User talk:Jenulot

Hello, I'm Aoi. Your recent edit to the page Kilauea appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 16:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Mandruss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Donald Trump have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ―Mandruss ☎ 23:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the edit and thank you for reverting Jenulot (talk) 23:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at HowToBasic. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: HowToBasic was changed by Jenulot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960664 on 2018-06-02T06:21:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Kunle Dada-Luke. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 06:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Any Questions for Ben?.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Any Questions for Ben? was changed by Jenulot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954173 on 2018-06-02T06:36:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Longhair\^talk 06:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jenulot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hate to edit in here but I will be rather be in the administration incident page to discussJenulot (talk) 06:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 13:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've revoked your talk page access. You've given us no reason whatsoever to trust that you'd ever be of any use to us, so I'm not even going to give directions for what to do at this point. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jenulot. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]