User talk:JohnLickor372

March 2019

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that in this edit to Eudlo, Queensland, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eudlo, Queensland, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tillerh11 (talk) 03:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

This was unsourced. See WP:Verifiability. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Chocolate. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please don't create empty sections without doing the work to construct content supported by reliable sources, WP:RS. Zefr (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Duck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torrance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Donald Duck you included material from the Disney Wiki, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Your addition to French fries has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Material you added on 29 April 2019 that was taken from https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/belgian-fries has been deleted. IamNotU (talk) 00:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Drug, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop creating empty "History" sections in articles. IamNotU (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Religion. Stop creating hundreds of empty "History" sections containing only an "expand section" template. It is not helpful. See MOS:BODY. IamNotU (talk) 02:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at French fries, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This edit on 7 May: [1] did not cite any sources. IamNotU (talk) 02:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Countless empty "History" sections, plus copyright violations, etc.. IamNotU (talk) 22:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Phage therapy. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IamNotU (talk) 01:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Flavignerot. This edit, where you wrote: "On 17 March 1979, the Carmelites of Dijon transferred the monastery to a hill, just 13 kilometres southeast of Flavignerot" was unsourced. It also gave incorrect information about the location of the monastery. Furthermore, it made no sense, since there was no prior mention of a monastery in the article. IamNotU (talk) 14:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand that you're trying to improve Wikipedia. But there are very serious problems with some of the things you are doing. One of those is not communicating! I'm asking you to understand that if you don't stop what you have been doing - adding unsourced material, copyright violations, not providing edit summaries, not answering questions, creating unnecessary "History" sections, etc. - there will be no choice but to block you and stop you from editing Wikipedia, indefinitely. That means you will not be able to edit Wikipedia anymore. If you need help learning how to provide citations, how to write things in your own words, use edit summaries, or other questions, just ask! If your English is not very good, it's ok, you still should try to communicate. Please tell me if you understand what I said. Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So I'll take today's addition of two large, blatant copyright violations as a "no" then. --IamNotU (talk) 12:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Espionage has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. IamNotU (talk) 12:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Mentha has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. IamNotU (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You've been blocked indefinitely for repeated block evasion and sock puppetry. See above for how to appeal. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]