Jump to content

User talk:JoeranB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, JoeranB, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

April 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Docear has been reverted.
Your edit here to Docear was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijU5BbbrZ_Y) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JoeranB. Not sure if you are actively editing these days. If you are (or if you return) I wanted to bring to your attention the situation at Docear and SciPlore MindMapping‎. Back in May 2012, the deletion discussion was closed with a consensus to merge Docear to SciPlore MindMapping‎. In July 2012, in what I believe was a good faith, but ultimately erroneous understanding of that decision, you redirected the latter to the former (when, in fact, we were trying to merge the former into the latter). I have since reverted your redirect and I have restored the merge tag as I believe nothing has happened to either article that address the concerns raised as the deletion discussion. What should happen in this scenario is that useful content from Docear should be merged into SciPlore MindMapping (with proper attribution!) and Docear turned into the redirect. For more information, see WP:MERGETEXT. Please let me know if you have any question or concerns, of if you disagree with my decision. Singularity42 (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not really see a reason why content from Docear should be merged into SciPlore Mind Mapping. SciPlore is not maintained any more but Docear is the official (and very actively maintained) successor and the tool that most people will be looking for. If someone looking for Docear will be forwarded to SciPlore MindMapping he will be very confused (it's like forwarding someone looking Microsoft Office to Microsoft Works). As such, I would strongly propose to keep Docear as the primary article and forward the SciPlore MindMapping page to it. Personally, I even think that there is good reason to keep both articles because Docear is not just the same software as SciPlore MindMapping with a new name but Docear is developed by a (partly) different team than SciPlore MindMapping, based on entriely different source code. It's basically two different products (like Microsoft Works and Microsoft Office). Anyway, I could life with having SciPlore MindMapping forwarding to Docear, but the other way around would seem very strange to me. JoeranB (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I pasted my response to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Docear because I feel there should be a new discussion JoeranB (talk) 20:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Www.project-team-rewards.com---the reward house.png listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Www.project-team-rewards.com---the reward house.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Train2104 (t • c) 21:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Basalisk inspect damageberate 02:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]