User talk:KamalMahrshi

Proposed deletion of HeenaPanchal

Hello, KamalMahrshi. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, HeenaPanchal, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want HeenaPanchal to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heena Panchal

The article Heena Panchal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG. "7th best item girl of 2015" is not sufficient to establish notability (espeicially without a reference!), and her imdb page shows only a single credit.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 21:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heena Panchal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heena Panchal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heena Panchal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 23:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Kamia-Mulhotra.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kamia-Mulhotra.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamia Mulhotra (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamia Mulhotra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! KamalMahrshi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop adding "Undisclosed" in Infobox fields. If something is undisclosed, it is unknown; if it is unknown, we do not state it (i.e., the field is left blank). General Ization ^Talk 03:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wanted: Dead or Alive (1984 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 00:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Disco Dancer, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 00:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aadat Se Majboor. General Ization ^Talk 00:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KamalMahrshi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Shareef Budmaash

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KamalMahrshi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

I reverted your edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. You only have 473 edits to mainspace, so you don't meet the 500 edit cutoff. Further, your editing shows you are not competent to judge drafts at AfC. If anything, I worry that you're only seeking to make an end-run around our draft process. There are many other places on Wikipedia for you to edit. I don't think AfC is one of them just now. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw other people complaining on your page too and I am sorry to say it seems you have become the Mafia of Wiki and you will decide who will get what share here. If you see carefully my edits and if you have even the smallest knowledge about Bollywood where I belong to what I have added is precious information about missing credentials, missing plots of movies, some of the great actors who were not even mentioned at their rightful places have been edited by me. First have some knowledge about the field and then come up with your comments dude! If I am applying to AFC also is for the rightful place of people from my fraternity because you guys who know nothing about noteworthy people here keep rejecting their drafts, so it's very important someone from here takes the charge to help them and not you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KamalMahrshi (talk • contribs) 10:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"it seems you have become the Mafia of Wiki" lol. gettin' respect like Rodney Dangerfield. "if you have even the smallest knowledge about Bollywood" I never saw a single Bollywood movie, ever. "is for the rightful place of people from my fraternity" Thanks to your edits, that list is now protected permanently. You should have left well-enough alone. "so it's very important someone from here takes the charge" Good luck with that. You might consider Facebook, instead. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'You never saw a bollywood movie' Then how did you make a comment on my edits??? It's like I know nothing of science and I comment on quantum physics. And Chris you are commenting about a field about which you don't even know. Don't you think you have been proved wrong so you are just taking the path of bullying??

August 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I guarantee you want to cooperate with us. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Goonj Uthi Shehnai has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I've taken the liberty of removing your additions to Aas Ka Panchhi, Tangewala, Gehra Daag, Gora Aur Kala, Lalkaar, Sunehra Sansar, Mazdoor Zindabaad, Shirdi Ke Sai Baba, Daku Aur Mahatma, Sone Ka Dil Lohe Ke Haath, Saajan Bina Suhagan, and Dhan Daulat. They are all copyright violations. /wiae /tlk 19:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KamalMahrshi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]