User talk:JeffreyDutch
|
Hi JeffreyDutch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 12:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hybrid blockchain[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Hybrid blockchain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://blockchaincircle.de/jutta-steiner. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:21, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Sphilbrick: Hello, I am working for over four days on the hybrid blockchain draft that just got speedy deleted. I am researching different types of hybrid blockchains and have put that information about Polkadot there so I can continue writing on it in my own words. That entire article is being written by myself, except that little piece about Polkadot because I am not finished yet. This is very complex material and it takes a lot of time to make sure everything is accurate. I apologize for this mistake from my part, I was not aware I am in conflict while still working in draft. I do not understand why the entire draft got deleted instead of just that little part of a long piece of work. I have submitted a request to allow me working on the draft version again. And I will not make the same mistake again. But please, can you clarify why speedy deletion instead of removing my mistake or make a comment to resolve?
Welcome![edit]
Jeffrey,
A belated welcome to Wikipedia. It seems that you are already very good at editing. Well done! Just in case, here are a few pages you might find helpful:
How to create your first article
If you have any queries or suggestions about the general function of Wikipedia, the village pump is a great place to go! Also, other help and discussion pages can be accessed from links on this page. Additionally, barnstars are a great way to reward people. They are like a level above thanking. Actually, for your hard work, I am going to reward you with a Barnstar Of Diligence!
Should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact any Wikipedian or Wikipedia:Help.
Happy editing and I hope you stay!
Best, Muffington (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Barnstar![edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For your hard work and continuous edits! Congratulations, Muffington (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
- @Muffington: Hello, thank you very much for the warm welcome and cool Barnstar. You bring a smile to my face! It was pretty hard and rough to get started here for me, but I don't give up, try to follow the guidelines and all be fine! Thank you for the additional links, which I will read for sure. It is a lot to take in when starting on Wikipedia, but so far so good. Happy editing to you as well! JeffreyDutch (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello, JeffreyDutch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.
A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.You are required to strictly adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, and the letter and spirit of the conflict of interest guideline. You are also required to cite reliable sources to support blockchain or cryptocurrency content you add. Cryptocurrency enthusiast websites, social media and the company's own website are not reliable sources. MER-C 13:14, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
@MER-C: Hello, and thank you for your message. I do understand concerns, but also I do not understand. Wikipedia is missing important information, research and developments in blockchain and needs to be properly updated to stay up-to-date. Nowhere did I place inaccurate information. Also I do not have a conflict of interest and most definitely not being paid, expected to be paid or accepting to be paid. However, I will no longer make additional content on Wikipedia if there are doubts about this. The only thing I do in my free time is follow blockchain developments and I fully believe that I have knowledge about blockchain that should be written about on Wikipedia, as a lot of information simply is not up-to-date and therefor incorrect. Education in blockchain is very important and I see that Wikipedia can do better, which is why I am here. And yes, I have a lot of connections in blockchain, whether it is Bitcoin or any other. And I have websites about blockchain, but not affiliated or working with or for them, and not promoting either any of my own websites, as I write about all blockchains and give my best effort to reference to academic research and mainstream coverage, which can sometimes be hard to find with new technology! Have a good weekend. JeffreyDutch (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Edit: Also all these sanctions and notices on my user page look really bad for me. I know it says I have done nothing wrong, which is true, but still! Anyone visiting my user page will only see this and not my efforts. Just delete if something is not done right or edit my content or remove sources, I don't mind any of that.
@MER-C: sorry, another additional comment. Many pages have a lot of inaccurate information. Really a lot. Many pages should be completely or partially rewritten. I don't do any of that, not only because it is more work than I can do, but also because it is highly controversial. However, I am confident some day more people like me will make appropriate changes to blockchain related pages.
- The purpose of the sanctions regime is to stop Wikipedia being used for cryptocurrency touting and scamming, in violation of securities law, and the abuse of Wikipedia to promote blockchain startups/platforms. If you are going to continue editing in this topic area, you need to know that the sanctions regime exists and someone is going to tell you sooner or later.
- Many of the crypto specialist websites have less than zero journalistic integrity. I am not saying you are doing anything worthy of the banhammer - I've handed out well over a hundred similar notifications, including five today. That said, some of the sources at Hybrid blockchains (e.g. 13 through 17 inclusive) are not reliable sources and should not be included. If you focus on the research, and review papers only, you should be fine. Parroting claimed aims of blockchain projects as reality is a no, unless a reliable source has shown that they have been achieved. If you can't find a reliable source to support something, you should not add the information.
- As for being kept up to date - that isn't exactly true. We deliberately stay behind the bleeding edge to see what works and is actually useful or is otherwise remarkable, as determined by reliable secondary sources. MER-C 15:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
@MER-C: Thank you for further clarifying and regardless I do appreciate your efforts for Wikipedia.
Nomination of Dragonchain for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dragonchain, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonchain (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)