic? I couldn't find any news sources that stated this. Fences and windows (talk) 01:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Also, please remember to sign your talk page messages with ~~~~. Thank you. -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 13:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you are finding a lot of information to contribute but you do not provide sources for the information. Since you are clearly getting the information from somewhere, please cite the sources. There is a great risk that all of your hard work will be reverted if you don't start adding sources. -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 12:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you need help adding resources, let's talk here. I won't block you from editing if you need help with sources, but you must stop adding things for a while. -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 13:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're not stopping. -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 13:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could we please confine our discussion to one talk page: preferably here? It would be quite helpful if you would answer this direct question: Do you understand that you need to tell us where you get your information? Thank you. -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 14:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I await your reply to the above question. If you do not reply and you add information to an article without sources, you will be blocked. The choice is yours. I'm trying to help you here. You can't continue doing as you please while just saying your editing is "clean and fair". -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 15:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is now clear that you do not understand or respect Wikipedia policies. Since you have not listened to my warnings, and you continue to make contributions without providing any sources, you have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Please take the time while you are blocked to ask questions here on your talk page about how you can prevent being blocked in the future. -- Mufka(u)(t)(c) 13:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
JBR99, i know ho w much you love to edit the Darna page. Do you know a Enclyopedia of Darna has been created? Darna Wikipedia is the place where you put all the infomation about Darna! Please, create an account over there and make contributions there. Remember, everyconritubtions on Darna Wikia is benifical for the website. Please, sign up and join us today on Darna Wikipedia! Darna Wiki (talk) 01:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
you recently edited the Darna page. Do you want to find all the information about Darna, her villains and her friends. Then, go to the Darna Wiki. It is an encyclopedia for Darna fans. You can read all the information about Darna. It will make you happy. All the pages are updated everyday so tune in to read information. Thank You! Darna Wiki (talk) 23:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DO not add your own made up theories or connections to any page on Wikipedia. Saying any particular character is based on another without an official source that says so is not allowed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jbr999! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
My username's IP address is same. please unblock my IP adress here.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy, such as a VPN service. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
If you are using an open proxy or VPN service, you will need to disable it or turn it off in order to edit Wikipedia.
If you believe you are not using an anonymizing proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the Unblock Ticket Request System.
More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). For more information, see the WikiProject on Open Proxies.
Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using an open or anonymizing proxies in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.
: Used abusively|Alison}}
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
This editor has been caught in a rangeblock of a banned editor. Checkuser shows this editor is completely uninvolved, so granting IPBE here - Alison❤ 00:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.
Hi there. I'm really sorry, but you had got caught in a block meant for a banned editor. Obviously, you're not that editor yet we cannot lift the block of that range. We have granted you a privilege called IP Block Exemption which means you can now log in and edit as normal! Sorry about all the trouble - Alison❤ 00:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok then allison. don't do it again. I was an editor here since last 2 years.
Please don't add characters to the cast list of Endless Love (Philippine TV series) without providing sourcing. There has been too much vandalism going on in that article, and if people don't add sources, I'm going to remove the names. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 00:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Everald, please INCLUDE Kathryn Bernardo (she's a Filipino child actress) as Young Jenny. This young actress can act then you really DON'T KNOW who she is?! She's from Going Bulilit before! Just only add Kathryn Bernardo only.... and please don't tell me that I vandalize everything but I DO NOT VANDALIZE that article. Why don't YOU make "Kathryn Bernardo" ON YOUR OWN!! - JBR999[reply]
Ther is absolutely no reason to have an entire article just on Buredoran. First of all he is not the main antagonist. He is just a recurring antagonist. And second, there have never been individual articles on any Super Sentai (or Kamen Rider) antagonist. It's not a good time to start, particularly when articles on fiction and fictional characters are under such scrutiny.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shadow Moon is a special case. Buredoran is not. Also please stop leaving me messages about this.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Anything that happens in Gokaiger should only be mentioned on pages concerning Gokaiger. Do not mention that other characters have appeared in Gokaiger on the pages concerning their TV series.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for File:KuumaMothership.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KuumaMothership.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do not add content to our articles unless it can be verified by reliable sources. Magazine scans cannot count as reliable sources unless that particular magazine is available for sale in Japan, because often the scans come online before they are sold to the public in Japan.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do not add entries to the list until after the episode that features them has aired. Ninjaman's entry will have to wait for January 8.—Ryulong (竜龙) 11:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I told you not to add characters until after they appear. Everything you state about the 5 final returning actors cannot be reliably sourced.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kazuoki Takahashi no longer uses his last name. Do not add "Takahashi" to the guest cast list, again.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is not important to list the other roles the actors have been in on this list. Just list that they're reprising ONE particular character.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:20, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Stop that. We do not need to say that the people have portrayed any other character other than the one that they're reprising.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.
Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.
Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Bubble Gang recurring characters and sketches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gloria Romero. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:AlDub's first couple photo, Sept 26 2015.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:AlDub's first couple photo, Sept 26 2015.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free rationale for File:AlDub's first couple photo, Sept 26 2015.jpg[edit]
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, regarding your recent edits at Kalyeserye, please note character descriptions should be brief and should contain real-world context instead of just being focused on in-universe detail. They certainly aren't the place to keep adding more and more detail that is best suited for plot summaries. Please note also that the character list is flagged as in need of trimming, so adding more isn't going to make the section less detailed. Lastly, please be aware I opened a discussion about this on the article's talk page a few days ago. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kalyeserye - Please stick to main and recurring characters[edit]
Hi there, you should probably familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style for Television, which represents established community consensus for what sort of content belongs in articles. While I think your heart is in the right place when you make edits like these, character lists should only focus on main and recurring characters, not every single character to ever appear on Kalyeserye. Focusing on insignificant characters only creates article bloat. Sites like Wikia.com may be better suited to receiving every minor detail, but Wikipedia is only interested in presenting broad overviews of its subjects. Note also, please, that editing against established consensus (MOS:TV) is widely considered disruptive, which I'm sure is not your intention. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Jbr999, your edits here where you silently reverted edits made by AngusWOOF, are not constructive. You should not be reverting without providing a coherent, rational explanation, and the best place to do that is on the article's talk page. If you were confused by AngusWOOF's changes, you should not have reverted, you should have opened a discussion and asked him to explain. You are not at liberty to silently stonewall other editors' changes. All articles should be able to evolve. Stonewalling is disruptive and if you continue to do it, you will find your editing privileges interrupted.
AngusWOOF has been around for a while and he is quite familiar with television editing norms. In his edits, he added {{vanchor}} templates to make it easier to link to those characters from other pages. This is a useful feature, and it's common for TV character lists. Angus also fixed the over usage of slashes (/) in the article. "Divina Ursula Bokbokova Smash / Yaya Dub", which you restored, is sloppy and inconsistent with MOS:SLASH. Characters should be presented simply, and if the most common use of the character's name is Yaya Dub, that's what she should be listed as, with further details appearing in the prose section if warranted. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jbr999. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Jbr999. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading File:Zaido.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 09:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -Danngarcia 15:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. -Danngarcia 16:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Drigo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
This is the last warning you will receive for adding unsourced or original content, as you did to Darna (2009 TV series). If you continue this activity you will be blocked from editing. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:51, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 09:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)