Jump to content

User talk:JohnKent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JohnKent, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi JohnKent! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by My name is not dave was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 18:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concerned Officers Movement has been accepted

[edit]
Concerned Officers Movement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 09:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello John, thank you very much for your article. I accepted it because it ticks all the basic boxes, but there is still work to do in terms of formatting. I've fixed the section headings already, you should note that across the encylopedia they are all in Sentence case, And Not Like This, for example. Take a look at the Simplified Manual of Style, and rules for when bold, italics and ALL CAPS should be used, for your article contains much of this which should really be taken out. Thanks, My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 09:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
John, thank you very much for your article GIs Against Fascism. I learned something today. Please keep up the good work and if you have any problems with the editing software or the sometimes incomprehensible rules and culture here at English Wikipedia, please do not hesitate to contact me on my user page or directly by email at ShoeHutch@gmail.com Best regards, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 13:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also

[edit]

I will add that in the future you should just start your articles in "mainspace" without going through the Articles for Creation bureaucracy. You've got the hang of it. Just make sure that any topic you touch has at least 3 good independently published sources dealing substantially with the topic and of presumed reliability in the footnotes and life will be golden. It would also be a strategically good thing for you to start a "User Page" as soon as possible, as people without user pages draw extra scrutiny from the New Page Patrol people, and that's not where you wanna draw extra scrutiny. Just click the View User Page redlink below and start typing. Thanks again for your efforts. —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 13:50, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GI's Against Fascism for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GI's Against Fascism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GI's Against Fascism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anmccaff (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnKent (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I do not use an open proxy. JohnKent (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You forgot to tell us your IP address, so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnKent (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry I didn't provide my IP address. I'm new to all this. Here it is: 108.171.135.166. This is my IP at work. When I'm home it would be different. Those are the only 2 IPs I use for editing Wikipedia. Thanks. Note: I just checked the list of blocked users and I'm not on it. Does that mean I'm already unblocked? Follow-up Note: I just tried to edit something and I am still blocked. JohnKent (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address belongs to ScanSafe, which functions as an open proxy. You'll need to disable that in order to edit. Note, doing so may have consequences to your security. Yamla (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Short Times Cover 1969.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Short Times Cover 1969.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, JohnKent. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, JohnKent. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Courage to Resist) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Courage to Resist.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article needs copyediting to take a more encyclopedic and neutral tone, particularly in the "Founding" section.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Rothstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Charles Morgan Jr. into Captain Howard Levy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:TheNewLegionsBookCover.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:TheNewLegionsBookCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fort Hood Three, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free The Army tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Gardner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

Fixed. Thanks.JohnKent (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

[edit]
The Content Creativity Barnstar
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure present you with this barnstar in recognition of the great job of work you have done on Court-martial of Susan Schnall. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this needs a reviewer when it goes to GAN, feel free to ping me. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only recently figured out what you meant by GAN and I appreciate your offer to review it. I have just submitted it and hope you are still available. Thank you.JohnKent (talk) 23:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gog the Mild, I appreciate it.JohnKent (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Zeiger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages USC and Mystic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GI Underground Press, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voice of the Lumpen

[edit]

Just had a short look at your marvelous work on GI newspapers. Just as an aside: the Frankfurt Solidariätskommitee (see esp Maria Höhn's very detailed essays), founded by K D Wolff, the last head of German SDS, if I remember correctly, and later Maoist and head of the Frankfurt a. M. Verlag Roter Stern. Various members of the Panthers Solidarity Commitee and the Roter Stern publishers went on to co?-found the Revolutionäre Zellen terrorist group (in some sense at least as important as the Baader/Meinhof RAF) and later on became very important members of Carlos's group - some died "in action". --2001:9E8:5661:1100:D948:27AC:D006:4EB4 (talk) 12:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at The Newsreel. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops. I meant to change those. Thanks for fixing.JohnKent (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

[edit]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

[edit]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of GI Underground Press

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article GI Underground Press you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of GI Underground Press

[edit]

The article GI Underground Press you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:GI Underground Press for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

[edit]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Court-martial of Susan Schnall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Court-martial of Susan Schnall you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Court-martial of Susan Schnall for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made the suggested changes. Thank you!JohnKent (talk) 00:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Court-martial of Susan Schnall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Court-martial of Susan Schnall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this passed as a GA! Congratulations on your first good article, hopefully there will more to follow. Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I have a several more articles in the pipeline and plan to revisit some of my earlier ones based on what I've learned through this process.JohnKent (talk) 14:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Great! If you have any more potential nominations related to women, this is happening through October - Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green/Meetup/3. Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 15:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, actually, I have written another article on an impressive woman. I'll take a look at it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_Lytle_Hern%C3%A1ndez. JohnKent (talk) 15:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland Plain Dealer Front Page Nov 20 1969.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Plain Dealer Front Page Nov 20 1969.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The cover of the Vietnamese Edition of Waging Peace in Vietnam.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The cover of the Vietnamese Edition of Waging Peace in Vietnam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've now added it to the article on the book.JohnKent (talk) 20:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Willbb234. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Willbb234 21:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your deletion. The soldiers actually committed a sexual assault, not even attempted, by trying to rip her blouse off. JohnKent (talk) 22:27, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Servicemen anti-Vietnam War ad NY Times 9Nov1969.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Servicemen anti-Vietnam War ad NY Times 9Nov1969.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Myth of the Spat Upon Vietnam Vet

[edit]

I hate to badger you on your talk page....but you need to weigh in on the talk page of the Myth of the spat upon Vet as to what that article will ultimately be about. If it is about spitting alone, then a lot of things need to come out. Considering the fact you are working on a similar article in your Sandbox, it may be a case where stuff gets shifted around when that is done. But whatever is the case, as the article creator, we need your input. Thanks. Rja13ww33 (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

[edit]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]