User talk:JessicaHendy

Welcome!

Hello, JessicaHendy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jessica Nicole Henderson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ducknish (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

Proposed deletion of Jessica Nicole Henderson

The article Jessica Nicole Henderson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and no evidence of meeting WP:NMODEL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ducknish (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jessica Nicole Henderson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Nicole Henderson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:21, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you created the page and that there is a flag for deletion on it but that is not the proper way to have a article deleted. Mainly, because it removes the template and categories displaying it needs to be deleted, thus making it harder for administrators to find it since it isn't categorized under "All articles proposed for deletion."

Cheers, Mate!

Riley Huntley (talk) 03:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jessica Nicole Henderson

The article Jessica Nicole Henderson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Jessica Nicole Henderson. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 14:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Nicole Henderson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Nicole Henderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Nicole Henderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:00, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012 (continued)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JessicaHendy. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JessicaHendy. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jessica Nicole Henderson, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 22:08, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jessica Nicole Henderson JoeSperrazza (talk) 22:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JessicaHendy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion with JessicaHendy

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with JessicaHendy. What you say here will be public for others to see.

Start a discussion