User talk:Jesusisking3305

This is Jesusisking3305's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kansas Rowing (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All sources are primary and don't establish notability. See the general notability guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kansas Rowing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 22:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jesusisking3305! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 22:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richat Structure[edit]

I don't care that you are a student editor who's got an assignment to do. This article gets tens of thousands of readers every month who's readership experience is more important than your assignment. Please read WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE and WP:RS before trying to edit an article again. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your proposed draft edits to a subpage of your user page where it will be more appropriate to edit and discuss this content. Please pay careful attention to Wikipedia's rules about WP:NOR as well as to what are considered to be reliable sources (which do not include YouTube videos or blog posts). I think you've made a valiant effort with this material and I would like to see some of it included in the article. Hoopes (talk) 18:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kansas Rowing (November 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kansas Rowing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am a bit confused as to Wikipedia's standard among Wikipedia editors in regards to what is considered a reliable source in the realm of college athletics. After viewing the sources for the Kansas Jayhawk's football page, I observed the sources listed for that page are of an extremely similar nature to that of the sources provided for the Kansas Jayhawks' women's rowing page draft. Are there different standards of acceptability depending on the Wikipedia editor? Additionally, thank you for the link with more information about sports sources. I have reviewed the guidelines for sports persons & athletes, and I will provide more extensive sources in my next submission. Jesusisking3305 (talk) 03:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]