User talk:JoshFight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, JoshFight, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! AngryHarpy‍talk 09:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi JoshFight, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello JoshFight! Your additions to User:JoshFight/Josh fight have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 13:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advice for talk pages[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that in the future, you should leave new comments at the bottom of the page when participating in a request for comment. Read the talk page guidelines if you haven't already, and have fun contributing to Wikipedia! {{u|Bowler the Carmine}} (they/them | talk) 14:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to AfD![edit]

Greetings, JoshFight, and welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Wikipedia's deletion policy, and the pages describing the articles for deletion process, proposed deletion, and speedy deletion. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, and what Wikipedia is not, and to the consensual community guidelines for biographies, corporations, music, and fiction. Also remember that deletion is not always the answer to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! Wizzito (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for this, helpful. I believe that the Josh fight was verifiably true and was written from a reasonable, neutral point of view. JoshFight (talk) 08:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the "backup" article you copypasted[edit]

Hello @JoshFight:. I'm here to kindly ask you to delete the page User:JoshFight/Josh fight. I'll explain why, so read through this section carefully.

That article is the copied text from the Josh fight article, and the only reason for doing so was to safekeep the article content in case it gets deleted. You publicly admit to this on that page's hatnote. Now, to clarify, what you've done does not violate any rules on Wikipedia or elsewise; you as a user are free to use your userspace however you want, as long as it's marginally associated with helping the Wikipedia project. Copying of Wikipedia material is also allowed, especially if done so internally. The problematic part, however, lies in the reason to why you've done this, to "preserve" the article in case of deletion. Deletion is a well-established process on this website, meaning all users are expected to respect and follow it. If an article gets deleted through consensus, then that decision is meant to be followed. The fact that you're expressingly making a "backup" is essentially an attempt to circumvent our processes, thus gaming the system in bad faith. Doing so makes me (and also anyone else discovering your actions) doubt whether you're here to build an encyclopedia or not. Further, note that Wikipedia is not a personal webhost where people can publish any material they like for the public to access. Also, simply copying the text from one location to another makes it hard to discern the contributors for the article's edits prior to that point, which actually does violate our rules.

Now, the deletion discussion in question ended without consensus, which means the original article stayed up - for now. But regardless of what would have happened, your attempt would likely not have been successful since it'd have gone directly against community decision. Deleted topics are deleted, regardless where on the site they happen to be. If the original article is deleted, your copy will deleted too whether you like it or not.

I hope you understand my point and how your action goes against the purpose of this website. I'm sure you are a reasonable person who want to help this website rather than thwart its goals🙂

If you agree with me, you may trigger deletion of the article by entering the text {{db-u1}} to the top of it, which will cause its removal within a few hours. Thank you! Gaioa (T C L) 10:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.
I actually added a lot, including dozens of additional references, and restructured it, adding an Aftermath section and subsections for the event's winner and the associated fundraisers, as well as potential future events. The original article has around twenty references, while mine has over sixty. I will alter it now to make it clear it is no longer a backup, but my idea for an expanded, more detailed version of the page on the main site. Thank you for your concern. JoshFight (talk) 12:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I suppose that's good. But... why don't you just work on the live version instead then? That way your hard work will actually be seen by the readers. Merging two pre-existing articles together is tedious and unnecessary. (Also, remember to indent your comments on talk pages with colons) Gaioa (T C L) 13:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JoshFight&oldid=1030035626"