Jump to content

User talk:Juliesimmon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Juliesimmon, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Beagel (talk) 04:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Coordinates work[edit]

Hey, Julie, thank you for the coordinates work. I became aware of it because of this expression of concern at EAR. I checked four of your changes at random and they look great with one minor, niggling point: This isn't a rule, but the best practice here is not to be overprecise. You can read the details here, but my rule of thumb (and I also do quite a bit of coordinate work) is simpler: just use the maximum precision needed for the crosshairs on a mapping system such as Acme Mapper or Wikimapia to not indicate an ambiguous location. That's, frankly, a lot easier to control if you use decimal coordinates rather than DMS ones but then tell the interface to convert them to DMS. For example:

{{coord|-36.922222|174.752500|format=dms|type:city|display=title}}

The format=dms bit causes them to display in DMS even though they're stated in decimal. For a city you might be able to cut down the precision (I'm not going to actually try this on this example, so it may not be enough in this case) to a single decimal place: -37.0|174.8. If you're pointing at a specific house, on the other hand, you may need to use 4, 5, or 6 decimal places to avoid ambiguity, though 4 is usually enough. One other suggestion: If the article has the same coordinates in several different locations (in an infobox, in a tag at the bottom, sometimes buried in the text, etc.) consider also trying to get them all into a single reference, usually at the bottom if there is no infobox or in the infobox if there is one (and strip them out of the text if they're at one or the other of those places). If they're in an infobox, set up the syntax so that they'll display in both the title and the infobox out of that single reference. Depending on the box and how you enter the coords, that can either be a line of the infobox instructions or a display=title,inline tag in the coord tag. Again, thank you for your work improving the encyclopedia. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 22:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]