Jump to content

User talk:JohnMendal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnMendal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

When I don't know the user thamesinfotech even don't have any relation I am not connected Or don't have any connection with them how can i explain it? JohnMendal (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JohnMendal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi JohnMendal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Press Walla (July 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Thamesinfotech per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thamesinfotech. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 06:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnMendal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't didnajy wrong things here how you can say that I am sock puppet? JohnMendal (talk) 07:33, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, supported with technical evidence, so sockpuppetry is not in doubt. If you are not a sock, you will need to give a plausible explanation as to why technical evidence would indicate otherwise. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When I don't know the user even don't have any relation I am not connected Or don't have any connection with them how can i explain it? JohnMendal (talk) 08:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]