User talk:KenKaneki1803

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tryst - IIT Delhi (March 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Stop creating accounts to submit this.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 16:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, KenKaneki1803! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 16:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #55466

is closed. It was his employee at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tryst IITD. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

• Spoiler alert-- UTRS appeal #55445 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

• Please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information.Please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

  {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

  --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Hello KenKaneki1803. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KenKaneki1803. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KenKaneki1803|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

I want to inform you that you are making a wrong assumption here. I am a senior undergraduate at same institute and by subordinate, I meant that the guy is my junior (English is not my native language so please don't mind the vocabulary) That means neither of us are getting paid in any way. We tried to comply with rules by trying to make the article as neutral as possible with only mistake being the yesterday' account abuse which I totally agree was wrong. That being said, all the description in the article is based upon the references that we have mentioned, and I don't feel if it biased. I again want to emphasis the fact that IIT Delhi ranks 54th in QS world ranking for engineering colleges and 2nd in India. The event is one of the biggest technical festival organised by any student organisation. With similar pages already available on the website, if you still feel that the article should't be published or if there is some rule that is being broken in the process, I am ready to end this conversation once and for all. Regards, KenKaneki1803 KenKaneki1803 (talk) 23:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

I just read your conversations in socket puppet thread. Will it take our id cards to confirm our identities?? lol. I really don't understand what makes you think that someone would be paying some individual who doesn't even know how to use Wikipedia properly, to publish some article for some college event. I think I have wasted enough of my time, and probably yours too since this doesn't seem to be working anyway. You guys have already decided that we are some company agents. Very well, goodbye internet moderators. Thanks for your replies. KenKaneki1803 (talk) 23:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

If you'd read through the links you've been provided with above, you'd have realised that even if you are not being paid, you have a conflict of interest with the subject that needs to be properly declared. If you read through those links to familiarise yourself with the expectations, you may appeal this block by following the instructions given in the block notice. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)