User talk:Jorgieporgie

This user may have left Wikipedia. Jorgieporgie has not edited Wikipedia since September 2006. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Dear Jorgieporgie,

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with two hyphens followed by four tildes --~~~~. The software that runs Wikipedia will automatically convert this into a signature which contains your username and the date and time you posted the message, so other users don't get confused.

I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself on your userpage, you should start by adding {{User:PEAR/welcomed}} to your userpage.

--PEAR 16:31, August User:PEAR/FriendlyDay 2006 (UTC)

Newton Earp[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Newton Earp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Newton Earp. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 07:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work to improve it. There is no reason to delete it, as it is associated with Wyatt Earp, Virgil Earp, Morgan Earp, etc..It's a good article, it can be made better. Like so many articles, it's a work in progress, and deserves the chance to be expanded. I've seen many more less relevant and less accurate articles than that one.

Your edit to Maurice L. Britt[edit]

Your recent edit to Maurice L. Britt (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was my stupid mistake. I didn't search Wikipedia prior to creating the Maurice L. Britt page, not realizing Maurice Britt was already on Wikipedia. I simply went with Maurice L. Britt, instead of searching it under Maurice Britt. A rookie mistake I shouldn't have made. I then went about trying to repair it. I do apologize for any inconvenience. I usually don't screw up like that.

Proposed deletion of Star Tiger and Star Ariel[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Star Tiger and Star Ariel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This article is redundant as the the two aircraft referred to have their own articles - G-AHNP "Star Tiger" and G-AGRE "Star Ariel". It seems pointless to have a single article as the incidents are unrelated apart from the two belonging to the same airline.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Salmanazar (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]