User talk:KaitoNkmra23/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Kaito Nakamura, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Kaito Nakamura! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC) |
License tagging for File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Ghostbusters-3-2020.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Ghostbusters-3-2020.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Kaito Nakamura! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
License tagging for File:It official logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:It official logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into It (franchise). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
"Untitled James Wan project" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled James Wan project. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled James Wan project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Haunting of Bly Manor
I've started a discussion at WT:TV regarding the above article, as to whether it's a second season or a completely separte series. -- /Alex/21 10:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Conjuring+3+Instagram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:The Haunting of Bly Manor.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:The Haunting of Bly Manor.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Format
There were several discussions about the "format" you mentioned, all of them resulted in review aggregators to be expressed/written in different ways. The sentence you mentioned was added in the first place, I think, by TropicAces and it was not a community decision or anything (in fact MOS:FILM suggests a very different one that is similiar to my edit). The sentence I wrote explains the Tomatometer better IMO, since it is described as "percentage of professional critic reviews that are positive for a given film or television show
" by Rotten Tomatoes. Also, approval rating is opinion poll, which is not quite what Tomatometer is. ("An opinion poll, often simply referred to as a poll or a survey, is a human research survey of public opinion from a particular sample. Opinion polls are usually designed to represent the opinions of a population by conducting a series of questions and then extrapolating generalities in ratio or within confidence intervals.
") −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 10:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Sebastian James: My question to you is then why have all, yes ALL, film articles I’ve come across mention ‘approval rating’? Should all film articles be changed to this? If it’s been used so much to this point then I feel like it should just be kept that way. And also, you mentioned yourself that MOS:FILM suggests a different one to your own edit, and the edit you made on The Invisible Man is one based on YOUR own opinion, not by the guidelines. Kaito Nakamura (talk) 09:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- First of all, thank you, you finally decided to check your talk page before editing. "ALL film articles you've come across" is not a valid reason, since TropicAces changed most of them as they wished. I'm going to copy paste what I wrote above: MOS:FILM suggests a very different one [from your edit] that is similiar to my edit (only difference is the addition of date: "As of February 2020,..."), and also "approval rating is opinion poll, which is not quite what Tomatometer is..." −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 12:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Malignant (film)
Hello, Kaito Nakamura. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Malignant".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Shining (franchise) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Just as a suggestion, you might want to add a section about the book itself since it is the genesis of the entire franchise. Otherwise it is a great article and I've approved it out of draftspace. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Sulfurboy: Will take that into consideration. Thanks heaps! Kaito Nakamura (talk) 14:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Darragh Ennis
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Darragh Ennis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Darragh Ennis has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Darragh Ennis (May 18)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Darragh Ennis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Darragh Ennis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.