User talk:Kabain52

A tag has been placed on John morris pendleton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FreeKresge 16:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with John morris pendleton. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --FreeKresge 17:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with John morris pendleton. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --FreeKresge 17:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with John morris pendleton. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --FreeKresge 17:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Pendleton.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pendleton.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryloyism[edit]

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ryloyism to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 13:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User:Merope[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to User:Merope, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Psychonaut 03:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

February 2007[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Liger. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. SparrowsWing _(talk) 23:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kabane52[edit]

The article Kabane52 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Days of Proclamation[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Days of Proclamation, by Flamgirlant (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Days of Proclamation is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Days of Proclamation, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Days of Proclamation itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson's Deficiency Syndrome

A tag has been placed on Johnson's Deficiency Syndrome, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ArglebargleIV 20:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on MACDL, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste 23:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney, John McCain, and George W. Bush, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 17:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McCain[edit]

Must we have two infoboxes for McCain? I see his name in big bold letters twice instead of once in the infobox(es).Ferrylodge (talk) 05:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Precedence[edit]

Can you explain your rationale as to why you think Sarah Palin is in that particular spot in the order? Grsz ^talk 05:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tom Hamilton[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Tom Hamilton, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Switchercat ^talk_cont 01:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to John F. Kennedy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 23:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for your vandalism of Tommy Hamilton and George W. Bush. The next time you vandalize an article, you will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. - auburnpilot talk 23:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. ~ priyanath ^talk 01:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Philliphamilton52.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Philliphamilton52.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Philhamilton.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Philhamilton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Sandbox has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 04:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense of Kabane 52[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kabane 52, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kabane 52 provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kabane 52, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kabane 52, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chinua Achebe, you will be blocked from editing. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Hey Africa![edit]

A tag has been placed on Hey Africa! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 02:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This article (obviously a joke given the sly link to micropenis at the end) was the last straw. This account has a mixed history of some constructive edits and some vandalism. Please edit constructively or not at all. Since this account is rarely used, I've blocked it for a year. You may request review with {{unblock|your reason here}} Regards.--chaser - t 03:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Creationism in a cheap lab coat[edit]

September 2011[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Harry Potter. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:05, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]