User talk:Kabir bd

Erich Hartmann

I am sorry but I had to revert your edits on this page. Using the "Aces of the Luftwaffe" website is not adviseable. The kills listed do not include the other 7 mustangs (his total was 8 mustangs). This is not an accurate kill count. Dapi89 (talk) 12:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, by the way, I had to revert the image you posted. You uploaded an image of yourself!! Not Hartmann sitting in the cockpit of Kayara One!! Dapi89 (talk) 17:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok i dont mind to know this but the picture which i uploaded in this page,i deleted that before i started the table.I dont know yet the exact process how a picture upload in a wikipedia page.Can you tell me process of uploading a picture in wikipedia?

Hi.

I think you misunderstand my intentions. As you can see from the message below, copying huge chunks of text from other websites is a copyright violation. Besides, as I said in my previous response above, the Aces of the Luftwaffe page cannot be relied upon because it is inaccurrate. It is well known that 8 of Hartmanns kills were Mustangs, and only 1 appears on their table. A significant ommission like this renders the table dubious, therefore it is not appropriate to have on his page, do you see what I mean? Sources, are best when they are from reputable books. Wikipedia demands that sources be reliable, personally I don't use websites unless a have to.

The image: Just do the same as you did before, except remember to select the right one! This time you must credit the source. Click on any image on wikipedia, and you will see how its done. Dapi89 (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Bauer

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Viktor Bauer, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.luftwaffe.cz/bauerv.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles.

Dapi89 (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Hi.[reply]

I am requesting the deletion of the articles you have created concerning Luftwaffe aces.

All you have done is copy, word for word, the text of the "Aces of the Luftwaffe" website. You cannot do this as it violates copyright laws.

Some of the names have been spelt with nicknames first. This is incorrect. Names should be spelt with just their full names - for the article name. Nicknames can be included in the text.

Copyright issue

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Eugen-Ludwig Zweigart. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I have deleted the paragraph that entire sentences from http://www.luftwaffe.cz/zweigart.html. Lisatwo (talk) 21:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Viktor Bauer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Viktor Bauer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.luftwaffe.cz/bauerv.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Viktor Bauer and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Viktor Bauer with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Viktor Bauer.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Viktor Bauer/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Viktor Bauer saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 03:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 14:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for one month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Specifically, you have serially created articles which are substantially cut-and-paste copies of copyright material. You have been repeatedly warned against doing this and you have ignored those warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 14:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ernst Düllberg

A tag has been placed on Ernst Düllberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ✬Dillard421✬ ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Friedrich Geisshardt

A tag has been placed on Friedrich Geisshardt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 01:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of personal details at WP:VPR

Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user with the intent to annoy, threaten or harass, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia. Such posting can cause offense or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches.

If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and follow the instructions there, including emailing this address. It will then be removed from the archives of Wikipedia.

If you do not ensure that the personal information you posted is removed from this site you will be blocked from editing this site. Remember: Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. It Is Me Here (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gustav Sturm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gustav Sturm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20070619050520/http://www.luftwaffe.cz/sturmg.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fritz Lüddecke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fritz Lüddecke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Lüddecke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diethelm von Eichel-Streiber

The article Diethelm von Eichel-Streiber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Major who received the lowest grade of the Knight’s Cross. No indication of any detailed biographical information beyond his awards in sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eugen-Ludwig Zweigart

The article Eugen-Ludwig Zweigart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lieutenant who received the lowest grade of the Knight’s Cross. No indication of any detailed biographical information beyond his awards in sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hans Röhrig

The article Hans Röhrig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Captain who received the lowest grade of the Knight’s Cross. No indication of any detailed biographical information beyond his awards in sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]