User talk:Kdididkfiffifidifivivivi

February 2021

Hello, I'm UncleBubba. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Donkey (Shrek) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 23:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Genie (Disney), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 23:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Spitting Image (2020 TV series), you may be blocked from editing. credits Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Spitting Image (2020 TV series). Fake credits Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)